It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by malcr
Oh please! Just because the universe follows a pattern is not an indicator of a creator. It is an indication of something very interesting for us to discover. Like all things through time man (in his ignorance) invents a god for that which he doesn't understand. Some of us are willing to admit "we don't know yet.....but we will eventually".
God(s) are for the ignorant and those who fear death.
Originally posted by novastrike81
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Contradictory much?
I'm not claiming there is no "prime mover".
post by traditionaldrummer
You linked me to the wrong post apparently.
try again
Click the top link in his post not the bottom one.
Try again.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Just as I suspected. There is no evidence to support your claim that the solar system was somehow designed and not, in fact, the result of natural laws of physics. Don't worry, I won't ask you anymore.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Just as I suspected. There is no evidence to support your claim that the solar system was somehow designed and not, in fact, the result of natural laws of physics. Don't worry, I won't ask you anymore.
As I've already said, several times now, and which you have consistently ignored, once you have demonstrated an ability to comprehend the basics, we can get on to more complex questions and answers.
Also, since we seem to be endlessly repeating things, I'm still waiting for basic evidence to support your initial assertion. You have already established that we have no rights to demand proof of counter-claims until the initial claim is supported.
To be honest, I really think you incapable of producing support for your initial assertion. Until you can, you'll not be able to understand any support for a more complex assertion.
Originally posted by postmeme
The Fibonacci sequence doesn't prove the existence of God.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by nenothtu
Who wrote the laws of physics? Is that just another of those 'it is because it is' things you just take on faith?
Nobody "wrote the laws of physics".
Despite the fact that numbers WERE created by man and obviously did evolve otherwise cavemen would be doing algebra and lucasian mathmatics a feat which is utterly hilarious to think about but still near impossible.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
I made no assertion. I've already told you this. I've simply asked for evidence for unsupported claims. You can't or won't provide it, I'm fine with that.
Also if this is true, then the question remains, which God designed it ?