It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

LETTER FROM NASA SCIENTIST Creates More Questions? Rogue Planet Alert!

page: 26
65
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:36 PM
link   
HOW CONVENIENT THE AHEAD VIEW IS DOWN!!!!! that in its self answers this question, is it Venus!!!!!



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:37 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:37 PM
link   
reply to post by gamma 49
 


Well Andreas Kammerer says that is wrong. Can you actually provide a citation as in where this was written? Is this your recollection or is this from a document of some sort?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:39 PM
link   
reply to post by themovement1
 


Excuse me, but put on the thinking cap and realize that this in no way makes a statement about the condition of the camera. Drawing such a conclusion is why this thread is full of people unable to understand the simple issue that the object in the image is Venus.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:40 PM
link   
and to those individuals who said the media and nasa would never fib to us about anything like this ..... what now



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:41 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


I saw a vid showing as venus orbits around the sun its path takes it behind the son correct.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:43 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by themovement1
first of all. disclosur3 thank you for alerting us to a possible threat . second i can understand normal debate on this subject in order to find a solution. but these current people that insist that it is Venus and you truly believe it, why do you not just leave the thread and thank your lucky stars you know the answer? why are you still here insisting that everyone else is wrong? why not let them be the judge and come to there own conclusion. just my opinion! why create a argumentative atmosphere. when the people that you are opposing just want the truth, and apparently not the answer you believe to be true. you have stated your opinion now leave the thread and let us come to are own conclusion thank you.


Thank you for your kind words but I just want to clarify that I've never told anyone that they were wrong...I'm open to any possibility at this point.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:45 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:46 PM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 

yes look under the heading"our busy solar system'.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:47 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 

so has Venus been ruled out disclosur3? or still up in the air, and what do you think about the core camera being offline?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by themovement1
 


Excuse me, but put on the thinking cap and realize that this in no way makes a statement about the condition of the camera. Drawing such a conclusion is why this thread is full of people unable to understand the simple issue that the object in the image is Venus.


Do you ever have anything positive to say? Honestly, your arrogant, reiterated rants are getting really old. Please move on if you have nothing new to add to this discussion...



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:48 PM
link   
reply to post by themovement1
 


Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the camera itself is down?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:49 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 

Once again, SOHO is not the same as STEREO.

It is not at all uncommon for data transmissions from the STEREO satellites to be delayed.


[edit on 4/26/2010 by Phage]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by themovement1
reply to post by discl0sur3
 

so has Venus been ruled out disclosur3? or still up in the air, and what do you think about the core camera being offline?

I don't believe that ANYTHING has been ruled out at this point. We'll just have to wait and see ultimately. The camera being switched off amidst all this speculation I find curious to say the least.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:51 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


What's your problem? I have been posting a lot of evidence that shows this to be Venus. On the other hand I see very little coming out from the other side of this discussion such as support for the mass of the NEAT comet.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by themovement1
hey disclosur3 how do you edit your signature on here? im new here .

In the ATS store, welcome...hope this helps.


[edit on 26-4-2010 by discl0sur3]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:51 PM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


not at the moment no. but term no data suggests that it is infact offline rite?


[edit on 26-4-2010 by themovement1]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:52 PM
link   
reply to post by gamma 49
 


Please provide a link to support your claim.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 

this is where i am getting this from .



new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join