It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lpowell0627
reply to post by seesinclouds
North Africa is one of the most stable areas in the entire world. If it weren't for the rampant disease and illness that grows there due to the climate, it would be the safest place to go in the entire world.
In fact, many of the "true" survivalists -- meaning scientists and such -- are establishing habitats in Southern Africa right now. This is because there is less of a chance of disease there, due to a more modern population, and still in Africa which means it is on more stable ground.
Further, it has been said that during a complete magnetic polar reversal, one of the most violent natural occurances on Earth, Africa would remain largely unaffected.
Perhaps this is why Africa was not affected? Just a theory.
[edit on 27-5-2010 by lpowell0627]
Originally posted by mrmrmikee
reply to post by muzzy
That link is now old, they update every 30 minutes. Did you save the page? What are the numbers in that left column, they don't seem to be rictor scale that's for sure.
Originally posted by mrmrmikee
Heard about this giant solar flare that is about to hit us tonight or tomorrow (my birthday) with an ion cloud that will disturb cell phone calls and all that. As a physicist, I see a connection between the gravity of the sun and this simultaneous earthquake; it is a shift in space itself that earth felt, or in other words, we got a short sample of the gravity drain field at galactic axis which ripple up from the sun's influence. The sun is on galactic axis now, we are not quite there.
Very interesting topic!!!!! I'm glad you brought it to my attention.
What time was this event? And the data, was it exactly the same time everywhere?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ROBL240
Ok.
How about the data that shows the P waves were not recorded worldwide?
Might I add only 2 months ago there was a 6.9 (or so) magnitude quake registered some 350 miles under the Granadian Mountains in Southern Spain, this is exactly the same magnitude and depth as this Brazilian quake and yet worldwide sensors failed to pick this up. Explain that.
[edit on 5/25/2010 by Phage]
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ROBL240
Ok.
How about the data that shows the P waves were not recorded worldwide?
Might I add only 2 months ago there was a 6.9 (or so) magnitude quake registered some 350 miles under the Granadian Mountains in Southern Spain, this is exactly the same magnitude and depth as this Brazilian quake and yet worldwide sensors failed to pick this up. Explain that.
[edit on 5/25/2010 by Phage]
I do see your point. I just have no real explanation myself (probably like most others) as to why yet another quake would not have been recorded by the seismographs. I do not really believe in coinky dinks, but I do believe anything is possible on many levels. Now my question would be, what would that difference actually be compared to the other? how could the difference be explained as to what it was, if that is the case?
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by Persephone1
Well now, if the equipment on a GLOBAL scale failed to pick up one event, but did pick up another, that would suggest that one event was markedly different to another. Im more than capable of understanding that human technology is not fail proof, however when you consider the size of the global seismological network its madness to assume that ALL the worlds seismometers were just having lunch while one event happened, and just happened to be on shift whilst the other did.
Originally posted by lpowell0627
reply to post by seesinclouds
North Africa is one of the most stable areas in the entire world. If it weren't for the rampant disease and illness that grows there due to the climate, it would be the safest place to go in the entire world.
In fact, many of the "true" survivalists -- meaning scientists and such -- are establishing habitats in Southern Africa right now. This is because there is less of a chance of disease there, due to a more modern population, and still in Africa which means it is on more stable ground.
Further, it has been said that during a complete magnetic polar reversal, one of the most violent natural occurances on Earth, Africa would remain largely unaffected. Perhaps this is why Africa was not affected? Just a theory.
[edit on 27-5-2010 by lpowell0627]
Originally posted by luxordelphi
Global events are rare. Solar system wide events even rarer. Events that include deep space anomalies must have odds worse than winning a fixed lottery. The many simultaneous anomalies listed in almost every post of this thread take my breath away. If there is a pattern, it seems vast. Great thread and great posts.
Originally posted by lourui
I believe that the major tectonic shifts we felt were caused by the oil displacement currently happening in the Gulf. The oil leak is having and will continue to have global consequences. I suspect major earthquakes will be more prevalent as more pressure is shifted due to the oil leak..
Originally posted by chiponbothshoulders
Consider the possibility that things may be shifting around in the bottom of the gulf from pressure being released at that spewing oil well.
I suppose there is a reason they pump things into one as they pump oil out of it besides to force the oil to the surface.
I'm sure they are really having a heck of a time equalizing the pressure with no reference to how much oil is being released.
Just a thought....
Originally posted by savvys84
Originally posted by mrmrmikee
Heard about this giant solar flare that is about to hit us tonight or tomorrow (my birthday) with an ion cloud that will disturb cell phone calls and all that. As a physicist, I see a connection between the gravity of the sun and this simultaneous earthquake; it is a shift in space itself that earth felt, or in other words, we got a short sample of the gravity drain field at galactic axis which ripple up from the sun's influence. The sun is on galactic axis now, we are not quite there.
Very interesting topic!!!!! I'm glad you brought it to my attention.
What time was this event? And the data, was it exactly the same time everywhere?
Finally some1 of consequence here. You are on the right track mate gravity/ time waves and shift spaces. pl go on and elaborate as much and as scientifically as possible.
Im working on these physics myself
Cheers