It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1
This is probably why Nano-thermite has been found in the rubble.
Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1
I'm having trouble recognizing the point of your post. Please elaborate your thesis.
Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1
This is a totally ridiculous line of reasoning. Demo teams did not rig WTC 7 on 9/11. If the building was rigged at all it would have occurred weeks prior to the day of the attacks.
Originally posted by pterdine
Neither nano-thermite nor any other thermite was found in the rubble. Jones' paper is self-contradictory and poorly done. The concept that 10 tons of red paint chips is somehow thermitic fuse is ludicrous, especially because the purported fuse refuses to stay lit after ignition by an oxy-torch.
Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1
This is a totally ridiculous line of reasoning. Demo teams did not rig WTC 7 on 9/11. If the building was rigged at all it would have occurred weeks prior to the day of the attacks.
All this information has been covered on this thread.
Originally posted by THE AQUARIAN 1
I've read the paper. The only thing they prove is nano-thermite. Their theories are irrelevant.
Originally posted by gavron
ok, that's not how you worded what you said.
So, the fire chief gave the order. Which order is that? To clear the area? No problem with that. However, you have no proof that he ordered a demolition crew to bring down WTC7.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Well if the firemen were cleared out of the area then he could have only been talking about the building when Silverstein stated the fire commander decided to PULL IT.