It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
"The identities of the airplanes hijacked in the September 11 attacks was never in question"
Yes, we can put this one to bed now.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Ok, there we can just put that to bed now. The thread has been around long enough for anyone to prove that it was identified and the best that has been attempted is to argue it did not need to be done.
Originally posted by 911files
They have invoked law enforcement priviledge in regards to the recovered parts lists (serial numbers, etc), so they do exist.
By the way, you sent 2 U2U's. I am just letting you know that they are not desired so that there are no misunderstandings.
The problem with people like you is that you lock into a single quote like this as evidence of something and spend fruitless hours arguing it, although if you spent the time doing a little research, you would learn what really happened. But then again, you don't want to learn, you want to believe. Good luck with that.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by iSunTzu
On September 11, 2001 when the passengers of Flight 77 were murdered. All the news agencies got it right. If you have evidence to the contrary you can sue them for telling lies.
It has been 8 years did you miss the news on September 11th 2001?
No one has evidence to the contrary yet. Good luck
Huh? I do not think you understand the actual question being asked here. Perhaps you do not understand what happens when a plane crashes. The parts are matched by SN. When did this happen on 9/11/01?
Originally posted by jthomas
I already nailed you on this, Lillydale. Why do you refuse to accept the fact that a) you have no ability to know whether or not parts were identified or not, b) serial numbers are used to identify parts in accident investigations, and, c) all of the other evidence proves conclusively that AA77 hit the Pentagon. You already know this.
Now is the time for you to admit that you are illogical claims have been completely dismissed as ridiculous.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Proper ID of the 9/11 aircraft must be done for the following .
1. Proper ID of aircraft for criminal investigation.
2. Proper ID of aircraft for airlines to collect insurance.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by jthomas
I already nailed you on this, Lillydale. Why do you refuse to accept the fact that a) you have no ability to know whether or not parts were identified or not, b) serial numbers are used to identify parts in accident investigations, and, c) all of the other evidence proves conclusively that AA77 hit the Pentagon. You already know this.
Now is the time for you to admit that you are illogical claims have been completely dismissed as ridiculous.
Proper ID of the 9/11 aircraft must be done for the following .
1. Proper ID of aircraft for criminal investigation.
2. Proper ID of aircraft for airlines to collect insurance.
Originally posted by jthomas
Utter nonsense.
You do not need individual serial numbers to identify a known aircraft. ALL of the evidence already demonstrates that AA77, a Boeing 757, hit the Pentagon.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by jthomas
Utter nonsense.
You do not need individual serial numbers to identify a known aircraft. ALL of the evidence already demonstrates that AA77, a Boeing 757, hit the Pentagon.
You are right, utter nonsense since 9/11 is a criminal investigation so the aircraft do need to be identified.
Also the aircraft need to be identified for the airlines to collect insurance.
Please show me all this evidence you have that shows AA77 hit the Pentagon.
Please show me any of the following.
1. Photos w/sources of A77 hitting the Pentagon.
2. Video w/sources of AA77 hitting the Pentagon.
3. Photos w/sources of all parts found matching AA77.
Originally posted by hooper
the insurance companies are satisfied, our investigative agencies are wholly satisfied that the plane involved in AA77 hit the Pentagon on 9/11/2001.
Originally posted by 911files
Well spoken for an NSA security guard. 1) and 2) don't exist in the public domain. 3) has already been posted for one part. Many other photos have been passed around the internet and you darn well know it.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Thanks for admitting you cannot show photos or vidoes of AA77 hitting the Pentagon.
Please show me the photos of ALL the parts found at the Pentagon with proper sources.
Originally posted by 911files
Already been done in this thread and all over the internet. I'm not going to do your investigoogling for you.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by 911files
Already been done in this thread and all over the internet. I'm not going to do your investigoogling for you.
As i thought you cannot show photos of all the parts found at the Pentagon with proper sources or where they are now.
[edit on 29-12-2009 by REMISNE]
Originally posted by 911files
Don't make assertions not in the mix. I never said ALL and you did not ask for ALL. I said one posted in this thread and you are too lazy to go find it. There are more that have been on the internet for years, firmly id'd as 757 parts, but not specific to AAL77.
you nor anyone else in this thread has offered any evidence beyond wild speculation and 'belief'. You sir, have wasted enough of my time.
Photos w/sources of all parts found matching AA77
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by 911files
Don't make assertions not in the mix. I never said ALL and you did not ask for ALL. I said one posted in this thread and you are too lazy to go find it. There are more that have been on the internet for years, firmly id'd as 757 parts, but not specific to AAL77.
First off i did ask for photos of All parts.
So thanks for admitting the part might not be from AA77.
you nor anyone else in this thread has offered any evidence beyond wild speculation and 'belief'. You sir, have wasted enough of my time.
All i have to do is prove reasonable doubt that the offici al story is wrong, which i have proven many times.
[edit on 29-12-2009 by REMISNE]
Originally posted by Alfie1
In order to establish a reasonable doubt, in relation to plane parts at the Pentagon, do you not have to demonstrate that there was at least one part recovered incompatible with a Boeing 757.
Can you do that please ?