It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by REMISNE
So you do not need evidence like photos you just go by what you have been told happened? You make a good media robot.
Originally posted by 911files
I have 100+ eyewitnesses (including the NoC witnesses) that say they plane flew into the Pentagon (some who actually saw the plane enter the building).
I've got additional statements from the military personnel that recovered plane and body parts, and DNA identification of passengers of flight 77 found inside the Pentagon.
Originally posted by jthomas
The laughs on you, Lillydale. ALL of the evidence already demonstrated that it was AA77 that hit the Pentagon. None of us need photographs to know that it was AA77 - including you.
Like I said, one can never underestimate the intelligence of you 9/11 "Truthers."
Your apology to the families of the victims of AA77's crash into the Pentagon and the thousands of people who worked at the Pentagon in the aftermath of 9/11 is past due, Lillydale.
How were bodies found inside the buidling when the passengers were taken to the back of the plane and we know the back of the plane did not make it into the building?
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
They were found throughout the path of
Flight 77 as it traveled through the building.
Originally posted by jthomas
The facts and evidence are not in dispute.
It was identified as AA77, a Boeing 757, immediately. That you slipped up and admitted an aircraft hit the Pentagon leaves you in the hopeless position of refuting the evidence that it was AA77.
It seems a real pilot would have known that. Hmmmm.....
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Now, if you (or Ultima1) had mentioned something about the "FARs" in your posts,
§ 25.1301 Function and installation.
(a) Each item of installed equipment must—
(1) Be of a kind and design appropriate to its intended function;
(2) Be labeled as to its identification, function, or operating limitations, or any applicable combination of these factors;
(3) Be installed according to limitations specified for that equipment; and
(4) Function properly when installed.
(b) EWIS must meet the requirements of subpart H of this part.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
YOU wish to claim the fantastic, per your OP...bring it on, bring the specific evidence.
Originally posted by Lillydale
WHAT PART OF THE WING IS IT?
WHERE WAS IT IDENTIFIED AS BELONGING TO AA77?
Since I am asking a THIRD TIME to BACK UP YOUR OWN PICTURE, you must be LYING. Instead of backing it up, you no longer need it? You are so full of crap. Thanks for the Appolonia though, this will do since it is pretty clear that you are full of it.
JT:Second, please tell us what the debris is in the background where all the men are standing.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/010469869cb8.jpg[/atsimg]
Liliydale: Hmmmm...well I could guess plane debris. I could guess wing debris. I could even guess it is a sea of dead seagulls. I can guess all day long but unfortunately, that is all you can do too.
JT: Exactly. Now you are catching on. You can look at that photo of debris all day long and you agree that you are unable to tell us of what that debris is composed.
Lilydale: Not one thing in that picture indicates that it is debris from "shattered" wings.
JT: Since you agree you cannot tell us of what the debris in the background is composed, then you would agree that you cannot tell us that the debris does not contain wing debris. You can only say, "I don't know."
That was easy, wasn't it. All you have to do is learn to be skeptic and you can learn to ask the right questions and answer them yourselves.
But as I told you long ago, you have thousands of people who can tell you. You can ask them yourself what the debris was they walked through, picked up, recovered, and removed, but you repeatedly refuse to ask them.
In the meantime, we have absolutely no reason NOT to accept ALL of the evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon. Neither do you.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
otherwise, the handwaving and bluster isn't quite cutting it.
Originally posted by jthomas
Please do the decent thing and apologize to the families of the victims of AA77's crash into the Pentagon.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by jthomas
The facts and evidence are not in dispute.
You have no actual evidence, and the official FBI criminal reports have not been released yet.
It was identified as AA77, a Boeing 757, immediately. That you slipped up and admitted an aircraft hit the Pentagon leaves you in the hopeless position of refuting the evidence that it was AA77.
Originally posted by jthomas
Yes, we know that AA77 hit the Pentagon. ALL of the evidence from multiple sources told us that immediately.
As you well know, U1, ee do not need any FBI criminal report, serial numbers, or videos, to know that AA77 crashed into the Pentagon. .