Something very strange hit almost EVERY seismograph in the US at the same time!!!

Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
What I dont uderstand is if this is such a common thing why when the OP called a so called expert in the field they were clueless a to what was going on.

It probably depends just how soon after the event the scientist was called.

These are all dealt with by computer systems and these are what make the initial postings. Later a geologist will review the computer estimates and make changes. Not all of these changes get posted to the web.

It is perfectly possible that a scientist or geologist was not aware of the event as it occurred in a network outside AK. I am a little surprised at the reaction however I will admit, and would suggest that perhaps he was just caught on the hop.

The USGS will admit that they do have to keep on top of things since so many people are continuously watching, effectively 24 hours a day which is more man power than they can muster!

[edit on 25/5/2010 by PuterMan]

"It is perfectly normal." "These events happen all the time." "It's been a long time since we've seen this." "You can't be expected to understand this." "It is actually very normal for this time of year." "These are long cycles and the earth has gone through them many times before - nothing unusual." "No cause for alarm because this happens all the time."

I'd like to end my post with something funny but the truth is lies aren't funny and it's not funny when the evidence of our eyes is denied. I may not know exactly WHAT is wrong but persistence will bring that to light.

Originally posted by luxordelphi
"It is perfectly normal." "These events happen all the time." "It's been a long time since we've seen this." "You can't be expected to understand this." "It is actually very normal for this time of year." "These are long cycles and the earth has gone through them many times before - nothing unusual." "No cause for alarm because this happens all the time."

I'd like to end my post with something funny but the truth is lies aren't funny and it's not funny when the evidence of our eyes is denied. I may not know exactly WHAT is wrong but persistence will bring that to light.

No friggin doubt! Star for you!

I think some people may be trying to convince themselves in this one mabey??

I know i have thought about the oil spill alone, and for the first time sonce I was a kid, I am not feeling to good and trying to black this one out and puch it out of my mind.... I just don't want to look at it...

Originally posted by luxordelphi
"It is perfectly normal."

Yup it is indeed

"These events happen all the time."

Between 100 and 200 every year.

"It's been a long time since we've seen this."

About 24 hours

"You can't be expected to understand this."

No comment as I don't know if you do or not.

"It is actually very normal for this time of year."

The time of the year has very little to do with it.

"These are long cycles and the earth has gone through them many times before - nothing unusual."

Very true

"No cause for alarm because this happens all the time."

As mentioned between 100 and 200 times a year.

I'd like to end my post with something funny but the truth is lies aren't funny and it's not funny when the evidence of our eyes is denied. I may not know exactly WHAT is wrong but persistence will bring that to light.

And just who exacltly is lying? What is the evidence of your eyes, other than that a deep quake went off?

[edit on 25/5/2010 by PuterMan]

reply to post by nobody you know


wow this is very interesting! I checked it out and every site I looked at had obvious activity at the same time. Some more than others but seemed very consistent. They are not listed on the magnitude scale so this must be insignificant but odd that it was all over the world at roughly the same time.

I checked for solar flare activity and couldn't find any that was to effect earth today.
There is activity due on the 27th May 2010 -
SpaceWeather.com
"A magnetic filament on the sun erupted yesterday, May 24th, and the blast hurled a coronal mass ejection (CME) in the general direction of Earth. Shortly after the eruption, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spotted a billion-ton CME racing away from the sun: movie. NOAA forecasters say there is a 35% chance of geomagnetic activity on May 27th when the cloud delivers a glancing blow to Earth's magnetic field."
I wonder if this will cause more seismic activity?

I did notice a few large quakes in the mid-Atlantic ridge also but since its all over the world, what does it mean? I'm curious! Eathquake Watch

[edit on 25-5-2010 by violet11]

Originally posted by Sator
" I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, han mathon ne chae a han noston ned 'wilith..."

...and we know nothing about it.

The world is changed; I can feel it in the water, I can feel it in the earth, I can smell it in the air.

...Yes we do?! That's what we're all talking about!

And damn these nibiru/2012/galactic centre threads... I had a dream last night where I was with my family, and I looked to the sky and saw two midday moons, and one was different - not glare or sundogs, i could see the texture of the surface it was that close, and I started cursing the nibiru folk for being right... and it started getting closer to the earth and the utter feeling of impending doom was overwhelming, but it passed and I thought it had gone on to curve away back out... and the next day there were 2 suns in the sky, and metors started falling, and the heat was severe... Not a good way to wake up after reading these things...

You people have a medical bill to pay for now !!!! Antipsychotics are not cheap !!!

Originally posted by Aresh Troxit
The oil-spill is going on at an incredible rate, right? Usually, when they drill oil, they replace with water. It's probably not happening, so there is a big land mass that is suspended over nothing.
OP did say he was near oil-spill and that the movement was worst in his part of the world...

1) When oil is extracted it is removed from pores int he rock. It is not normally a big pocket. They pump in water to keep the formation pressure up so the oil continues to flow out.

2) If there was a massive hydrate under the sea floor it could be switching phases to gas and that could cause a collapse. The oil won't but a hydrate pocket big enough could.

reply to post by PuterMan

I like your post. Not the content, necessarily, but the form which is pleasing. Some, like me, are graphically challenged. Patterns, however, are easy to read whether they be in plaids or stars or earthquakes. We each have our strengths and our weaknesses..."A man's gotta know..."

The evidence for the eyes is available if you look up. That evidence has never been reported in the news and even on ATS is only glancingly discussed. I know it's been available to you because there was an article in the Brit press about how "normal" and "usual" it all is. The USGS earthquake report which I pull up every morning looks completely different than the same report I sometimes link to in the various threads and posts on this site. The depths are different. Mine are always even numbers of kilometers: 5, 10, 30 etc. The internet giveth and taketh away.

if you visit a site called rsoe.edis you will see something else strange that is happening. volcanic activity is very much on the rise. in the last 6 hours they have logged events at a chinese volcano and in the last few hours alaska.

the one in china has a bulge developing and dying vegetation is also noted.

reply to post by Chance321


No headache, just a cocoon feeling of floating in space.

Originally posted by dieseldave
Do you guys think that HAARP could have had anything to do with it? Or on another hand, it could be normal for the Earth to do that every so often. I don't know..

Laymen that we are, and I mean all of us, we can only decipher, rather than rely, on the syntax and evolution of the released statements. I don't suspect haarp for this 'earthquake'. Again, these are merely my own views, but I think someone took the baton from haarp, and is running faster than they ever could. Someone with a real big eyeball.

So one day all the little seismographs are put in place and here to say that it moved. But then they are here to say that they didn't move....

My insane purview says that someone wants our attention. It is a no brainer that it has to be covered up.

Yeh...happens at this time of year. Very rare, nothing unusual. blah blah blah.

Thanks for the thread, because damn sure the media won't touch it.

hahaha what a waste of space this thread is.
I read 3 pages then skipped to the end.

Puterman answered all the questions.

These size quakes set of seismographs all around the world all the time, usually the further away ones show less of a movement. The Brazil quake showed on our Karori Siesmograph for over an hour, because of the size /depth combination.

Wait till youall see a 7 or 8 magnitude quake, the whole siesmo is covered in black lines.

I can't stop laughing at all the speculation

Originally posted by davidmann
reply to post by Chance321

 

No headache, just a cocoon feeling of floating in space.

Haha, I get this too! It's an interesting feeling.

Is it significant that if you search for this event on google, the only mention of it is this thread and identical ones on a whole list of conspiracy sites? Only 1 person in the entire world noticed this, and came here to talk about it? Not very credible if you ask me.

Originally posted by Aresh Troxit
The oil-spill is going on at an incredible rate, right? Usually, when they drill oil, they replace with water. It's probably not happening, so there is a big land mass that is suspended over nothing.
OP did say he was near oil-spill and that the movement was worst in his part of the world...

The short reply to the above statement is that it's not the cause. The longer explaination is:

Oil and gas are not located in big empty pockets as many people might think, and they don't pump water back down to replace the oil removed.

Oil and gas are located in beds of fossilized sand, which if you were to look at would appear pummice like. As the oil and gas fields are actually ancient sea beds there is also sea water trapped in the fossilized sand.

When the oil is extracted there is always some sea water that comes up with the oil, and that water needs to be disposed of, so they will either separate and store the water in tanks for later dispoisal, or use a disposal well to pump it back into the ground.

Two of the terms that are used in the oil geo sciences are permeability and porocity. Porocity represents the amount of empty space in the rock, sand or sediment, or the storage capacity, and permeability measures how easily the oil and gas can flow through that material.

Another term used is frac or fraturing a well, which uses a hydraulic pump to pump fluid into the well bore and fracture the sand to increase permeability and extend the life of the well.

I realize that nobody asked for information on the oil extraction process, but to properly address the statement quoted, I felt a bit of an explanation was appropriate.

It seems as if everyone has become so focused on the earthquakes and have failed to ask the obvious. What other elements were affected during this time period of the earthquake. What about the earths gravity and electromagnetic lines of force? What about the tides in large bodies of water? If indeed some large celestial body is causing this, then all liquid sources would be affected in some way (magma, water, etc.). Yes that would include us, because we are some 90 + percent of liquid. Pitch Black is getting ready to happen, and what will you do when the lights go out? Hey Vin, I do think everyone is getting skittish!

Having been in contact with a guy who knows about these things, I'd like to post his response.

"i looked at all the link supplied pages and here is what i have to say (taken from one of my pages):

Ultimately, the ONLY source of seismograph excitation (no matter the instrument design) is ENERGY. Additionally, the ONLY thing that delivers energy to the seismometer is Earth's ACCELERATION at the site of the instrument.

This is true not only for the instrument's response to earthquake waves whose periods are shorter than about 300 s, but also for earth 'hum' in which the instrument responds mainly to tilt, when the periods are greater than about 300 to 1000 s.

the first thing i had a problem with was what was the actual time on the original post... which i finally figured out to be around 16:30 UTC as opposed to 16:30 MDT.

near the top of page six i finally found some screen shots of the original data: www.abovetopsecret.com...

and there are a couple of things i would like to point out.

there was a magnitude 6.5 in acre, brazil a little before the event mentioned in the original post ... and if you notice, the depth was in my 'interest level' because it was at 565.3km (351.3 miles), which i keep track of == meaning, 'i noticed it':

MAP 6.5 2010/05/24 16:18:28 -8.095 -71.558 565.3 ACRE, BRAZIL

the link is: earthquake.usgs.gov...

now ... if one wanders around this page: www.flyingsnail.com...

one will see various travel times i have recorded from distant earthquakes to one of my seismic station locations == also note the magnitudes of the dx quakes

everything, in regard to the (above) mentioned post, i have seen, 'looks normal' to me; however, it would appear usgs has been having some equipment problems, that did not have anything to do with the 'mentioned event': look under == USGS: Northern CA temblor unrelated to Baja quake

where there is an interesting, to say the least, usgs observation and the link is: www.flyingsnail.com...

(otoh) there are some (imo) interesting, for lack of a better word, anomalies appearing that would, sort of, go hand in hand with "earth changes" ... for example, (iirc) the haiti earthquake threw the earth a little off axis, resulting in a time variation... ;-) speaking of which, i found this comment interesting (also on page six):

"Hmm... hmm.... I wonder... there has been a lot of talk about reality splitting into two densities, the lower 3rd density vibration and the higher 4th density vibration. I can definitely testify that I have personally experienced both vibrations (one linear, one not) and they are quite different. Although that could be in my head. A timeline split definitely comes to mind in this case. I hope I didn't get left behind here in the lower density, crap.

The science behind this has to do with, in my opinion, our solar system coming closer to the galactic equator where I believe a field of energy screws with time as we get closer to it. This fits into Terrence McKenna's timewave zero theory, as theoretically, the amount of time for an idea to manifest itself in the material realm should be a reverse exponential from the distance to the December 2012 date."

if you recall, terrence used to stop by our sfo place, when he was in town, ... and we really had some great shroom chats (grin).

(fwiw) here is another seismic page i constantly check: www.emsc-csem.org... which often has different data than usgs and (imo) a good cross-reference.

hth'n'luv, ~@~

www.flyingsnail.com...


[edit on 26-5-2010 by dgwest7]

reply to post by CUin2013?


Okey, I'm gonna put this out there. I know it'll be off topic. But if I have my military time right, the 1630MDT would be about 1:30 in NY right? I was woke from a sound sleep just before 130AM having a hard time breathing. I don't have breathing problems. Has anyone else experianced anything like this at the time of this 1620/1630 event?
This is what I experienced, I posted back on pg 10. And yes, the day before I had a headache.

2 Cents...

On this European Page I found absolute no anomaly yesterday:
www.iris.edu...

And something to enhance the knowledge about possibilities:

Growing Earth:

ye really strange stuff O.o