It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigcountry08
Just a little fact I found interesting when I read the Op article, it stated that 210000 gallons of oil have been leaking out from the pipes everyday ( if that's really the truth) so that got me curious on what type of ratio that would be ocean water to oil. Turns out there's about
346,049,000,000,000,000,000 gallons of water in the all of the oceans.
The oil has been leaking for 20 days now.
210,000 gallons have been leaking out every day which equals a total of 4,200,000 gallons a day
Which means that the whole ocean is now 1.15% oil.
Now think about that number, it's for the whole ocean what percent do you think the Gulf of Mexico would be in itself, and if it could take up to 2 years to plug the leak what percent would it be then.
I know this fact doesn't scientifically correlate but think about it on the natural level. It only takes a blood alcohol level of around .4% to kill a human being. The ocean already has a level of 1.15% oil, and if you ask me the oceans are the blood of the earth screw with that and you're liable to shut down an organ or 2.
Originally posted by truthseeker1984
Here is a serious question:
Where do we send hair clippings to in order to help out the cleanup effort? I am currently trying to get a small group of people together in my hometown to go around to the local hair salons and barbershops to collect all the hair clippings and send them down to the gulf. Does anybody know how to donate them or send them there?
Peace be with you.
-truthseeker
Where do we send hair clippings to in order to help out the cleanup effort? I am currently trying to get a small group of people together in my hometown to go around to the local hair salons and barbershops to collect all the hair clippings and send them down to the gulf. Does anybody know how to donate them or send them there?
Originally posted by seasoul
Is it technically feasible to begin placing drilling rigs adjacent to the leak and throughout this particular reservoir, in an effort to start siphoning off the basin's capacity and reducing its pressure head?
Originally posted by MolecularPhD
reply to post by discl0sur3
This suggestion is ludicrous; the depth at which the pipe head is at would make it impossible to accomplish this task; to make matters worse BP's idea of boxing it off is just as ridiculous. You would have a better chance of using low yield underwater demolition delivered down to the gulf floor through Deepsea Rover Submersible; you place the charges 360 degrees at 20' intervals embedded in the ocean floor at a depth of 300'; the yield would be approximately 180 tons per hole; ignition of these devices all at once would create a pressure event that would press the pipe rock shut collapsing the rock pipe just below the surface. Because, the depth at which the pipe head is at is so very cold you would not have a problem with igniting the shell; and any small fractures that may occur IE.. smaller leaks would seal themselves through natural freezing of methane gas. Just one of many real solutions to the oil spill capping problem.
Respectfully
MolecularPHD
Originally posted by bigcountry08
346,049,000,000,000,000,000 gallons of water in the all of the oceans.
The oil has been leaking for 20 days now.
210,000 gallons have been leaking out every day which equals a total of 4,200,000 gallons a day
Which means that the whole ocean is now 1.15% oil.
Now think about that number, it's for the whole ocean what percent do you think the Gulf of Mexico would be in itself, and if it could take up to 2 years to plug the leak what percent would it be then.
Originally posted by discl0sur3
4:41 p.m. | Updated Officials for BP on Saturday encountered a significant setback in their efforts to attach a containment dome over a leaking well on the seabed of the Gulf of Mexico, forcing them to move the dome aside while they find another method to cap the crude oil flowing into the Gulf since April 20.
Officials discovered that gas hydrates, ice-like crystals lighter than water, had built up inside the 100-ton metal container. The hydrates threatened to make the dome buoyant, and they also plugged up the top of the dome, preventing it from being effective.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by discl0sur3
4:41 p.m. | Updated Officials for BP on Saturday encountered a significant setback in their efforts to attach a containment dome over a leaking well on the seabed of the Gulf of Mexico, forcing them to move the dome aside while they find another method to cap the crude oil flowing into the Gulf since April 20.
Officials discovered that gas hydrates, ice-like crystals lighter than water, had built up inside the 100-ton metal container. The hydrates threatened to make the dome buoyant, and they also plugged up the top of the dome, preventing it from being effective.
How can they plug up the top of the dome and expect it to be effective?
Isn't the pressure of the oil leak too high to allow for capping?
Why don't they funnel the oil upwards and collect it in ships and barges? I assume its a matter of attaching at least 5,000 ft of pipping. How long would that take........give me a break!
Originally posted by LifeInDeath
Originally posted by seasoul
Is it technically feasible to begin placing drilling rigs adjacent to the leak and throughout this particular reservoir, in an effort to start siphoning off the basin's capacity and reducing its pressure head?
That is something they've been talking about doing since this started, and they might be working on it, now, but they've said it will take 90 days for such a plan to even begin to be effective.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Why 90 days though......something ain't right!