It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

PROOF that Building 7 was demolished with explosives!!!

page: 91
154
<< 88  89  90    92  93  94 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 2 2010 @ 04:32 PM
link   
reply to post by iamcpc1
 


Who gives a sh*t about eardrums? If the building was brought down by a government beside Al Quada they wouldn't use regular demolition techniques as they don't want their fingerprints all over the crime scene.

Is this not understandable?

This is probably why Nano-thermite has been found in the rubble. A substance so specialized that most people haven't even heard of it, and OS people try to relate it to reptilian shape-shifting because they don't want to confront it.

Your eardrum argument, while logically reasonable, does not apply here.

Yours,

THE AQUARIAN 1



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 04:36 PM
link   
reply to post by gavron
 


This is a totally ridiculous line of reasoning. Demo teams did not rig WTC 7 on 9/11. If the building was rigged at all it would have occurred weeks prior to the day of the attacks.

All this information has been covered on this thread.

[edit on 2-5-2010 by THE AQUARIAN 1]



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 04:41 PM
link   
 




 



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   
reply to post by gavron
 


Show me a steel reinforced high rise collapsing from fire. It's never occurred, not EVER.

As I said before, if building 7 was rigged at all it was rigged before September 11th. You guys throw up these ridiculous straw man arguments because you don't want to deal with the more difficult problems with OS.

Next, I am sure, we will hear about mini-nukes and laser beam technology.



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 04:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1

This is probably why Nano-thermite has been found in the rubble.


LMAO.

Both Jones and Harritt have claimed that the nanu-nanu-thermite was used to set off conventional explosives.

Now what?

You gonna scrape together the $800 necessary to publish a similar "peer reviewed article" that refutes them?



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 04:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Joey Canoli
 


Send me a PM with the contents of this post.



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 04:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Joey Canoli
 


I'm having trouble recognizing the point of your post. Please elaborate your thesis.



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 05:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1

I'm having trouble recognizing the point of your post. Please elaborate your thesis.


It ain't complicated hoss.

Read Harritt's paper. He advocates TONS of explosives being used.

Conventional exploives.

Loud explosives.

NOT Hush-a-Booms.

No appeals to majic stuff from the military.



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 05:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1

This is a totally ridiculous line of reasoning. Demo teams did not rig WTC 7 on 9/11. If the building was rigged at all it would have occurred weeks prior to the day of the attacks.



REMISNE says otherwise.

It's NOT Gavron's thoughts. He's pointing out the ridiculousness of it.

Good to see that you are on the side of reason on this issue, and are not advocating that explosive trained Ninjas did it......



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   
reply to post by THE AQUARIAN 1
 


Neither nano-thermite nor any other thermite was found in the rubble. Jones' paper is self-contradictory and poorly done. The concept that 10 tons of red paint chips is somehow thermitic fuse is ludicrous, especially because the purported fuse refuses to stay lit after ignition by an oxy-torch.



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 07:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Joey Canoli
 


I've read the paper. The only thing they prove is nano-thermite. Their theories are irrelevant.



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 07:46 PM
link   
reply to post by pteridine
 


I think I had you on block before, let me just hit this button......uh...there.



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 09:51 PM
link   
reply to post by THE AQUARIAN 1
 



Originally posted by pterdine
Neither nano-thermite nor any other thermite was found in the rubble. Jones' paper is self-contradictory and poorly done. The concept that 10 tons of red paint chips is somehow thermitic fuse is ludicrous, especially because the purported fuse refuses to stay lit after ignition by an oxy-torch.


A gift, to you...."THE AQUARIAN".

It bears repeating.

Now, please hit the 'iggy' button on me, too. Thing is, ALL OF THE OTHER people who stumble into this thread will read EVERY post....unless, of cxourse, they choose to "deny ignorance" as well....



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 09:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1
This is a totally ridiculous line of reasoning. Demo teams did not rig WTC 7 on 9/11. If the building was rigged at all it would have occurred weeks prior to the day of the attacks.

All this information has been covered on this thread.


I'm sure the building was rigged before 9/11.....and it was just pure "luck" that debris from the WTC impacts just happened to hit WTC7.

Ya....suuuuure



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 09:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1

I've read the paper. The only thing they prove is nano-thermite. Their theories are irrelevant.


OIC.

So since they're the lead charlatans on this issue, all that matters is when they say something that you agree with.

And when they say something that contradicts your statement, they're thwron into the garbage.

Cool thing, that cognitive dissonance....



posted on May, 3 2010 @ 06:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
ok, that's not how you worded what you said.


Yes it is, you need to read post before responding


So, the fire chief gave the order. Which order is that? To clear the area? No problem with that. However, you have no proof that he ordered a demolition crew to bring down WTC7.


Well if the firemen were cleared out of the area then he could have only been talking about the building when Silverstein stated the fire commander decided to PULL IT.



posted on May, 3 2010 @ 08:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well if the firemen were cleared out of the area then he could have only been talking about the building when Silverstein stated the fire commander decided to PULL IT.


Sorry, this statement has been proven wrong multiple times....even by a source YOU provided!

This was your own source:

www.jod911.com...

Assertion number 7

Thanks again for showing us all that source, Roger


[edit on 3-5-2010 by gavron]



posted on May, 3 2010 @ 08:49 AM
link   
reply to post by THE AQUARIAN 1
 


Well, once again I am being blocked by someone who is unable to face the fact that, in spite of the "PROOF...explosives!!!" title of this thread, there is still no proof of explosives, thermite, thermate, cold chisels, hacksaws, or dull Boy Scout axes in the collapse of WTC#7.


[edit on 5/3/2010 by pteridine]



posted on May, 3 2010 @ 03:08 PM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


You're right, I don't want to read ignorant and repetitiously illogical statements.



posted on May, 3 2010 @ 03:10 PM
link   
reply to post by pteridine
 


Yeah, I'd expect to find Boy Scout knives in the demolition of the World Trade Center towers.

Did you expect to find the corpses of reptilian shape-shifters as well? You talk about them often.



new topics

top topics



 
154
<< 88  89  90    92  93  94 >>

log in

join