PROOF that Building 7 was demolished with explosives!!!

Originally posted by gavron
But not entering the building at all? That's amazing! I'd love to see how they can bring down a building without even entering it.

Why do you have to keep twisting things?

I never stated the demo teams did not go into the buildings. I stated they did not need to they could have told other how to do it.

Please do not twist or misquote me or i have to notify the mods.

Originally posted by REMISNE
I never stated the demo teams did not go into the buildings. I stated they did not need to they could have told other how to do it.

Hang on...

So these demo teams are telling people how to do demolitions work now?

hahaha!

"psst...hey buddy. c'mere. Can you go into that building there and place this thermite cutter on that beam there? I'd go in with you, but I'm expecting a call."

Seriously?? You honestly believe that demo crews were telling other people how to do demo work.



[edit]My co-workers are rolling on the floor with that gem


[edit on 1-5-2010 by gavron]

Originally posted by gavron
Seriously?? You honestly believe that demo crews were telling other people how to do demo work.

No just people who know how to cut beams and bring down a building.

People who would go into the building if the all the demo teams would not.

Originally posted by REMISNE
No just people who know how to cut beams and bring down a building.

People who would go into the building if the all the demo teams would not.

....but not the demo teams....since they were telling these people.

....and not the firemen, because you said they were already out of the area.

Who does that leave, Roger?

Originally posted by REMISNE

Well it would not take much to bring down an already unstable building.

Specially they way building 7 was constructed.

So then a little more time and fire would do it also, correct?

Keep in mind that time and fire are responsible for making it unstable in the first place.

Originally posted by gavron
Who does that leave, Roger?

Well there was more the one demo team.

Also there were fire resecue teams there.

Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Keep in mind that time and fire are responsible for making it unstable in the first place.

No actually it was the damage casued by the collapse of WTC 1 that made it unstable, not the fires.

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well there was more the one demo team.

Also there were fire resecue teams there.

So....just to be perfectly clear.... you are telling us a demo team told another demo team or fire rescue team to bring down the building?

Originally posted by REMISNE
No actually it was the damage casued by the collapse of WTC 1 that made it unstable, not the fires.

So, the fires that were out of control and threatening to jump to other buildings....that didnt do anything to the building?

So then a demo team sent ANOTHER demo team or fire rescue to rig the building to come down in a controlled fashion.

...I think I need another drink to follow this logic.

[edit on 1-5-2010 by gavron]

Originally posted by gavron
So, the fires that were out of control and threatening to jump to other buildings....that didnt do anything to the building?

No one said they were out of control.

So then a demo team sent ANOTHER demo team or fire rescue to rig the building to come down in a controlled fashion.

Well we do not know for sure, just that the fire commander gave the order, who did it and how it it was done we do not have the incident command log to show us.

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well we do not know for sure, just that the fire commander gave the order, who did it and how it it was done we do not have the incident command log to show us.

The fire commander gave the order to have the burning building demolished? Please show us a report where any fire commander has approved a still burning multi story building to be demolished.

You know who did it? You have witness statement from the demo crew? Please show us that report/interview.

You know how it was done? You have the exact method it was brought down? Please, tell us all. The whole 9/11 community would like you to show us this elusive information.

Originally posted by gavron
The fire commander gave the order to have the burning building demolished? Please show us a report where any fire commander has approved a still burning multi story building to be demolished.

The fire chief or fire marshall can bring down a building in a emergency.




[edit on 1-5-2010 by REMISNE]

Originally posted by REMISNE
The fire chief or fire marshall can bring down a building in a emergency.

ok, if that is so, please give us an example of a fire chief or marshall ordering a team to bring down a still burning multi story building.

Or....do you mean they can authorize a building be demolished AFTER the fires are out?

I'd love yo see just one example where you have a demolition team go into a still burning multi story structure and rig it to come down in a controlled fashion.

Originally posted by REMISNE

No actually it was the damage casued by the collapse of WTC 1 that made it unstable, not the fires.

The damage that NIST says played no part in the collapse?

Oh, then you have an engineering report that refutes NIST's statement, right?

Perhaps you should do more research before you make comments like this, cuz you've painted yourself into a corner with particular statement.

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well there was more the one demo team.

But you said the demo teams didnt enter the building:

Originally posted by REMISNE
Why do you have to keep twisting things?

I never stated the demo teams did not go into the buildings. I stated they did not need to they could have told other how to do it.

So, now you say fire rescue teams rigged the building to collapse in a controlled fashion.

interesting....

Originally posted by gavron
So, now you say fire rescue teams rigged the building to collapse in a controlled fashion.interesting....

No, i am saying they could have with help. As stated we do not know for sure who did and and how without incident log.

Originally posted by REMISNE
No, i am saying they could have with help. As stated we do not know for sure who did and and how without incident log.

That isnt what you said here:

Originally posted by REMISNE
Well we do not know for sure, just that the fire commander gave the order, who did it and how it it was done we do not have the incident command log to show us.

Your post is worded so that it says
You dont know for sure, just that
1 - the fire commander gave the order
2 - who did it
3 - how it was done

we do not have the incident command to show us.

Or did you just word your statement poorly?

Originally posted by gavron
Your post is worded so that it says
You dont know for sure, just that
1 - the fire commander gave the order
2 - who did it
3 - how it was done

You need to reread.

1. Yes the fire commander gave the order.

2 and 3. we do not know who and how it was done.

We do not have the incident command log.

[edit on 1-5-2010 by REMISNE]

[edit on 1-5-2010 by REMISNE]

Originally posted by REMISNE
You need to reread.

1. Yes the fire commander gave the order.

2 and 3. we do not know who and how it was done.

We do not have the incident command log.

ok, that's not how you worded what you said. No wonder everyone has a hard time debating you.

So, the fire chief gave the order. Which order is that? To clear the area? No problem with that. However, you have no proof that he ordered a demolition crew to bring down WTC7.

Heck, you cant even show that a demo crew has EVER brought down a still burning multi story building before OR after 9/11. Sounds like a fantasy to me.

reply to post by pteridine


You're making the claim you have to prove it. Tired of this crap.