It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by clarktkhoury
are you all serious ?
the masons arnt a relgion, there a brotherhood !
inorder to join, one mus beleive in a higher power (god)..
im not saying jesus id the son of god, just that masons DONT JUDGE OTHER RELIGIONS! THEY DONT CARE ! THERE A BROTHERHOOD snip!
So, if you believe Satan is god, the Masons say, come on in.
Originally posted by oconnection
How did this discussion fall so low to insult a persons faith. Everyone has there own beliefs.
We've gone over this a dozen times already. Show me one Satanist who believes Satan created the Universe. A Mason must believe in God The Creator. (You know, the whole reason we refer to him as the Grand Architect of the Universe, because he built the whole thing???) Nowhere in any teaching or reading I've come across has ANY religion been founded on the belief of Satan the Creator.
Originally posted by kingswillquiver
So, if you believe Satan is god, the Masons say, come on in.
The truth was, these people were making money using God as a means, instead of earning, using favoritism and deception.
Nothing has changed, it has just gotten worse as the Freemason main job is to protect the bankers and their interests.
He was simply speaking about his own personal faith and not in any way speaking about Freemasonry as a whole. This is slander to the 10th degree.
Why don't you read a little, do a little home work before you say such completely ignorant remarks? I guess that's asking too much?
Interesting. I'll have to give that further investigation. But even then, by extension, one could argue that the higher God created the subordinate, right? There would still be "one above all others" as it were? (Not often you come across a system of separate beings with equal omnipotence...) I'd be careful on the whole "Satan and/or Lucifer" bit, though. A learned scholar such as yourself would recognize the translation errors that suppose any equivalency.
Originally posted by articulus
reply to post by JoshNorton
Not to fly completely off-topic, but there are some faiths and viewpoints that arguably do claim such. Certain gnostic texts have put forth the notion of the world's creation by a flawed demiurge, subordinate to the true God; the same demiurge is referred to in Christianity and Islam as Satan and/or Lucifer.
Originally posted by articulus
Not to fly completely off-topic, but there are some faiths and viewpoints that arguably do claim such. Certain gnostic texts have put forth the notion of the world's creation by a flawed demiurge, subordinate to the true God; the same demiurge is referred to in Christianity and Islam as Satan and/or Lucifer.
Originally posted by Splitta
Masonry was borne of the Templars being forced underground by Pope Clement V.
The Templars, who were an order of MONKS, NOT KNIGHTS
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Interesting. I'll have to give that further investigation. But even then, by extension, one could argue that the higher God created the subordinate, right? There would still be "one above all others" as it were? (Not often you come across a system of separate beings with equal omnipotence...) I'd be careful on the whole "Satan and/or Lucifer" bit, though. A learned scholar such as yourself would recognize the translation errors that suppose any equivalency.
Originally posted by articulus
reply to post by JoshNorton
Not to fly completely off-topic, but there are some faiths and viewpoints that arguably do claim such. Certain gnostic texts have put forth the notion of the world's creation by a flawed demiurge, subordinate to the true God; the same demiurge is referred to in Christianity and Islam as Satan and/or Lucifer.
[edit on 9/28/2009 by JoshNorton]