It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnmhinds
I really have to wonder if most of these videos are made by people who are trying to make truthers look like idiots.
What other reason could the person who made the above video have for ignoring 2 plane crashes and damage to WTC7 caused by by a collapsing 110 floor 400m+ skyscraper.
Nobody has ever said that only the fire brought down any of the WTC towers.
The collapses were all caused by a very complex chain of events, and you can't just ignore 2 plane crashes and a 110 floor skyscraper collapsing as somehow insignificant events like the person who made the video has done.
[edit on 15-9-2009 by johnmhinds]
Originally posted by ugie1028
and showed other buildings suffering from larger fires then WTC7 went through, but still stayed in tact..
Originally posted by johnmhinds
Originally posted by ugie1028
and showed other buildings suffering from larger fires then WTC7 went through, but still stayed in tact..
And you're just doing the same thing as the video maker, why are you ignoring everything else that happened to WTC7 apart from the fire and indirectly implying that only the fire brought down the tower.
We all know it wasn't just the fire that brought down WTC 7, a massive scoop was taken out of the front face of the building by debris falling from one of the Twin Towers, that same debris from the twin towers that caused the damage was found underneath the debris of the collapsed WTC 7.
To willfully ignore important facts about an event is a very odd way to go about finding the truth about anything.
Originally posted by johnmhinds
Ok, so now you're also saying that if WTC 3-4-5-6 didn't fully collapse then no other building could have.
I'm not even going to bother arguing with the amount of failed logic there because it's already been discussed a billion times.
And I never said it was only the Twin Tower debris that caused the collapse, I said the was the combination of both the damage and the fire that brought it down.
For so many people to willfully ignore either event while making their theories about WTC7 is bizarre.
None of you are truly looking for the truth.
Originally posted by ugie1028
your supporting lies, and propaganda, a majority of the victims families want a new investigation, so do 6/10 of the commission report. stop stalking my threads and repeating the same hogwash day in and day out, you will lose this fight.
BTW can i ask you HOW much their paying you to post this BS?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by ugie1028
your supporting lies, and propaganda, a majority of the victims families want a new investigation, so do 6/10 of the commission report. stop stalking my threads and repeating the same hogwash day in and day out, you will lose this fight.
Oh, rubbish. They don't want a new investigation becuase they think there's some conspiracy to use aircraft crashes to cover up bombs planted in a heavily occupied building to frame Afghanistan in order to invade Iraq, or whatever goofball conspirary it is you're foisting onto people. They want a new investigation because they want to know just how badly the gov't [censored] up in preventing the attack and responding to the attack, and guess what- I'm one of them. If the gov't can't even hand out bottles of water to hurricane victims in New Orleans without slipping on banana peels, then I absolutely positively know there had to have been more gross negligence than the gov't admitted to. This is exactly how I do know your conspiracies are rubbish- it would have reqired such sheer perfection of coordination that no human organization has been able to accomplish in all of recorded history, let alone the gov't.
You conspiracy people do NOT represent us people who want the gov't to be more forthcoming about its failures, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop pretending that you do, thank you very much.
BTW can i ask you HOW much their paying you to post this BS?
So when I say the truther movement is rife with absurdly unrealistic paranoia, how does this statement of yours disprove it, exactly?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Here's 9/11 truth in 30 SECONDS-
a) a bunch of Islamic fanatics all screwed up after years of "I hate the US" rhetoris gets the idea to use hijacked aircraft in suicide attacks
b) Becuase the US is so smug and self rightious with "it can't happen here" and "we're the most technological advanced in the world" mindsets, all we're able to do is stumble into walls and slip on banana peels when the attack actually occurs, so the attack is successful.
c) Hordes of paranoid anti-establishment "alternatives" who see naturally think everything bad in the world just has to be the fault of the US, and who see secret plots behind everything from the JFK assassination to the moon landing, naturally believe the 9/11 attack is a secret plot as well. They will come up with a wide range of conspiracy claims from controlled demolitions to laser from outer space, as well as a wide range of culprits from Bush to Israel to even secret satan worshipping cults (and I'm NOT making the last one up, either).
There. I just saved you eight minutes and 30 seconds.
Originally posted by ugie1028
STOP trying to say that the victims families dont want a new investigation.
They don't want a new investigation becuase they think there's some conspiracy to use aircraft crashes to cover up bombs planted in a heavily occupied building to frame Afghanistan in order to invade Iraq, or whatever goofball conspirary it is you're foisting onto people.
it would have reqired such sheer perfection of coordination that no human organization has been able to accomplish in all of recorded history, let alone the gov't.
This is exactly how I do know your conspiracies are rubbish
You conspiracy people do NOT represent us people who want the gov't to be more forthcoming about its failures, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop pretending that you do, thank you very much.
So when I say the truther movement is rife with absurdly unrealistic paranoia, how does this statement of yours disprove it, exactly?