It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seeashrink
Here is the problem as I see it; yes, we can refuse to obey all orders that contradict the Constitution, but then what? When, notice I didn't say "if", the time comes there has to be a point that we go from refusing to obey orders to actually DEFENDING the Constitution. I hope and pray that I have enough wisdom to descern when its that time.
Seeashrink
Originally posted by seeashrink
reply to post by treemanx
I cannot say if the pictures are staged or what, but there are some pictures online of some of the troops in Afghanistan wearing an Oath Keeper's tab on the shoulder of their uniforms....interesting.
Seeashrink
Originally posted by Sestias
I would need to know how the Oath Keepers interpret the Constitution. Bear in mind that scholars of Constitutional Law don't always agree.
I suspect that most of the present members of that group consider Social Security and Medicare to be unconstitutional, because these are federal programs and not state ones. So how would one keep their oath in this case? Round up all the senior citizens who get federal benefits and lock them up? Or just take away their Social Security checks and refuse them medical care if they don't pay through the nose for it? Or shoot them or lock them up if they protest?
A lot of people who really just have an extreme agenda hide behind the claim that they are just defending the Constitution.
Originally posted by Sestias
I would need to know how the Oath Keepers interpret the Constitution. Bear in mind that scholars of Constitutional Law don't always agree.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by whaaa
That's one of the biggest problems IMO.
An element that is ingrained into every part of society and government but is intent on working against the populace is hard to identify as it sounds like pretty much the average public servant.
Originally posted by conspiracyrus
I would assume they are literalists when it comes to the constitution ... no interpretation what it says is how it goes.
[edit on 19-10-2009 by conspiracyrus]
: according with the letter of the scriptures b : adhering to fact or to the ordinary construction or primary meaning of a term or expression
Originally posted by ItIsWhatItIs
If you want to fight against an idea, you better start now. There are all types of tools at your disposal. Voting comes to mind. Getting publicity to the leaders you want in office. Ever tried that? Or is that not violent enough of a revolution?
Originally posted by IntelRetard
reply to post by Pilot
Maybe the rest of the world will come to save us as we did Europe and others in WWII!
record player in the background scratches to a halt, forums get dead quiet...
laughter brakes out all around:
Launched in March by Las Vegan Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers bills itself as a nonpartisan group of current and retired law enforcement and military personnel who vow to fulfill their oaths to the Constitution.
More specifically, the group's members, which number in the thousands, pledge to disobey orders they deem unlawful, including directives to disarm the American people and to blockade American cities.