It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It then gets even more interesting, with Turkey shifting away from the west and to the east, what role America will play in Turkey, especially NATO. This also ties into the issues it has with Greece and Cyprus, both members of the EU and Greece obviously part of NATO.
Just as an aside,does anyone know how Turkey got its name? Are they the only nation on earth named after A BIRD?
'Turkey was named for the Turks, believe it or not. Turk can mean either 'a citizen of the modern state of Turkey' or more broadly, 'an individual of the Turkic-speaking people.' The many Turkic languages are spoken not only in Turkey but also in a large area of central Asia and in northern Siberia. The real question is the origin of the name Turk. The word is essentially the same in many languages, including English, Turkish, Arabic, and Persian (Farsi). It probably comes from some Turkish root, but there's no consensus on which one. It may be one root meaning 'strong' or 'vigorous' (according to the American Heritage Dictionary) or it may be another meaning 'the people' (according to the Encyclopedia Americana).
There are a couple of other theories of how the country got its name, both wrong. The first has it that the country was named after the first leader of the Turkish Republic, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. But like most Turks, Mustafa didn't have any surname at all until 1934, when he chose Ataturk ('Father of the Turks') for himself. He had already given the country its western-influenced name Turkiye several years earlier. During the period of the empire, the Turkish name for the country had nothing to do with the Turks. Rather, it was named for the Osman (Ottoman) dynasty that ruled it. Another theory has it that the English named the country after the bird, as a taunt. But the country was already called 'Turki' or 'Turkeye' in English by 1275, hundreds of years before the bird was known in the Old World.
Originally posted by BLV12
It then gets even more interesting, with Turkey shifting away from the west and to the east, what role America will play in Turkey, especially NATO. This also ties into the issues it has with Greece and Cyprus, both members of the EU and Greece obviously part of NATO.
Originally posted by plumranch
Turkey is setting itself up as the regional hegemony (major regional power) to be dealt with on any given issue. All nearby powers, the EU, Russia, the Baltic states will be affected. The challenge will be to limit this hegemony as much as possible to maintain a reasonable balance of power.
Originally posted by BLV12
Not even going to bother replying to the fools above who think they are experts on matters they only just realised existed.
Originally posted by paraphi
But you assume what you say is correct, which is not. Turkey remains committed to EU membership and continues to change domestic institutions to that end. It is not in Turkey’s interest (both economically through the close dependencies with EU states and militarily through their integration with NATO) for them to shift away from the West. Turkey may be focussing more on Middle Eastern affairs which is good because Turkey offers a voice of moderation. Iran is a major nation in the Middle East so it makes sense for Turkey and Iran to come to an accommodation, although one wonders whether this is more to do with the Kurds than any sense of shared values. That said, Iran is a direct competator and a threat and both nations hold a different world view and outlook - Turkey being a democracy for a start!
I agree, and Turkish leadership will be vital in knocking some sense into much of the nonsense that has plagued the Middle East for many years. In the great scheme of things Turkey is a balancing influence and everyone will be effected if they can bring positivity to the table.
I don’t think I should let this one go as I think you may have been referring to me. If you state opinionated and ill-sourced anti-Turkish gibberish, like:
> “... the Israeli's alone will mop the floor with Turkey” and
> “At the end of the day, if Turkey tries anything, it will be torn a part in a more violent way then Yugoslavia was”, and as you get more excited about a war between Israel and Turkeywhich you seem to crave and be longing for
> “Israel will call on Greece to back it up, and Greece will”
You should sit back and appreciate that you are not the expert you purport to be.
The facts are that Turkey is merely asserting themselves against Israel, something that many nations do through actions and words. It’s no big deal. The OP covers a flotilla of ships to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza. This flotilla will have supporters from many nations – it is not just a Turkish thing and it won’t lead to the war that you seem to want!
Regards
Originally posted by BLV12
LOL the last part made me burst out laughing.
Originally posted by BLV12
Turkey is not a democracy, not in the sense western countries are democracies. Turkey is more like a hybrid between a military dictatorship and democratic government with limits..the limits are they can do what they want, as long as they don't piss off the military over lords, because if they do, they get removed from power. It has happened several times.
Well, you may think I'm wrong, but your just another outsider who reads a few articles and then thinks he has become an expert.
Originally posted by BLV12
Turkey is not interested in joining the European Union any more.
Originally posted by BLV12
Turkey offering a voice of moderation is almost as funny as your last line above.
Moderation you say? They have taken the hard line against their so called ally Israel. They are behaving like fanatical Islamists, because deep down, that's what they are.
Originally posted by BLV12
More LOL's.
Turkey is not going to bring balance or sense to the problems in the Middle East.
It's idea of "mediating" is to lash out at Israel publicly, and to side with Iran and oppose sanctions, and then go and make under the table deals.
You are extremely naive.
Originally posted by BLV12
I've got more of an understanding of the region I come from, then some random outsider who reads a couple articles, watches FOX, CNN, and the rest of the propaganda media networks, and then goes around the Internet making an ass out of him self by trying to tell people that they don't know anything about where they come from.
If you have no understanding of the region, which you don't, then keep quiet. Go talk about Obama, tea party's, and whatever else is going on in America that concerns Americans, and leave topics you don't have a clue about to those who know what they are talking about.
Originally posted by BLV12
You're so naive mate, seriously take some advice and leave this topic to those who actually know what they are talking about.
Originally posted by 23432
Turks have no reason to start a war with anyone .
But if attacked , then it is a different story all together .
Israel's problem is not the Turks . It is with Arabs .
In fact many pregnant Israelis have been travelling to Turkey to have their kids born in Turkey so that they have a dual citizenship .
Current disagreements between the Turks & Israelis are not that important .
Oh , the Turks are the only people with their own agents in Mossad .
Let's not forget who the Khazar's were and who rules the roost in Israel .
It is in fact funny that the Greek nationalists can be so blind to facts .
Israel is going to attack Turks and Greeks going to join in ?
ha ha ha
Originally posted by BLV12
You don't even know the ruling party, it's called AKP. A and P are on different sides of the keyboard, so don't even try the "typo" excuse.
Originally posted by BLV12
This very tiny fact is just a highlight of what I've been saying all along, that outsiders like you go around acting like your experts on everything and everyone else and their country's, yet you wouldn't know the first thing about those country's without having to look them up first.
Originally posted by 23432
reply to post by BLV12
Dear Greeks , pls stop this nonsense about Turks wanting a war and expansion .
It ain't the TRUTH .
Originally posted by paraphi
Yes typo, live with it. I don’t reference your typos. If that’s the only thing you can rail against then that's progress.
Like I said, try to be civil. I think that others in this thread can judge whether your views on Turkey are one-sided and opinionated with a lack of objectivity; after all, you keep talking about the forthcoming war when Turkey will be destroyed.
You should try not to let your mistrust and dislike of Turkey cloud your judgement, especially as both the Greek and Turkish governments are working so hard to rectify many years of mistrust and bad feeling. I would hope that better Greek / Turkish relations will lead to positive progress over Cyprus which is (as you know) one area Turkey must address as part of their EU membership prerequisites.
Regards
Originally posted by BLV12
Oh, I could go through and destroy you posts. But I've got better things to do then sit here and debate whether I am right or wrong with someone who is clueless to the big picture.
Originally posted by paraphi
Give it a rest. This thread has been ruined by your anti-Turkish opinions, however well founded you may think them to be - and I know they have foundation, so I am not out to discredit what you say.
The thread was about the shift of politics between Turkey and Israel and should not have given voice to your well rehersed dislike and mistrust you have against Turkey, based (I assume) on your own worldview and experience.
It is bad form to accuse people of being clueless and naive because they hold a contrary view than you, but then that type of behaviour is often associated with a poor ability to debate and back up one's position with fact.
Regards
[edit on 24/5/2010 by paraphi]