It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Son of Will
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
There's two trends here - the awakening of individuals, and the cohesion of awakened individuals.
Originally posted by Son of Will
I think you're being overly pessimistic, and missing an important trend. Yes, it probably looks bad when you look around. But you have to look at the bigger picture - where was this "conspiracy theorist" movement 5 years ago? Small. How about before 9/11? Almost nonexistent. There were isolated pockets of people each with their own specific subject matters.
Originally posted by Son of Will
But afterwards, especially in the last 4 or 5 years, combined with the advancement of the internet, the number of people looking into CTs has exploded from thousands to tens of millions. it's still growing. (I'd love to see an evaluation of ATS membership over the last 8 or so years, as a rough indication of interest in conspiracy theories)
Originally posted by Son of Will
We don't need to agree on everything. We don't need a common ideology, we are born free and should remain so. All we need, is to know that THEIR ideology is wrong and inhumane and unsustainable.
Originally posted by Son of Will
As long as each individual recognizes that he/she is a sovereign entity with inalienable rights, and as long as this trend of political awakening continues, I think we'll be okay. But these things take time. The focus should be on making more people aware of the massive corruption around us - not on making sure that those of us already aware follow the same game plan. I firmly believe that.
The rest of your thread is great, and I think it's a wonderful blueprint for how to get activists more organized.
Originally posted by Justoneman
When I was much younger, and these "theories" were bandied about, their was hardly anyone willing to entertain or otherwise considered these as facts. Well to quote Dylan, "these times they are a changin". People these days are better listeners. They seemed to have weighed the various theories and found some to be, indeed, fact.
Originally posted by Justoneman
Kennedy Assasinations tilted them toward the simple fact that there is some kind of secret gov out there who are doing things in our name, here in the US and probably worldwide, that are not remotely the peoples will. Some things, like segregation and all its sins, MUST be challenged and changed by authority figures of a strong gov.
Originally posted by Justoneman
But to sit back and allow criminals to steal money then start wars as we have witnessed lately, has not been a thing people will tolerate, as long as there is proof of some kind. There is proof of Wall St crimes right down to who made the call for "derivatives:. They keep a paper trail, by our laws. Now people all over this great land think we have perpetrators of crimes walking the halls of the White House. IF you consider that Goldman Sachs connection to the fiasco as fact, it has to be true! At this point it certainly appears that way more people feel this way than don't.
Originally posted by Justoneman
We believe they have commited major crimes and have yet to be arrested. That criminal behavior, if not acted upon by criminal investigative branches of our government, will force the people to conclude it IS ALL OVER anyway. Unlawful behavior will not be tolerated by the masses once they are convinced it is a fact. How many people do we all know who think a crime was committed by the financial institutions and that really 'too big to fail' means Wall St. took us over without firing a shot?
Originally posted by Justoneman
Perhaps the cards are stacked but that just motivates the masses when they understand that has happened. Sure, some will throw in the towel and succumb to being mushrooms. Others will do whatever is necessary as they come to each fork in the road. I choose to think people are more like Braveheart than Woody Allen.
No Spartan King! We will not surrender to criminals, ever! Their motives are never ours and death follows them.
Originally posted by antonia
It's a good thing I wasn't talking to you wasn't it? If it was in reply to you it would have been stated as such.
Well I'm responding to you your post. Not talking.
Originally posted by antonia
You are confusing scientific fact with political truth. Considering the very nature of politics there can be no truth. There can be certain points of view yes, but there can be no truth. Do not confuse the two issues.
Only in your mind can there be no truth.
Please allow me to show you some truth that defeats some political points of view.
George Bush said "The illegals are just here to work" Meaning their is nothing to worry about if illegals come here. So don't worry!
That is his political viewpoint. A blanket statement including all illegals. Now once I find evidence that shows just 1 illegal doing something that is not according to his statement (which is also our gov viewpoint) this political viewpoint is proven wrong.
here you go
www.youtube.com...
Is this something to worry about?
Originally posted by antonia
How do you prove a purely political viewpoint wrong? We are not discussing science here. We are discussing politics.
I just did. With facts. Do you believe the earth is flat?
Why did people almost all people believe that the earth was flat? That is because that is what they were told to believe by those whom ran things. In those days it was the church and government and their political viewpoint.
Why did they tell them that. Because they did not want anyone leaving their control of taxation, by sailing off to new lands. Or even worse starting their own country and then wage war upon them and destroy the power structure. The structure that was used to control people. Facts are a wonderful thing.
How silly is it to believe the earth is flat now? A political viewpoint dis-proven with facts. Now do you see?
Originally posted by antonia
You are yet again confusing academics with politics. How can you prove a political point of view right or wrong?
I already have, twice. Here I will do it again.
Here's another political viewpoint that is getting American troops killed everyday.
"America cannot exist without foreign oil."
The truth is that we could have converted all gas burning engines to alcohol 15 years ago. By the way alcohol burns 98% cleaner than gas. Yes we would still need oil for lubrication. That is true. However it seems to me that their is plenty of oil being let out in the gulf right now. Not to mention that a large oil field was recently found in the Dakotas.
www.wnd.com...
So America can easily exist without foreign oil.
Viewpoint dis-proven again. How about hydrogen engines?
There are thousands of people whom run their vehicles on fuels other than gasoline.
Originally posted by antonia
Ok, since you seem to think I am in some deeply psychotic state why don't you prove your ultimate political truth then?
No, I stated very clearly that people with wrong view points are either psychotic or propagandized, which technically allows one to believe things that are not true without being psychotic.
I think your problem is your not paying close enough attention to the facts.
Isn't that what the elite want? To control everyone?
Originally posted by antonia
I couldn't tell you. You couldn't tell me either.
I guess you didn't read the propaganda definition.
Yes I can and already have. I will gladly wager you $10,000 that I can disprove at least 5 political viewpoints everyday for the rest of my life. That is $10,000 a day by the way, I'll take $100 if you can't afford $10,000.
You see the truth is a wonderful tool to breaking free of control. Don't be so afraid of the truth, it might save your life someday.
GodBlessAll
From our perspective, the gap between the rich and the poor is a better measure of the health of our economy than the S&P 500 or the Dow. Today, the concentration of privately held wealth at the top is at its highest peak since 1929, the year the financial markets crashed and gave rise to the Great Depression of the 1930s. At that time, 25% of the population was out of work.
Despite our economy being mired in the deepest recession since the 1930s, people in the top 1% continue to own as much wealth as those in the bottom 90%, and education is essential to reversing this trend and constructing a strategy for recovery. www.faireconomy.org...
At least 80% of humanity lives on less than $10 a day.Source 1
More than 80 percent of the world’s population lives in countries where income differentials are widening.Source 2
The poorest 40 percent of the world’s population accounts for 5 percent of global income. The richest 20 percent accounts for three-quarters of world income.Source 3
According to UNICEF, 24,000 children die each day due to poverty. And they “die quietly in some of the poorest villages on earth, far removed from the scrutiny and the conscience of the world. Being meek and weak in life makes these dying multitudes even more invisible in death.”Source 4
Around 27-28 percent of all children in developing countries are estimated to be underweight or stunted. The two regions that account for the bulk of the deficit are South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
If current trends continue, the Millennium Development Goals target of halving the proportion of underweight children will be missed by 30 million children, largely because of slow progress in Southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.Source 5
Based on enrolment data, about 72 million children of primary school age in the developing world were not in school in 2005; 57 per cent of them were girls. And these are regarded as optimisitic numbers.Source 6
www.globalissues.org...
Too Much Power?
The G8, is made up of the seven most powerful economies of the world, (United States, Japan, Germany, France, UK, Canada, Italy) and Russia. Together they form a very powerful and influential (though informal) group of nations. For example, they accounting for almost 50% of the votes at the IMF and World Bank. At their annual summits they attract a lot of criticism, increasingly now in the mainstream, for failing the world’s poor. This section introduces the G8 with an overview of recent summits and their outcomes.
By virtue of its combined economic, military, and diplomatic power and influence, the G8/G7 can exercise tremendous influence over the multilateral institutions of global governance. This power gives the G8/G7 great influence on the policies, programs, and decisions of the UN Security Council, World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This is the case despite the fact that, unlike these institutions, the G8/G7 has no permanent staff, no headquarters, no set of rules governing its operations, and no formal or legal powers. For those negatively impacted by the policy agendas advanced by the G8/G7, and for countries excluded from its deliberations, the G8/G7’s influential role in global governance is highly resented and frequently criticized.
www.globalissues.org...
Corporations
Author and Page informationby Anup ShahThis Page Last Updated Wednesday, November 04, 2009
•This page: www.globalissues.org...
•To print all information e.g. expanded side notes, shows alternative links, use the print version:
•www.globalissues.org...
As the world starts to globalize, it is accompanied by criticism of the current forms of globalization, which are feared to be overly corporate-led. As corporations become larger and multinational, their influence and interests go further accordingly. Being able to influence and own most media companies, it is hard to be able to publicly debate the notions and ideals that corporations pursue. Some choices that corporations take to make profits can affect people all over the world. Sometimes fatally.
Corporations and the Environment
Last updated Saturday, May 25, 2002. (Now think BP Oil Leak)
Many industries such as the energy and fossil fuels industry leave many environmental problems in their wake. Because international lending schemes are tied with “reforms” that include cutting back on regulatory and safety measures such as health, education and the environment, problems can arise without many resources available to deal with them. While large corporations are able to profit, the costs from environmental and other damage has to be borne by the local population.
www.globalissues.org...
'The cost of all of this is being pushed on ordinary people who are being hit with the bill, whether it's in Thailand, Greece or the U.S.,' Bullard said. 'There is a common thread. We have to take a realistic look at the financial sector where money moves from one profit to another without any kind of conscience.'
She said the U.S. Social Forum is not a gathering of a 'bunch of leftist activists' but 'real life people who are living the struggles. It's so real. We actually have to get rid of Wall Street. The era of endless growth and profit is not socially or ecologically viable.' www.globalissues.org...
The richest 1% of adults in the world own 40% of the planet's wealth, according to the largest study yet of wealth distribution. The report also finds that those in financial services and the internet sectors predominate among the super rich. www.guardian.co.uk...
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
If the entire membership of ATS however were to get serious about politics, they might actually get worried, seeing as that is their world.
[edit on 26-6-2010 by SpartanKingLeonidas]
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
A win is a victory.
...and...
]
Political ideologies have two dimensions:
1.Goals: how society should work (or be arranged).
2.Methods: the most appropriate ways to achieve the ideal arrangement.
There is zero unity between us but there is 100% unity between the elite.
There is zero belief of any one thing between all of us and 100% belief between the elite.
There is zero agreeing political ideology between us and 100% agreeing political ideology between the elite.
We as the conspiracy theorist community, whether it is ATS, Info Wars, or AmKon have such differing opinions, perspectives, beliefs, and education levels.
But we outnumber the elite 100 to 1 as far as live bodies are concerned.
However, we cannot seem to agree upon one set thing, or one set ideal.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Policy
A policy is typically described as a principle or rule to guide decisions and achieve rational outcome(s).
The term is not normally used to denote what is actually done, this is normally referred to as either procedure or protocol.
Whereas a policy will contain the 'what' and the 'why', procedures or protocols contain the 'what', the 'how', the 'where', and the 'when'.
Policies are generally adopted by the Board of or senior governance body within an organisation where as procedures or protocols would be developed and adopted by senior executive officers.
The term may apply to government, private sector organizations and groups, and individuals.
Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy.
Policy differs from rules or law.
While law can compel or prohibit behaviors (e.g. a law requiring the payment of taxes on income), policy merely guides actions toward those that are most likely to achieve a desired outcome.
Policy or policy study may also refer to the process of making important organizational decisions, including the identification of different alternatives such as programs or spending priorities, and choosing among them on the basis of the impact they will have.
Policies can be understood as political, management, financial, and administrative mechanisms arranged to reach explicit goals.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Think-Tank
A think tank (or policy institute) is an organization or individual that conducts research and engages in advocacy in areas such as social policy, political strategy, economy, science or technology issues, industrial or business policies, or military advice.
Many think tanks are non-profit organizations, which some countries such as the United States and Canada provide with tax exempt status.
Other think tanks are funded by governments, advocacy groups, or businesses, or derive revenue from consulting or research work related to their projects.
According to the National Institute for Research Advancement, think tanks are "one of the main policy actors in democratic societies ..., assuring a pluralistic, open and accountable process of policy analysis, research, decision-making and evaluation".
A study in early 2009 found a total of 5,465 think tanks worldwide. Of that number, 1,777 were based in the United States and approximately 350 in Washington DC alone.
Originally posted by thetruthplease
I disagree to this post simply because I know that the elite has now spent trillions of dollars to hide the truth from us.
Originally posted by thetruthplease
Everytime we get the truth out we WIN.
Everytime!
Originally posted by thetruthplease
We also waste their money each time, and while at the same time making them look foolish by stating the truth that then shows how out of grasp with reality they are.
Originally posted by thetruthplease
What do you think this people do when their alone. They regret themsleves. They are constanly guarding their backs as the people they do business with are just as low as they are. These people are in a constant state of fear. Which is eactly why they wish to case a ever increasing state of fear upon us.
Originally posted by thetruthplease
So thanks for all of your work in conspiracies. It does make a different.
Only the TRUTH can set you free.
Originally posted by LestatG
A great thread, some intersting and well thought out responses. I have to intend to agree with OP on the terms that we use now. However, if something small changes this can change the rules somewhat.
Originally posted by LestatG
In regards to what unites us, I agree that it would be difficult to physically unite. But a thread springs to mind where in was explained how people with a shared ideology can work on their own and still come to the common goal.
Originally posted by LestatG
Think about it, Spartan touched on it when he said that we need to individually act to change things, doing the right thing even when there is no one to witness the act or no way of recognition. This is how we will beat them. Joe public getting onwith thier lives but doing acts toward a common goal or idealology.
Originally posted by LestatG
If no one knows what your doing you can't be stopped. On the way to work, drop of that letter to the government official, give the guy on the street some change, join a movement, hell just say hello to a stranger. Then you will have contributed even a little, after a while who knows what you can achieve.
Try it, if we all did we would be on the right track!
[edit on 25/6/2010 by LestatG]
Originally posted by antonia
When did anyone get a monopoly on truth?
Originally posted by antonia
Truth is a subjective idea. It depends on your point of view. Now, I'm going to get a lot of people screaming at me for saying that. I get called a pinko-commie liberal socialist progressive asshat all the time around here, but what I said was correct. What the truth is depends on who you are talking to.
Originally posted by antonia
This isn't some problem, this is reality. The problem is that many people are so egotistically attached to their world view. They just have to be right. They have everything emotionally invested in being right. No one cares if it works. They just want to win.
Originally posted by antonia
And what is a win? Is it just getting the "Elite" out? Of course not, you leave a vacuum that is going to be filled by something. It's likely over time it will become just as bad as what it replaced. Is a win just getting the "truth" out? You have to remember truth is dependent on one's point of view again. Not everyone is going to buy your line or agree with everything you say. Is a win improving the general well-being of the population? Well, that's gonna be subjective.
Originally posted by antonia
Then you have the problem of the general atmosphere around here. People can't accept that other believe something different. They feel personally insulted when others don't share their point of view. This isn't some kind of sports game yet it's reduced to that everyday. Of course no one takes you guys seriously. Who would want to speak to someone who insults them constantly by calling them a "sheep" or "ignorant"? Who would want anything to do with someone who seems to think ill of those who don't share their beliefs? I sure as hell wouldn't want to talk to you.
Originally posted by Robert Reynolds
The problem is that most people in the West are 'OK' and are the decendants of parents that lived 'OK' lives as well. The masses aren't going to riot or spend all their time protesting unless the MSM that they have such blind faith in, effectively tells them to. No serious movement can take place with only a tiny percentage of people ('conspiracy nuts') taking part. We'd be terrorists, and terrorists that spent most of their time still playing the pride-fuelled games of one-upmanship that is the very basis of the ruling elites 'evil'. This system is something that we're all part of and all trapped by.
As far as I can see, nothing can save us now except for a miracle.
...but guess what you might just get.
Originally posted by Rabaski
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
In my humble experience I can say that what you are saying is very true. I would just like to raise an idea.
Could it be that our different points of view and varied believe is what unites us as a community here at ATS. I would like to use an example.
A writer in South Africa, Koos Kombuis, wrote in a local newspaper here, what is a South African? He mentioned that if you think of a Aussie, an American or a Pommie for example you have a certain stereotype image in your mind of what they would look like.
Then he went on to ask the question 'What image do you see if you think of what a South African looks like?' and I couldn't. We are too diverse, colours creeds and religions. His final conclusion was that maybe it is our diversity and differences, yet our ability to live together that make us so unique and thus a South African.
Sorry for the long story but the point I would like to make, as I stated at the top of my post is that maybe it is this diversity that we can apply to connect us as people.
I believe everyone, or at least the majority of people frequenting this site has the same dream in their hearts. We must look at what makes us similar instead of what makes us different.
Originally posted by superluminal11
They know that we are all interconnected and there is no separation. In the Secret Covenant this is explained. The main message is individuality and not collective. We cant be collective because that would be socialist and communism. Collective is a bad thing and is along the lines of One World Order evil ideology .
Originally posted by superluminal11
They allow us to speak of many of these true things. From Lizard people to JFK. They know we will never come into agreement across the board and will continue to fight amongst each other. So what if there are lizard people and the US orchestrated 911. We get caught up into details and like you said,,,never come into agreement
Originally posted by superluminal11
Some of the Secret Societies/Orders/Corps in-fight but always come to a common ideology where they all come into agreement. We cannot seem to do this as conspiracy theory researchers
[edit on 25-6-2010 by superluminal11]