John Lear 2007 "Disclosures" already known to G.H.REES from the 80's

reply to post by zaiger

Do your Own research
ATS: Search Tool.(look UP)

Zelong.

Originally posted by noangels


There was a lot of things John said that i couldnt agree on,but some like the soul catcher and moon mining has a possible ring of truth to it

"soul catcher" is True as I Know, We do go up to the sky(them say)BUT than we are used for Energy, fuel (Bloody Oath my thing/worry)

Energy is Energy, This is what We would like on Earth. Same ThinG.



Zelong.

reply to post by SkepticOverlord


The trouble is mate You and the other site owners here allowed John to be be net bullied-The modding was not up to standard considering he was one of the big names on this site.If I was in his shoes and recieved the same treatment I would have walked.You all showed him no respect in allowing the pack to attack at any time

apart from that your all great blokes!lol this is a great site and Im happy to be a member-the JL incident left a sour taste in my mouth,as it did to many

reply to post by Zelong



Yeah true mate,Monroe comes up with some other good angles too

A race of beings have been harvesting our emotions since day one,with machines spread out over the world.These beings dont want us to evolve into the next dimension(2012) and are doing their best to keep us firmly in this realm by making sure our vibrational freqs stay out of sync with the cosmos.Perhaps the digital smog of the media arm,is keeping us from going into the next higher realm

Originally posted by noangels
The trouble is mate You and the other site owners here allowed John to be be net bullied-The modding was not up to standard considering he was one of the big names on this site.

I know some may want to revise history, but that's clearly not the case.

We (most notably Springer) warned Mr. Lear that his exceptionally extraordinary claims, backed up by only his say-so, would open himself up to an exceptional amount of intense responses ranging from highly-challenging questions to outright anger at his perceived audacity. Since the worst of the attacks were often removed, most members would be unaware of those who were actioned in their manner of response to Mr. Lear.

However, it was his decision to participate in his own dedicated forum (where he ran his own ads) despite our concerns and prior warnings that it may get intense. While some may consider the often rapid-fire challenges as "net-bullying," I don't see it that way (many members simply didn't believe anything he said), and he was fully-aware of what he was getting himself into.

More has been posted on the subject here, here and here.