It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Choronzon
reply to post by pepsi78
Sure why not Mr. Albert Pike himself:
"I set out to learn for myself, and what I learned may upset many Christians, who have to be told that the King James version of the Bible, which they revere as the literal, precise, correct work of God, is not always so. Some of the error in it was quite deliberate, including the biblical designation of Lucifer as Satan, along with the concordant story of a fallen angel. It is difficult to anticipate the reactions of some believers on being told that there are gross mistakes in the King James version, but, please, do not throw this book across the room in disgust until you have read a bit more."
If you would like to read more, please do:
www.masonicinfo.com
Since you like false information, you may like this false quote from Albert Pike on lucifer:
Taxils Hoax
[edit on 12/6/2009 by Choronzon]
Originally posted by prevenge
Masonry is based deeply in Kabbala and Gnosticism, so you have the Gnostic understanding of 'The Lucifer'.. 'light bringing' process of the esoteric anatomy, ...THEN you have fanatic Christians using base-minded primitive cave-man-like thinking in superstitiously thinking that Gnostics / Masons worship some 'person' called Lucifer, because the Christians fear punishment from their patriarchal idea of God if they 'stray' into understanding esoteric or occult explanations of the divinity within man... by in any way straying from the surface-interpretation-level writings in the Bible, written by other men..
[edit on 6-12-2009 by prevenge]
Satan does not exist! "King" Albert Pike says so...........
Originally posted by RuneSpider
Satan does not exist! "King" Albert Pike says so...........
That statement is not contained within the link.
He instead is arguing for the distinction between the name "Lucifer" and Satan, and the inaccuracies in the translations in the King Jame's Version of the Bible.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
I also disagree with your interpretation of the quote Choronzon posted.
Well that doesn't really suprise me. "The greatest trick the devil played was convincing people he doesn't exist" I don't remeber who first said it but its certainly an interesting quote.
What better way of manipulating the ignorant masses(and a lot of low level masons) from behind the scenes then to deny satan's existance?
I could go on and tell you that lucifer/satan is leader of the draconian elite from alpha draconis, better known as reptillians, and has waged war with many other alien species, but NO DOUBT it would fall on deaf ears since you already know everything.
What you read, what you believe and what you do with the knowledge you gain is entirely up to each person's discretion.
Now run along and pick on someone less knowledgeable, preferrably on some kool-aid mainstream site. Most "old-time" ATSers will destroy your non-existant theories. We are too smart for you!
Originally posted by RuneSpider
You must not be referring to yourself, as I was a member of this site before you.
I am not picking on you, I am however disagreeing with you.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
You WISH true meanings are/were lost in time...
The English Standard Version uses archaic constructions to produce a text that sounds more literal than it really is. For example, Hosea 9:1 in the English Standard Version reads, “Rejoice not, O Israel” where the equally conservative Holman Christian Standard Bible reads, “Israel, do not rejoice.” The translations are equally literal. Perhaps I should say, “Write not archaic language, O translators!” So this translation only makes it halfway into modern English. Genesis 12:1 reads, “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house,” which seems more literal that the same passage in the New International Version, which says, “Leave your country, your people and your father’s household”; however in this case, the NIV is actually more literal, because no one seems to have “kindred” these days, and in modern usage, “leaving your father’s house” implies that you are living in your father’s spare bedroom or basement, which is not what the ancient text means. Most Bible translations cannot resist finding their viewpoints on contemporary social issues in the ancient text. The ESV is not an exception. It is just as circumspect of conservative sensitivities as the New Revised Standard Version is of feminist concerns. In other words, I find as much to dislike in the ESV as in the NRSV, but for opposite reasons.
Low iq or denial syndrome...
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Conclusion: We masons adore "god" which in reality is satan but we are not mature enough to admit EVEN WHEN PROVEN WRONG, so we must ENDLESSLY make up excuses to cover it up.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
You WISH true meanings are/were lost in time...
Dr. William Combs, a Seminary Academy Dean and noted Bible historian, details how the Bible has been both inadvertently and intentionally mistranslated in his peer reviewed essay Errors in the King James Version?.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Low iq or denial syndrome...
I see you are resorting to personal insults again instead of presenting refuting evidence.
[edit on 7-12-2009 by AugustusMasonicus]
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I rarely start an ATS session thinking "Hey I wanna insult someone." It's a last resort "solution" towards overly closed-minded people that have nothing valuable to share.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Oh its "peer reviewed"....that means it MUST BE credible! Hahaaa
Honestly, I could not care less what Dr. William Combs believes as the bible speaks for itself! Yes there might be a few mistakes here and there but what your implying is total nonsense.
I rarely start an ATS session thinking "Hey I wanna insult someone." It's a last resort "solution" towards overly closed-minded people that have nothing valuable to share.