Space Weather reports possibility of Hyder Flare

reply to post by ElectricUniverse

Here's another peer reviewed paper (a bit more recent than 1967). Very clear in its conclusions.

As a model, the research focuses on the Anatolian peninsula, presenting 41 years of historical data on magnetic storms and earthquakes collated from national and international resources. As a result of the comparative assessment of the data, it is concluded that the geomagnetic storms do not trigger earthquakes.

www.ciencias.unal.edu.co...


[edit on 5/20/2010 by Phage]

You guys turn something beautiful into boring lifeless scientific analysis. It's about as boring as watching two people discuss a kiss.

Everyone in the know, better had soak up this extra light energy. Something tells me this stream might contain some very enlightening data for the mind.

These flares can cause CME's to eject. That is a fact.

reply to post by Phage


Funny that you should post that when something like the following says differently...


www.nwra.com...

Here it is for all to see embedded.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d92b57e2c3f4.gif[/atsimg]

[edit on 20-5-2010 by ElectricUniverse]

reply to post by Visitor2012

Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions being caused by the Sun are beautiful? I guess that would depend on your point of view.

I find the Sun and its phenomena to be fascinating and beautiful. I find them no less so because I have some understanding of the mechanisms involved.

reply to post by lasertaglover
Yes.
Then they have to hit us square.
And they gotta be big.
Probabilities of catastrophe get smaller as you go down the list.

reply to post by Phage


Funny how i have posted several different research papers and quite a few are as recent, or more recent than the one you posted and you think one opposing view invalidates the several other peer-reviewed research?... You are showing an ignorance in the scientific method Phage.

[edit on 20-5-2010 by ElectricUniverse]

reply to post by ElectricUniverse

First you talked about a Hyder flare being associated with the Chile earthquake. There was no Hyder flare.

Next you talked about the CME which resulted from the Solar filament being associated with the Chile earthquake. The CME did not hit Earth.

Now you seem to be talking about sunspot numbers. Well sunspot numbers are interesting but when you compare them to earthquake activity there doesn't seem to be much of a correlation.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1d47293fcfd0.gif[/atsimg]

Everything that occurs in the universe affects everything in the universe.
It is simple really. But you boys have fun...continue.

reply to post by Phage
If there is any relationship, it looks more inverse than anything.

Dang it Phage! You and those facts again.

If you keep it up, you are going to ruin the collective fantasy some seem to have of the Earth being burned to a cinder.

I do not think the event is a fantasy, far form it. Anything is possible, it is only the arrogance of an immature species that would presume to know what is and what is not possible.

I was only complimenting phage on his matter of fact straight to the point answers and source material.

I was not detracting from the issue that one day the Earth could face solar activity we have never experienced.

We are young and the solar system is old, ours is a battered and weathered Solar system. If one looks closely into chaos, one will eventually see order.

reply to post by cindymars

I spilled my coffee this morning.
Did you feel it?

reply to post by WeMoveUnseen

We do know our Sun is very mild mannered. In observing neighbors of the same type we can be pretty sure that it won't be destroying the Earth any time soon.

However, this does not mean it can't do some real damage to us, thanks to our dependence on satellites and electric power.

There...feel better now?

reply to post by Phage


Notice how, once again as you made this same claim in the thread you made where you claimed there is no link between Solar activity and earthquakes, that there has to be a linear link between the two when research CLEARY says FLUCTUATIONS in Solar activity, EITHER UP OR DOWN have been linked as trigger mechanism for earthquakes... yet you want to claim that because there is no linear link there is no such connection?... wow, the disinformation campaign you keep waging is amazing...

reply to post by WeMoveUnseen
I was also complimenting him, tongue in cheek as it were.

Sorry for any misunderstanding. I really hadn't seen your post before I put that one up, then when I saw it, I thought 'Oh, we must think alike'.

Originally posted by Phage

We do know our Sun is very mild mannered. In observing neighbors of the same type we can be pretty sure that it won't be destroying the Earth any time soon.
.....

Wow...and Phage keeps making claims which are completely DIFFERENT from what scientists actually say....

In 1859, worldwide electrical disturbances convinced astronomers that the Sun had direct influence on Earth in ways more than the eye can see. Today, we have confirmed that realization. Dr. Alan M. Title, senior fellow at the Lockheed Martin Space Systems Advanced Technology Center, will help us get to know the Sun a bit better and to appreciate that it is a more unpredictable creature than ever thought possible.

www.nasm.si.edu...

Solar Dynamics Observatory: The 'Variable Sun' Mission

February 5, 2010: For some years now, an unorthodox idea has been gaining favor among astronomers. It contradicts old teachings and unsettles thoughtful observers, especially climatologists.

"The sun," explains Lika Guhathakurta of NASA headquarters in Washington DC, "is a variable star."

But it looks so constant...

Thats only a limitation of the human eye. Modern telescopes and spacecraft have penetrated the suns blinding glare and found a maelstrom of unpredictable turmoil. Solar flares explode with the power of a billion atomic bombs. Clouds of magnetized gas (CMEs) big enough to swallow planets break away from the stellar surface. Holes in the sun's atmosphere spew million mile-per-hour gusts of solar wind.

And those are the things that can happen in just one day.

Over longer periods of decades to centuries, solar activity waxes and wanes with a complex rhythm that researchers are still sorting out. The most famous "beat" is the 11-year sunspot cycle, described in many texts as a regular, clockwork process. In fact, it seems to have a mind of its own.
...

science.nasa.gov...

Phew, Phage wrong?....




[edit on 20-5-2010 by ElectricUniverse]

Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by Phage

 

wow, the disinformation campaign you keep waging is amazing...

Your short attention span is amazing.

First you talk about a Hyder flare that wasn't. Then you talk about a CME that wasn't (well, didn't hit Earth). Then you talk about sunspot numbers. You talk about those things being specifically and directly related to the Chile earthquake.

Now you're talking about long term fluctuations and indirect relationships.

reply to post by Phage


Naa my memory span is pretty good... Perhaps you don't understand what SOLAR ACTIVITY means... You must think it only pertains to one factor of solar activity when it encompasses MANY...

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by cindymars

 

I spilled my coffee this morning.
Did you feel it?

You bet, it made me hot.
Who starred him? On this post.

en.wikipedia.org...

I respect you Phage, just not crazy about you.

[edit on 20-5-2010 by cindymars]

reply to post by cindymars
Sorry.
I starred him.
It made me laugh.