LETTER FROM NASA SCIENTIST Creates More Questions? Rogue Planet Alert!

reply to post by daz__

Wiski sky has a blocked object,I can't remember the declination if you look in the infrared
this object has a long tail,this is somthing we all should be looking

reply to post by gamma 49


Hey to lighten the mood I added a signature to my posts....I have to laugh out loud nowadays at every thread where there is a question of what we are looking at in our universe! It never fails either! I recently watched a thread and just waited for Phage to come in and say "Venus" and he did. Well, not this one, he was, can I say this out loud, wrong, but anyway, thought I'd share a little light humor everyone's way!
Sunny

The personal sniping stops here.

Thank you.

So here it is again, proof that the object is Venus;

Compare these too images...

July 15, 2008
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/136a04f0e2d4.png[/atsimg]

April 21, 2010
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/788ea7a7e9bd.png[/atsimg]


...100% identical. This is because they are both Venus.

Anyone still supporting the OP's claims best check their selves.

It's not Venus folks. Venus would be moving from left to right relative to the satellite's view, not right to left as the mystery object is doing.

reply to post by tOhNeE


Ahead cor 2 does not match up other example. One's much higher than the other.

reply to post by Supernatural


WRONG.

Venus rotates counterclockwise around the Sun, while the planet itself rotates clockwise around it's axis.

en.wikipedia.org...

This Orbit tool is accurate, and proves your claim is incorrect.
stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

The fact that your post got a star tells a lot about the people who are reading this topic.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by tOhNeE]

reply to post by gamma 49


That is because they are both taken at different times of the year, and because the satellites themselves are also in a different position.

Your highly illogical conclusion that the two objects are different because they are in different spots is based solely on lack of acknowledgement of certain facts.

When I asked to compare the images, I meant the way they LOOK. Not their position.

Obviously you are fishing for every possible thing you can to support your illogical conclusions that this is not Venus. You are going to continually fail at debunking me because I have the truth on my side and you don't. I will effortlessly prove you wrong from here on out as long as you continue to believe the object is not Venus.

reply to post by tOhNeE


At that distance that is a huge differnce,I think not

reply to post by discl0sur3


There are repeated mistakes in the analysis of the video in which inferences are made about the 3d structure from a 2d image. The inferences are not valid. You don't have sufficient information to determine the shape. The claims of shape change, pumping energy, other comments are not justified by what is observed in the video. All you see there are image compression artifacts around Venus. The little light arc that appears to be stable in the image is likely a fiber from debris.

This is much ado about nothing.

Why didn't nasa mention the neat comet had the same mass as the moon,and they believe it is one of the predecessor to nibiru.

reply to post by discl0sur3


Here is the original statement by allprowolfy

if this image was mercury any astronomy major knows that mercury rolls in the opposite direction of the terrestrial planets

I certainly know what a retrograde motion is and a retrograde orbit. All planets exhibit retrograde motions since all planets travel at different rates around the sun.

I do not think that the post by allprowolfy refers to retrograde motions.

reply to post by daz__


Planets do not have tails.

Originally posted by dotkix
what is this about? a defective camera lens or alien invasion!

stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

First thing that came into mind after viewing the image was this old thread about an "alien factory" in the skunk works section.


Here's a link to that thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...


EDIT: another image
www.abovetopsecret.com...



Just for the record.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by smirnoffsky]

[edit on 26-4-2010 by smirnoffsky]

reply to post by gamma 49


It's quite clear that the NEAT comet did not have the same mass as the moon. I have seen all sorts of odd claims for the NEAT comet including that it was 4x Jupiter, 2x Jupiter and now the same mass as the moon.

Do you have a source for your claim that the NEAT comet had the same mass as the moon?