It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Orion7911
Originally posted by hooper
Those are not "reports". They are quotes from newspaper articles. Nobody was filing a "report". Using that term lends an air of officially vetted information - there was no such thing.
So if no reports were ever filed about what happened to the plane at shanks, how do you know what happened there and what the "official" story is about what happened?
Or do you agree that there was never any official report or story about what happened to UA93?
And if so, why do you make any statements at all about what happened? Or is it that you're admitting in fact that you DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED?
C'mon hooper, you support the official narrative right? You claim a plane crashed into shanksville and believe it was UA93 right?
What evidence specifically do you base this BELIEF on? Which report/s and from whom, are you claiming supports what you believe to have happened?
Originally posted by rnaa
It says that all persons listed are subject to additional charges. OBL's page says he is wanted for additional charges.
These are wanted posters, not charge sheets.
Grow up for heavens sake.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by rnaa
It says that all persons listed are subject to additional charges. OBL's page says he is wanted for additional charges.
These are wanted posters, not charge sheets.
Grow up for heavens sake.
Speaking of growing up, why do you refuse to accept the fact that both the FBI and DOJ have stated that there is not enonugh evidence th charge OBL with 9/11?
Originally posted by hooper
Because that contention of yours is not a fact.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Because that contention of yours is not a fact.
Sorry but it is fact. I am so sorry if the facts get in the way of your theories / fantasies.
Originally posted by hooper
I am therefore going to demand a statement and source dated no earlier than yesterday that it is the current official postition of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justices that there is insufficient evidence to pursue or charge Osama Bin Laden with criminal conspiracy relative to the terrorist events of 9/11.
Originally posted by hooper
I'll just take that as there are no "facts or evidence" to support your contention that the FBI and DOJ are currently not pursuing OBL as related to the events of 9/11 due to insufficient evidence.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
I'll just take that as there are no "facts or evidence" to support your contention that the FBI and DOJ are currently not pursuing OBL as related to the events of 9/11 due to insufficient evidence.
Thanks for showing you are afriad to look for facts becasue you might be proven wrong as to what you think happened.
Originally posted by hooper
[Love to see these "facts and evidence" that support your contention that the FBI and the DOJ are not currently interested in OBL in connection with 9/11.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
[Love to see these "facts and evidence" that support your contention that the FBI and the DOJ are not currently interested in OBL in connection with 9/11.
Just like i would love to see those facts and evidence of flight 93 parts stored.
Originally posted by hooper
Nice dodge. So where is the evidence that the DOJ and the FBI are currently not interested in OBL regarding 9/11.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Nice dodge. So where is the evidence that the DOJ and the FBI are currently not interested in OBL regarding 9/11.
Are you going to accept and admit to it when shown or dismiss it as usual?
Originally posted by hooper
Now, before you go sending something that is going to embarass you, do you want to maybe restate and clarify your position as regards your understanding of the subject issue?