Japanese Have Washington Post Running Scared over 9/11

The writer of that article seems to be almost hysterical almost like he can't believe that someone of Fujita Yukihisa's stature would have the nerve to question the US. after all we have done for them!!! that's what I got from the article.

reply to post by impressme


My question is; Why do you care about the Washington ComPost anyways? That rag is clearly being used as a propaganda tool to sway the beliefs of the people. This just proves there is something in a name, Washington Compost is just that, a pile of sheesh.

reply to post by Amagnon


I would definatley agree with that the media does try and show you how things are "supposed" to be makes one wonder about all the impending apocolypse movies in the theaters and on the history channel etc as of late but thats another subject entirely

when the 9/11 truth does actually come out
and is disclosed, does that mean we will have
less gov sponsored trolls here???

Matt Bellamy, lead singer of British band Muse, was the first person I knew who claimed 9/11 to be an inside job. I doubted he was right, but I did consider his point of view and it also got me interested in conspiracy theories in general.

Now Mr. Fujita, a prominent Japanese man, has claimed 9/11 was an inside job. And looking at the hysterical response of the Washington Post, I am seriously considering re-considering my views on 9/11... because as we all know, the Japanese are frighteningly precise and refined in their thinking. When a Japanese guy comes out with a bold statement like this, I'm all ears.

External content....but very important...look at these names...!!As mentioned on page one...



Most Americans don't know what kind of people 9/11 truthers really are. So they can't figure out whether or not they are dangerous.

Below is a list of people who question what our Government has said about 9/11.

The list proves - once and for all - that people who question 9/11 are dangerous.

Email this list to everyone you know, to prove to them that 9/11 truthers are all dangerous nut cases.

Senior intelligence officers:
Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers". He also said that the government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that "very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been", that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there's enough evidence to justify a new, "hard-hitting" investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath (see this and this).

A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.

A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. ... All three [buildings that were destroyed in the World Trade Center] were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings before 9/11." (and seethis).

A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about “serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were ignored)

20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer (David Steele) stated that "9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war", and it was probably an inside job (scroll down to Customer Review dated October 7, 2006).

A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called "perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that "the evidence points at" 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job

The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 - 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 - 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said "The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup."

Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland. Former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency, former military attaché in China, with a 21-year career in U.S. Army Intelligence (Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army) questions the government's version of the events of 9/11.
Congressmen:
According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House(confirmed here)

Current Democratic U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy said "The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush's watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?"

Current Republican Congressman Ron Paul calls for a new 9/11 investigationand states that "we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on"

Current Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich hints that we aren't being told the truth about 9/11

Current Republican Congressman Jason Chafetz says that we need to be vigilant and continue to investigate 9/11

Former Democratic Senator Mike Gravel states that he supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don't know the truth about 9/11

Former Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffee endorses a new 9/11 investigation

Former U.S. Democratic Congressman Dan Hamburg says that the U.S. government "assisted" in the 9/11 attacks, stating that "I think there was a lot of help from the inside"

Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job
9/11 Commissioners:
The Commission's co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements (free subscription required)

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting"

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up"

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ."

And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) - who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry - recently said "At some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened". He also said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."
Other government officials:
U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said "We've never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I've seen that for a long time."

Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who's who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11

Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says "The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence."

The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility

President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff Latas) is a member of a group which doubts the government's version of 9/11

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is "the dog that doesn't hunt"

Cont..

The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission

Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated: "If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot—I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to—if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason!"
Numerous other politicians, judges, legal scholars, and attorneys also question at least some aspects of the government's version of 9/11.


No wonder, given the importance and stature of the people mentioned above,people from all over the world, including Japan, can see the ridiculousness of the Official Story and are calling for a new investigation.

reply to post by benoni


Great work, benoni.,if this had been a thread instead of post,I'm sure the flags would be waving for you !!!

reply to post by metro


Hilarious point.

Even more hilarious sig. Thanks for the laugh.

reply to post by The Baby Seal Club


To be fair, I understand your comment. There's probably wishful thinking on my part. If 9/11 was exposed it would open up a can of worms in terms of our Government's legitimacy throughout history - I'm surprised there are people who actually find their government legit in the first place really.

I have to agree, sadly, the conditions are there for retaliation. The more people see through the official story the higher the risk of retilation from within. 9/11 has endorsed terrorism from parties outwith the country and within the country. I'm pretty sure the 'illuminati' expect a pool of conspiracy theorists for any act they try to conceal, however I think this pool is getting too deep for them and they know it. There is far too much information available for this lie to exist.

In the meantime let's remember the real people who were involved in the 9/11 cover up, are still out there. And I think many people know who they are.

[edit on 9-3-2010 by IrnBruFiend]

Loose Change director interviewed for new Invisible Empire film:

Jason Bermas announces his new New World Order film

www.youtube.com...#

reply to post by SaturnFX

Do you think, maybe, thats the point?

The article could have been written as a form of 'reverse psychology'?

Any time you see someone being so obviously slandered you have to assume it is a form of psychological warfare. Then the second part, the fact this paper is anonymous should be ringing alarm bells in your head.

Think about it this way: if I was a 9-11 truther and want to make people consider my position, how could I get people to focus on it?

Make them sympathise with someone on your side (Fujita). Attack him anonymously and make it seem like your opponent did it. People will then sympathise with him and at least consider your point of view.

Very simple psychological 'false flag'.

reply to post by benoni


Excellent post Benoni.

Although it has likely been mentioned before, this is from 911myths.com

Money allocated for the 1986 Challenger disaster investigation: $75 million

Money allocated for the 2004 Columbia disaster investigation: $50 million

Money allocated for Clinton-Lewinsky investigation: $40 million

Money allocated for the 9/11 Commission: $14 million


A BJ for the president gets a 40 million dollar investigation and 9-11 only gets 14 million. Mind blowing. How is that even possible?

14 million is nothing when talking about govt expenditures. There is no reason not to have a full investigation. Not a commission, but an honest investigation done by law enforcement and experts from every required discipline.

These people should have roots as far from Washington DC as possible.

We owe it to ourselves, and we owe it to the fallen...those who fell that day, and those who are still falling.

Great OP Impressme.

.

[edit on 10-3-2010 by Aircow]

Well, I'm only on page one just now but have seen so many star worthy posts already I've logged in specifically to give them.
I also want to say unfortunately, uh oh, so many stars per so many worthy,fed up,frustrated,posts,
and only page one so far (for me), this thread's guaranteed to be used though web spiders to further the global internet censorship.
Unfortunately as we unite in spirit and consciousness with knowledge acquisition and sharing via our interconnectivity on the internet, so TPTB are alerted to the fact the people are waking up.
Expect things to speed up in the information/freedom of speech suppression area REAL soon.
...Like yesterday.

S+F for the intelligence and the passion this thread has brought to the surface with so many.

reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread550078/pg1#pid8286021]post by impressme would be good/url]


And just to add to refer to the OP, You MSM journalists should be sooooo ashamed of yourselves . I am adding this because I know you are reading this thread and it's high time you heard US instead of cramming BS down OUR throats for a change and treating us like moronic imbecile zombies.Where is your integrity ? your self esteem, your humanity,your fellowship in man, brotherhood, sisterhood,just some god damn NON-PARTISANSHIP and TRUTH, REPORTING....where is it?!
Pahhh!

Originally posted by boondock-saint
when the 9/11 truth does actually come out
and is disclosed, does that mean we will have
less gov sponsored trolls here???

All you have to do is look at what happened when the truth about the JFK assassination came out. The same thing will happen here.

Oh, that's right... the truth never did come out. Then again, the same thing will happen here. You could have video evidence of Dick Cheney sitting in a room with Osama Bin Laden discussing the entire outline of the war and people would still deny it.

If the truth movement ends up building enough momentum TPTB will just have to work harder to either discredit or distract the populace. I for one don't underestimate the lengths that they will go to to change the subject. You guys are crazy if you think they will just throw up their hands and say "OK, you got us!"

Originally posted by ugie1028
question is, how long will the media keep on pushing the official lie?

IMO its having the reverse effect.

instead of getting their viewers to buy what their selling hook-line-sinker, its having a complete reverse effect.

the people are wising up.

*You and me will all go down in history with a sad statue of liberty, and a generation that didn't agree*
-SOAD

You are absolutely correct there !
(I was going to say, "...on the money there"
but that's the whole point isn't it?
Journalism has sunk down the toilet because for MSM journalists, it's not about truth, it's about a pay check.
Go on, msm, prove me wrong , I dare you....
I'd be the first to be grateful if you did and slap you on the back with acknowledgement.

If the government was to be exposed about 9/11, they would hit the usa with another terrorist attack before they would have to answer any questions. So when you get articles likes 9/11 truthers are dangerous, its really a shot across the bow. We are dangerous because if we trap the government in a corner, they'll retaliate with something bigger than 9/11. Then the people will once again, hate the terrorist. All they need is a distraction and all attention goes away from the government. The real truth about 9/11 will never be learned because they have gotten rid of enough evidence to point fingers. It's sad but true. So my question is, do we really want to keep trying to prove 9/11 was a lie? Even at the cost of thousands more lives?

Originally posted by cpdaman

Stephanies imagine... that isreal's MOSSAD is linked directly to 911....with the help of a ROGUE CIA agent and a ADMIN official.....now how will AIPAC responds....how will JINSA respond....how will the public respond.....this can't come out....and it won't.

Why MOSSAD? What would Israel gain by the 9-11 attacks?

I don't think they were directly linked.

reply to post by Wang Tang


Could your ATS handle have any thing to do with this assessment?
lol There Is room for you here with us truthers.
Folks are shipping over by the drove. 911 trolls and hacks are rampant here as well.
I spent time in Tachikowa and share your respect for the Japanese.
There are truly amazing thruthers on this site.