It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Riposte
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I am very much in favor of this Mosque, I think it promotes religious equality and is a step FORWARD to moving on with this whole mess.
Yeah that's nice. The only problem is, less than 5% of the world thinks like you do, so building mosques all over the place to promote religious equality won't work.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by jfj123
Well obviously I am not saying that EVERY piece of new is decided, but you can bet your bucks the big stuff is certainly carefully worded and presented to make one side look good and the other bad.
There is no such thing as honest journalism anymore. Far too much censorship and favoratism in the media.
I agree perhaps I am taking it too far, but there's just too much media bias for it to be a coincidence as far as I am concerned.
And as for the media outlets, no, there are literally only a handful of independant news outlets.
The rest are all owned by, in one way or another by the big 4.
This is a good news story, although maye a bit biased about how the media is controlled, I don't agree with the "jewish" aspect, but it makes a hell of a lot of dot connections.
pakalert.wordpress.com...
~Keeper
Originally posted by dizzylizzy
A civic centre for all nationalities and creeds would imo be far better. Lets face it only Muslims will use this centre which will do nothing towards social cohesion.
Originally posted by Foppezao
For the people who are ignoring the facts here, answer this..
Why do they call this the Córdoba house? named after the first mosque built by muslims in Spain as a triumph for victory over Spain?
[edit on 6-6-2010 by Foppezao]
My first question on hearing this a couple of weeks ago was whether Americans are completely ignorant of history.
Cordoba was, of course, the seat of the caliphate established in what is now modern Spain after the Islamic invasion from North Africa in the 8th century A.D. The medieval occupation of Spain – “al-Andalus” – is considered by Islamic theorists to have been an inevitable step in the manifest destiny of Islam, and its eventual reversal through the lengthy European “Reconquista” a tragic but temporary triumph of the infidels. The great mosque at Cordoba was built on the foundation of a Christian cathedral, and when Europeans retook Cordoba in the 13th century they turned the magnificent mosque back into a cathedral.
But there is also no question that the mosque at Cordoba represents a history of conquest and reconquest that, from the perspective of Islamists, is at an unfinished stage as of today. The caliphate of Cordoba was the geographic high point of Umayyad Muslim rule – that is, of the original caliphate that succeeded Mohammed – on European territory. It represents a glory that Islamists intend to restore. Its eventual loss to the Europeans represents, equally, an evil reversal, imposed by infidels, that requires redress.
“Cordoba,” in Islamic symbolic terms, means Islamic rule in the West. It does not mean “coexistence,” unless coexistence is interpreted as referring to Islamic rule. Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs cites the article (original in Arabic) published by Iraqi-American Khudhayr Taher on 18 May, in which Taher explains the following: We must note that a hostile and provocative name [Cordoba] has been chosen for this mosque…Choosing the name ‘Cordoba House’ for the mosque to be constructed in New York was not coincidental or random and innocent. It bears within it significance and dreams of expansion and invasion [into the territory] of the other, [while] striving to change his religion and to subjugate him…
It used to not even be a stretch for reasonably well educated Westerners to recognize the place of Spain and Cordoba in the history of the West and Islam. Many of today’s younger adults, however, have learned nothing about the Mediterranean before 1492 except that the Muslim period in Spain was a flowering of science, art, and culture. There was a great deal to admire in the accomplishments of the Muslim Cordobans, but they did, in fact, invade and conquer Spain, sell its inhabitants into slavery, provide a base for slaver raids into other parts of Europe, and rule by the sword in much of the caliphate.
“Cordoba” is not a name that evokes peaceful coexistence of Islam and the West.
A mosque at Ground Zero is something intelligent people can dispute honestly and in good faith. But honesty is essential, and it would be dishonest to dismiss the implications of proposing to name it Cordoba House.
But this is New York! The councillors will be Socialists, Liberals, and other people who in no way represent the American people. Many will be direct decadents of ethnic minorities, who feel they are more X country, than they are American.
so American members of the community have voted 29 to 1 in favour of
Originally posted by Clisen33
reply to post by Parallex
Then why were there so many Palestinians celebrating the attacks on the day of 9/11? I clearly remember seeing that, and it was disgusting. Go back to the last page where infolurker's linked 3 videos, it might refresh your memory.
[edit on 6-6-2010 by Clisen33]
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I don't want to see ANYTHING that has any sort of religion attached to it. Period.
Originally posted by Gentill Abdulla
What is with you guys?
The mosque is just a place of worship. Your beef is with the extremists not the religion of Islam.
I mean it's not like they are planning to build a tribute to Osama sign there.
Unless that's what you think a mosque is.
This is ATS, seriously read the motto.
“Cordoba,” in Islamic symbolic terms, means Islamic rule in the West. It does not mean “coexistence,” unless coexistence is interpreted as referring to Islamic rule. Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs cites the article (original in Arabic) published by Iraqi-American Khudhayr Taher on 18 May, in which Taher explains the following: We must note that a hostile and provocative name [Cordoba] has been chosen for this mosque…Choosing the name ‘Cordoba House’ for the mosque to be constructed in New York was not coincidental or random and innocent. It bears within it significance and dreams of expansion and invasion [into the territory] of the other, [while] striving to change his religion and to subjugate him…