It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JJRichey
A bunch of senior or amateur astronomers are not able to view the far side of the moon, so there fore you can not make a direct assumption that there is no bases on the other side of the moon unless you own a probe and have the money to send it in an orbit behind the moon for your own viewing pleasures.
Originally posted by krystalice
I agree with the poster, regardless of how exaggerated the true intention really becomes, I believe we have a democratic association to the events on the moon.
Originally posted by krystalice
An explosion whether be 100 meters in diameter more or less needs to be approved democratically by the citizens and not by some privately owned organisation like NASA and any other organisation in association for that mater.
Originally posted by krystalice
This is crime.
Originally posted by krystalice
looking at this photo of the back side of the moon.... Well, All I see is craters. I just am not seeing any bases of any kind, do you?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4e53ca3cf16a.jpg[/atsimg]
Somehow, I missed the article. Sounds nice on paper... but in actuality....? I'll bet $1 NASA puts on a huuuge show, and the 'data' will be pored over for 'a long time'. Meanwhile, behind closed doors, a bunch of scientists are gonna be banging their heads on desks trying to figure out the gobbledegook that got sent back, because the rocket stage didn't do everything they thought it would... Nothing goes perfectly as planned, with NASA, half as much.