It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Does just over 47 hours of reading and researching the bills qualify as research?
Why are you trying to remove blame from Obama?
It really doesn't matter one way or the other now anyway.
He is literally spent fuel at this point, the left have rode him about as far as they can.
Congress is making the legislation, the president is pushing it... Is that to simple to understand?
They are all guilty of attempting to do this, but few have been so vocal in pushing this as President Obama has.
Ultimately he is a puppet, he knows his place in the real chain of command, and when the congress turns on him you will know a new blame game... Because even they will blame him to save their own political lives.
Watch the rats jump ship just before the 2010 elections.
You can blame who you want, it really makes no difference at this point.
Originally posted by whatukno
Because unlike most on this board, I don't bother to place blame on a figurehead that hasn't done anything except propose policy.
Perhaps in 2010 people will realize that fear isn't a political talking point and stop voting for candidates that use irrational fear to try and win elections.
Originally posted by whatukno
............
Because unlike most on this board, I don't bother to place blame on a figurehead that hasn't done anything except propose policy.
.............
And why is it that Obama is somehow lying when it is Congress that is drafting all of the legislation? Did I read the constitution wrong and now the President has to draft all legislation going through both chambers?
Even Obama himself has stated on interviews that elder Americans will not be covered for treatments, and or operations because "it might be better if they stay on prescription drugs since they are going to die anyway and the treatments or operations might not work"....
But the bills are accessible and people are free to go online and read the full text of each and every bill. Whether they do or not isn't anyone's problem but the person that shuts their eyes tight and then complains that they are passing these bills without people being able to read them first.
But go ahead, blame Obama for right wing pundits not bothering to go online and read the bill themselves, instead they just claim that the text is hidden and that no one knows anything about it.
Can't blame Obama for people not bothering to look for themselves.
Instead of believing that a hand written note was the doomsday scenario that was portrayed in the OP I decided to go look for myself. What did I find? That it's a penalty for tax evasion, not health care reform.
They want to tell everyone that this plan will jail them
and kill their grandmothers.
They want to tell you that this plan will raise your taxes to the point that you will be an indentured servant to the government.
Anyone who actually is awake and bothers to read and think for themselves can see through this and see that there is really no concrete plan on the table and that specifics are all in committee.
7/31/2009 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 31 - 28.
WRONG! HR3200 was reported out of the House last summer. We've seen it and dissected it right here.
Now, if you'd "read and think" for yourself, you'd avoid the embarassment of pointless posts.
No one here wants to spoonfeed you. If you want to "research" the truth, you will find it.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by jdub297
The last major action on HR 3200 is
7/31/2009 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 31 - 28.
So how is that there is no time to review it?
It's just funny when I read something like in the OP where it's claimed that this bill if enacted will jail people that aren't able to get insurance.
So, after reading the bill and the amendments myself and not finding the proposed jail sentence penalty I question. But instead of facts, I get a bunch of hyperbole.
The legislation has been up for a while now, (longer than 5 days, longer than 30 days.)
I linked to it on the previous page.
There is no point in debating someone who has their mind made up that one man is the absolute core of all that is evil and wrong with the world.
There is no point in debating someone who has their mind made up that one man is the absolute core of all that is evil and wrong with the world.
No one here believes that you are "the the absolute core of all that is evil and wrong with the world. "
But your messiah is.
jw
But the bills are accessible and people are free to go online and read the full text of each and every bill. Whether they do or not isn't anyone's problem but the person that shuts their eyes tight and then complains that they are passing these bills without people being able to read them first.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
Instead of going to some third party source for information and taking them at their word. I would suggest that you go to the library of congress and read the proposed legislation yourselves.
The op is talking about a hand written note, a note that in and of itself talks about tax evasion laws. Why people are taking a note about a tax evasion law and putting it as part of the Obama Health Care Plan is beyond me
................
Originally posted by whatukno
...........
It's kind of unfair to bitch about a bill if it hasn't been drafted yet. If the library of Congress does not have a copy of the bill, it means it does not exist. Otherwise it would state the fact that the wording of this particular bill has not been drafted yet.
Originally posted by whatukno
I think much of this debate has more to do with the sentiments brought up in this thread than it being a bad bill.
Originally posted by whatukno
I think the (to quote Bill Clinton) "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" doesn't want to loose money in the insurance game and so is using fear and ignorance to make everyone believe that health care reform is a bad idea.
Big Pharma is paying millions to kill this legislation
Insurance Companies are paying millions to kill this legislation
Originally posted by whatukno
People like me can't get quality health care. Why? I can't afford it. I can't afford to get sick. I can't afford to get routine checkups. I can't afford to fill a prescription if I do get sick.
There are millions like me.
Originally posted by whatukno
I work, I pay taxes, and I don't get squat. Someone comes along and wants to cut people like me a break, and the right doesn't go for it?
Originally posted by whatukno
Of course the right won't use the truth about why they have launched this campaign of fear and ignorance. They instead are using the tried and true method of disinformation and deflection to ensure that this doesn't pass.
Originally posted by whatukno
It's kind of unfair to bitch about a bill if it hasn't been drafted yet. If the library of Congress does not have a copy of the bill, it means it does not exist. Otherwise it would state the fact that the wording of this particular bill has not been drafted yet.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Oh, I see.... So you want people only to start protesting AFTER such legislation is passed, and made into law and not before?....
If we wait for it to pass it would be TOO LATE.... But hey, it is obvious that for some reason you don't seem to understand this.
Health care may be reduced by the sheer availability of doctors. Supply and demand. Are we causing our own problem? If Congress can't manage the doctor population, do you think we need them managing the economy? That's why we created the Federal Reserve.
The US Congress has a long, tragic history of passing legislation that promotes the industrialization of our food supply, effectively implementing the wishes -- both stated and unstated -- of agribusiness, and it's about to do it again.
Using the pretext of food safety, those behind the Food Safety Enhancement Act seek to institute changes the American public would not condone if it understood what is at stake. The country is being duped into believing that the pseudo-scientific measures prescribed by the bill will prevent new outbreaks of food-borne illnesses when in reality FSEA will usher in a number of undesirable outcomes, none of which do a thing to improve food safety. On the contrary, these measures will permit large processors to become an essentially unregulated segment of the industry by privatizing the inspection process, and -- at the same time -- the new regulations will constitute a cost-prohibitive barrier for small players to remain in business, making them easy targets for indiscriminant enforcement and greater market consolidation.
These proposed measures seek to apply “HACCP” (pronounced ‘hassip') -- a food protection approach originally designed to assure the safety of processed foods -- to raw foods, a kind of mistake only a lawyer or lobbyist would see a reason to make. The food safety wrecking crew responsible for applying HACCP erroneously to “raw-in/raw-out” meat and poultry operations in the 90s is back and ready to apply it erroneously to the produce market, the next FDA target in its quest for expanded oversight authority and police powers.
America saw its agricultural system intentionally subjected to political policies that radically transformed it. What was once a decentralized system that provided a means to self sufficiency and independence for tens of millions of farmers was purposefully centralized into a capital-intensive fossil-fuel dependent system that restructured local economies, permitting their wealth to be extracted by what are now transnational cartels dedicated to the so-called free market and globalized trade at all costs.
This transformation was the result of organized plans developed by a group of highly powerful – though unelected – financial and industrial executives who wanted to drastically change agricultural practices in the US to better serve their collective corporate financial agenda. This group, called the Committee for Economic Development, was officially established in 1942 as a sister organization to the Council on Foreign Relations. CED has influenced US domestic policies in much the same way that the CFR has influenced the nation's foreign policies.
In a number of reports written over a few decades, CED recommended that farming “resources” – that is, farmers – be reduced. In its 1945 report “Agriculture in an Expanding Economy,” CED complained that “the excess of human resources engaged in agriculture is probably the most important single factor in the ‘farm problem'” and describes how agricultural production can be better organized to fit to business needs.[2] A report published in 1962 entitled “An Adaptive Program for Agriculture”[3] is even more blunt in its objectives, leading Time Magazine to remark that CED had a plan for fixing the identified problem: “The essential fact to be faced, argues CED, is that with present high levels farm productivity, more labor is involved in agriculture production that the market demands – in short, there are too may farmers. To solve that problem, CED offers a program with three main prongs.....
Over the weekend, thousands of Texans attended what is being called the “largest free clinic ever held in the United States” to get health care they otherwise could not afford. ABC-13, a local Houston station, reported that the event showed that there is an “epidemic” of people without proper health coverage in Texas:
It’s an epidemic here in Texas and Harris County — people without health insurance. On Saturday, the uninsured lined up to get their needs met.
More than 2,000 people came to Reliant Center to see doctors for free. Many of the people we talked to can’t afford health insurance, especially in the rough economy. Some say it shows the need for health care reform.
Numerous patients described their experience with the broken U.S. health care system to ABC-13:
“My foot was turned upside down,” said patient Lillian Beverly. Beverly has had trouble walking since she took a bad fall three months ago. “I really don’t have the money to keep going to doctors and doctors,” she said.
Kevin Braggs is worried about his diabetes. “I’ve been without insurance for six months,” said Braggs.
And Vicki Robinson wants to keep her son’s asthma under control, but she says it’s difficult. “My husband’s lost his job. We’ve gone through our savings,” said Robinson.
And nine-year-old Kempton knows it. “We can’t afford medicine,” he said.