Mag 8.6 earthquake in China?--2010-27-01

Originally posted by l neXus l
can someone explain why NO geological website knows of this, NO news knows of this, NO china news has reported it NOTHING, its TOO FISHY

If there is a large disaster taking place, these people have better things to do than to type online, "We're being crushed."

Originally posted by ImplausibleDeniability

Originally posted by Aggie Man

Originally posted by anotherdad
Maybe someone on a hike accidentally kicked the equipment.

It says it was off the coast, so maybe some scuba diver hit it with their flipper

Wha? Sichuan province borders Tibet. It's nowhere near a coastline.

27Jan2010 18:51:48.5 0.3N 0.5E 71 mb=8.6 6 ROM OFF S. COAST OF NORTHWEST 1905

That's just what is says...OFF S. COAST...

I am finding it hard to lend any credibility to this so far, there would be atleast SOMETHING otu there about it.

Even the sourced sites here so far have yet to list it on their world maps.

reply to post by pigwithoutawig


Did anybody check what the HAARP activity was at the time?

I don't know where to look but you guys must know something?

reply to post by Romans 10:9

Originally posted by Romans 10:9

Originally posted by argentus
USGS is usually very prompt with their auto-email re: global earthquakes. I don't see anything yet, but will report details if it shows up. If not up within the next hour or two, I'd be inclined to doubt it.

BTW, I've not personally witnessed any data that indicates USGS fiddling with either the measurement parameters, nor the epicenter. Often the intial magnitude report is refined shortly thereafter, when it has been compared with other global seismographs.

How do you suscribe to the auto-email? I'd like to get in on that.

It's been so long that I subscribed, that it took me a while to figure out exactly where in the system I did so. Go to THIS page, and follow the subscription instructions. One word of caution: I have my parameters set to "global" as far as area of the epicenter, but I'm only notified of 'quakes 5.5 and above. I suspect that if you were to indicate ALL earthquakes of ALL magnitude, you'd spend the rest of your days deleting the emails.

Each email comes with a link to the USGS and other seismic agency maps and notification, as well as a link to tsunami alerts/warnings where applicable. The format looks like this:

== PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE REPORT ==

***This event supersedes event AT00461817.


Region: PHILIPPINE ISLANDS REGION
Geographic coordinates: 13.684N, 125.439E
Magnitude: 6.1 Mw
Depth: 24 km
Universal Time (UTC): 27 Jan 2010 18:49:33
Time near the Epicenter: 28 Jan 2010 02:49:33
Local standard time in your area: 27 Jan 2010 18:49:33

Location with respect to nearby cities:
141 km (88 miles) ESE (106 degrees) of Pandan, Catanduanes, Philippines
192 km (119 miles) ENE (72 degrees) of Legaspi, Luzon, Philippines
200 km (124 miles) NNE (26 degrees) of Calbayog, Samar, Philippines
493 km (306 miles) ESE (102 degrees) of MANILA, Philippines


ADDITIONAL EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS
________________________________
event ID : US 2010rzbv

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist at NEIC
For subsequent updates, maps, and technical information, see:
earthquake.usgs.gov...
or
earthquake.usgs.gov...

National Earthquake Information Center
U.S. Geological Survey
neic.usgs.gov...


DISCLAIMER: sslearthquake.usgs.gov...

This email was sent to XXXXXXXXXXX

You requested mail for events between -90.0/90.0 latitude and
180.0/-180.0 longitude
for M5.5 at all times.


To change your parameters or unsubscribe, go to:
sslearthquake.usgs.gov...

[edit on 27/1/10 by argentus]

reply to post by kyle43


Your "link" is wrong.

Go to the true seismic activity site:
Current Seismic Events List

jw

reply to post by l neXus l


Nice find, but did anyone bother to navigate back to the main page listing all the quakes? There's no listing for an 8.6 quake and nothing for the time stamp on the link you provided.

Something's not adding up here, and as another poster pointed out, if there really was an event that large, it would have registered on every earthquake monitoring system in the world.

The pervading idea in this thread that China could with hold something of this magnitude is beyond delusional.

Nothing showing up on the USGS site I frequent. But there was just one that occurred in Central Alaska with a ? magnitude. I've never seen them denote magnitude with a ? before.

earthquake.usgs.gov...

[edit on 27-1-2010 by Aggie Man]

That link above has removed the ? Alaska Quake. BUT, it's still listed here:

earthquake.usgs.gov...

[edit on 27-1-2010 by Aggie Man]

Hey, if true, it coincides with all I've been reading about Earth ascending.

Spiritually speaking, of course.

The sunken land masses of the ancient past are scheduled to be rising in the oceans... Atlantis and Lemuria.

the moniters are working fine

a 4.8 just hit java and my browser shook

reply to post by argentus


Thanks, but Firefox is saying not to allow the site.....keeps giving me warnings.

I find it oddly striking that paying attention to these little disturbances is very VERY oddly similar to watching the uterus monitor during weak labor.

reply to post by l neXus l


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My belly is shaking now and bladder & bowels causing mudlides and flooding.
Thanks for the laugh!

"Labor pains" bro

reply to post by Atlantican


which post are you replying to?

couldn't someone just call someone in china and ask them instead of scouring the internet and "confirming" it on foreign websites?

Now I don't think it happend but its just weird that a few different stations picked up on the earthquake independently. I don't know what could have caused this to happend.

reply to post by Yetichi


I don't speak Chinese, and I don't have long distance...are you offering?

Following the link in the OP, at the top you will see a link that says Magnitude>6

www.seismo.ethz.ch...

It shows NO quake in China.

somebody on another conspiracy site just quoted this usgs link:

aslwww.cr.usgs.gov...