It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DaddyBare
I just don't see them getting far over land.
Originally posted by scobro
If these ancient cave paintings are simply depictions of normal people,why dont they have the faces and bodies of normal people?
If so,then why the difficulty in drawing an accurate representation of the human face?
Originally posted by pieman
the vikings probably wouldn't have traveled overland, although they were pretty adept at surviving and thriving in rugged landscapes and not shy of a fight with a hostile tribe or two.
if they did travel, i'm fairly sure they'ld have used waterways. are there any rivers in the area that drain to the east coast?
Originally posted by scobro
That is pure speculation on your part!
The fact remains,that no matter how "abstract" these drawings are,all over the world you will barely see an authentic representation of the human face!
Originally posted by scobro
That is pure speculation on your part!
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
"Pure speculation" is claims the rock art represents aliens or Norsemen.
Originally posted by scobro
That is pure speculation on your part!
The fact remains,that no matter how "abstract" these drawings are,all over the world you will barely see an authentic representation of the human face!
Originally posted by DaddyBare
You just have to live here to understand how unlikely a trip like that would be, how unlikely Vikings would ever meet the Anasazi
Originally posted by Ridhya
But it also corroborates with the Spanish saying they say tall white people on the shore.
Originally posted by pieman
Originally posted by Ridhya
But it also corroborates with the Spanish saying they say tall white people on the shore.
i've only heard of giants down in patagonia, the southernmost tip of south america. were there giants reported in the nothern part of america?