It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
Well why dont you hit the alert button and get some mod to make me go find another hobby.
Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
Nothing I have posted is any more worthless than anything you have posted.
Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
I agree there is NO evidence of aliens visiting Earth
Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
There is not one person on Earth that has evidence of aliens visiting earth.
Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
Why is it that nobody can film an ET craft without suddenly getting the DT's and shaking like their out of crack rocks, and why are they always blurry and like 1 minute long?
Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
The UFO crowd is basically like a religion. They just all believe based on faith and too much sci-fi watching. Sure, just like religion, they say that there is evidence.. this blur here or that blur there. Its just like somebody seeing Jesus in a cloud or Mary in a potato.
Originally posted by TheAftermath
Hovered over a mountain? Really? Flares? Your source? Wait, let me guess, the AF?
try researching the subject first before trolling here.
Mind explaining the physics of how flares would travel laterally across the entire metropolitan area while maintaining elevation?
or better yet, why the AF would drop flares over densely populated areas?
[edit on 16-8-2009 by TheAftermath]
I have a friend who was there and saw it all and THE PHONENIX LIGHTS WERE NOT FLARES. Whoever claims that is a LIAR.
Originally posted by aceace
The moon and stars don't count, but lets be honest. With the reports worldwide and with an incredibly large percentage of the population now carrying cell-phones with cameras. There has yet to be one single definitive UFO caught on video.
Originally posted by Mr Mask
This thread is nothing but an attempt at a close-minded opinion based on nothing more then the OP's collective understanding of "history channel" documentaries.
I wouldn't take his thoughts on anything too seriously.
Not that I am saying he is wrong in his conclusion. But if he is right, its surly by the random chance of picking a side based on what a TV told him.
Not research, experience, insight or consideration.
In fact...I see the thread as nothing more then a bashing attempt on people who trust in a phenomena that has been documented for years.
Its sad to see his limited understanding of that documentation comes from his TV.