PROOF that Building 7 was demolished with explosives!!!

reply to post by REMISNE


...but you were responding to iamcpc1's post, where he was discussing crews going into WTC7. Your post then is just saying there were men with hard hats in the area.

Why mention the men with hard hats if it was not in direct relation to iamcpc1's post? That just doesn't make any sense whatsoever, Roger.

Originally posted by gavron
Why mention the men with hard hats if it was not in direct relation to iamcpc1's post? That just doesn't make any sense whatsoever

Well its pretty much common sense that if the hard hat workers are comming out saying the building is comming down their is a good chance they were in the building.

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well its pretty much common sense that if the hard hat workers are comming out saying the building is comming down their is a good chance they were in the building.

Umm, that's not what you said earlier:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
ok...so are you now saying demo teams were there, but didn't enter the buildings?

No, i am stating what i posted, you are the one who keeps trying to change things and put words in my mouth.

Have to look at facts again.

1. I never stated the demo teams went into the buildings.

2. I have stated and proven that there were hard hat workers comming out of the collapse zone, (not in the building).

3. I hav stated and proven that demo teams were at the site by 3PM.

SO, which is it, Roger. Were these hard hat workers in the building or not? Were you lying then or now?

Originally posted by gavron
SO, which is it, Roger. Were these hard hat workers in the building or not? Were you lying then or now?

Yes by common sense the hard hat workers were in the building.

Now as far as if they were demo teams or a mix of teams we do not know.



[edit on 1-5-2010 by REMISNE]

So, they were just a group of men wearing hard hats...in the area. Maybe it was "Wear your hardhat day" ?

oooookay....

Originally posted by gavron
So, they were just a group of men wearing hard hats...in the area. Maybe it was "Wear your hardhat day" ?

oooookay....

I am not responding to posts that you just make up. If it continues i will notify the mods.

Originally posted by gavron
So, they were just a group of men wearing hard hats...in the area. Maybe it was "Wear your hardhat day" ?

oooookay....

Ya never know...

Hard Hat Day

Other Hard Hat Day

Originally posted by REMISNE
I am not responding to posts that you just make up. If it continues i will notify the mods.

Making up?

You're the one who mentioned hardhats, remember, Roger? You mentioned them here:

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well its pretty much common sense that if the hard hat workers are comming out saying the building is comming down their is a good chance they were in the building.

and here:

Originally posted by REMISNE
Yes by common sense the hard hat workers were in the building.

Now as far as if they were demo teams or a mix of teams we do not know.

What am I making up? I'm posting your own quotes.

Remember

Originally posted by gavron
What am I making up? I'm posting your own quotes.

Making up something about it being hard hat day.

Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
What am I making up? I'm posting your own quotes.

Making up something about it being hard hat day.

You're the one saying there were workers wearing hard hats, and insinuating they were demo teams....but in other posts say demo teams didnt enter the buildings.

You sound confused.

Plus, K J Gunderson was kind enough to post two links indeed showing there are "hard hat" days. Thanks for the link!

So it is not that far fetched after all, is it Roger?

Originally posted by gavron
You're the one saying there were workers wearing hard hats, and insinuating they were demo teams....but in other posts say demo teams didnt enter the buildings

I am not saying anything, the video clearly shows the people are wearing hard hats and are comming out of the safety zone for building 7.

END OF STORY.

Originally posted by gavron
You're the one saying there were workers wearing hard hats, and insinuating they were demo teams....but in other posts say demo teams didnt enter the buildings

I am not saying anything, the video clearly shows the people are wearing hard hats and are comming out of the safety zone for building 7.

END OF STORY.

Originally posted by REMISNE
Im not saying anything, the video clearly shows the people are wearing hard hats and are comming out of the safety zone for building 7.

END OF STORY.

STORY is correct.

You are assuming they are with a demo team. (the same demo team you said earlier didnt enter WTC7). Not like there could possibly be any other construction work being done in the area...and these brave individuals were coming over to help (like so many volunteers were doing).

So, are you saying these hard hat workers were from a demo team or not? Yes or No?

Originally posted by gavron
You are assuming they are with a demo team. (the same demo team you said earlier didnt enter WTC7).

I am not assuming anything. I stated the demo teams did not have to go into the buidling i never said they did or did not go into the building.

Not like there could possibly be any other construction work being done in the area...and these brave individuals were coming over to help (like so many volunteers were doing).

What are they doing in an area that was cleared of firemen and workers ?

So, are you saying these hard hat workers were from a demo team or not? Yes or No?

As stated we do not know who they are.

[edit on 1-5-2010 by REMISNE]

Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
You are assuming they are with a demo team. (the same demo team you said earlier didnt enter WTC7).

I am not assuming anything. I stated the demo teams did not have to go into the buidling i never said they did or did not go into the building.

Umm.. say again?

Your second sentence says "I stated the demo teams did not have to go int the buidling"

You next say "i never said the did or did not go into the building"

You are contradicting yourself, Roger.

Originally posted by gavron
You are contradicting yourself, Roger.

No, i am stating that the demo teams did not have to go into the building.

I never stated one way or another if they did nor not.

This is the last time i repeat this.

Originally posted by gavron
You are contradicting yourself, Roger.

No, i am stating that the demo teams did not have to go into the building.

I never stated one way or another if they did nor not.

This is the last time i repeat this.

Originally posted by REMISNE
No, i am stating that the demo teams did not have to go into the building.

I never stated one way or another if they did nor not.

So, you are telling us that a demo team can bring down WTC7 in a controlled fashion without entering the building at all?

Wow...

Originally posted by gavron
So, you are telling us that a demo team can bring down WTC7 in a controlled fashion without entering the building at all?

Well it would not take much to bring down an already unstable building.

Specially they way building 7 was constructed.

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well it would not take much to bring down an already unstable building.

Specially they way building 7 was constructed.

But not entering the building at all? That's amazing! I'd love to see how they can bring down a building without even entering it.

Demo companies all over the world could use that! My god, it would be the safest job in the world!