It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.historycommons.org...
[edit note: link too long - go to above opening page then to page 8]
In 2001, bin Laden apparently pressures Khalid Shaikh Mohammed for an attack date earlier than 9/11. According to information obtained from the 9/11 Commission (apparently based on a prison interrogation of Mohammed), bin Laden first requests an attack date of May 12, 2001, the seven-month anniversary of the USS Cole bombing.
Then, when bin Laden learns from the media that Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon would be visiting the White House in June or July 2001, he attempts once more to accelerate the operation to coincide with his visit. [9/11 Commission, 6/16/2004]
The surge of warnings around this time could be related to these original preparations. By mid-July, US intelligence will learn of this delay
Originally posted by JJay55
reply to post by Donny 4 million
No, my agenda isn't fear. Those are your words. Not mine.
Your behavior is called projection.
The truth is: 911 is a coptic Christian holiday. Period. That simple.
The goal of Islam is world domination. The Islamic leadership is trying to tell you but there are those who don't want to understand this simple fact. Then they have to demonstrate with events on 911 like taking down the WTC. "Awakening" "Opening eyes"... very clear pattern for the dhimmis who are considered pigs and dogs... and unintelligent. Yes, it is unintelligent not to understand this language and message from Islam.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
reply to post by mmiichael
"With the master what is new and significant develops vigorously amid the 'manure' of contradictions out of the contradictory phenomena. ..." (Karl Marx)
Is this any where near what I think you are saying about Why 911?
It seems quite similar.
Karl figured that out without any numbers atol.
I see how you and jj are not in the same bed on that one. Metaphorically speaking.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
The CIA/government chose that date because
1. GW was in Florida, thus he was to far from control and risk
2. People were going to get suspicious in the WTC at the constant power outages etc occurring
3. Perhaps the chemicals used to bring down the WTC could erode or chemically react causing a misfire or prematurely explode.
4. Maybe the FBI was getting to close to the patsy’s or pawns in Florida?
5. Maybe the car in the parking lot would cause suspicion if no one claimed it?
6. Maybe John O’Neil found something?
Originally posted by Mind1universe
It was choosed for occult reasons, nothing to do with that whack at all.
It's what you don't know was the reason they did it, for you to know the end of it "there way"
What do I mean by that
Figure it out. When you do, do something about it and change.
posted by Mind1universe
It was choosed for occult reasons, nothing to do with that whack at all.
It's what you don't know was the reason they did it, for you to know the end of it "there way"
What do I mean by that
Figure it out. When you do, do something about it and change.
posted by JJay55
I understand what you are saying.
Their way is exactly right. Occult in their language is not the word "occult".
Originally posted by SPreston
Is that what you believe also? Why were you not upfront with us instead of trying to smother us with all this Islam taking over the world by 2020 nonsense? Why are you fostering rascist attacks against a large group of fellow residents of Planet Earth? Hasn't Islam already been attacked far too much by the greedy nations and corporate billionaires lusting after their oil and opium?
Originally posted by SPreston
Is that what you believe also? Why were you not upfront with us instead of trying to smother us with all this Islam taking over the world by 2020 nonsense? Why are you fostering rascist attacks against a large group of fellow residents of Planet Earth? Hasn't Islam already been attacked far too much by the greedy nations and corporate billionaires lusting after their oil and opium? n't you take your occult to the religion forum? This is the 9/11 Conspiracies Forum.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Some questions Jjay, if you don't mind. I've been following what you have been posting and it is pretty close to what I've been told by other knowledgeable people.
Unfortunately the massive PR campaign convince the West the Muslim world is only responding to historical transgressions of imperialism, colonialism, invasion, has worked. The enforced focus is on Israel as the model of their oppression.
I do not understand clearly how the Middle East's gender imbalance issue you refer to will manifest itself.
I am also unclear where the polarization in the region between Saudi Sunni/Wahhabist interests and the emerging Shiite competition spearheaded by Iran is moving.
I have great problems with the Shhiite methodolgy and goals, but see them roughly analogous to what the Communists represented in the 20th Century with their adversity to Western democratic Capitalism. The Shiites are confronting the Saudi despotic monopoly of Islam and increasing their sphere of influence.
How will this play out in the long term?
Mike
Originally posted by JJay55
Gender imbalance= If women move out of the war zone then they will breed elsewhere. If there are no native women then men will start breeding with outside populations. Already there is a baby boom to breed more muslim babies to fight in 13 years when they are ripened. Population increases in foreign lands... or something like that.
Shia overflow will begin in Iran and spill into Syria, ending with the burning of oil fields before a major escalation... in the next couple of years. Importantly, Shia and Sunni are brothers when it comes down to teaming against non-Muslims and the West. Sunni Saudi has the money. The ironic part that if our strategy was to use Saddam against the Saudis we would have had a strong ally. Unfortunately... well... the old timer generals have slowly been replaced in the Pentagon.
Long term? Until WMD are used we have to play battlefield. So Afghanistan will take more American lives as we increase troops there. This plays into the 7 phase plan perfectly as the West keeps weakening.
There was a plan to hit a dozen cities in the US... I don't think that was cancelled. Look for that attempt in 2010-2011. Ramadan and Quds day are coming up. I dunno, it's quiet out there for now, that usually means there is alot going on behind the scenes. I haven't been able to find out anything for about 6 months now.
Originally posted by JJay55
reply to post by Mind1universe
What if it is about religion?
Don't cast something aside that you don't understand for an easy answer that fits into most defense mechanisms. Epistemology and hermeneutics will point you in the right direction, but it's hard work. Much easier to write something off than to look it directly in the face.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Originally posted by JJay55
Gender imbalance= If women move out of the war zone then they will breed elsewhere. If there are no native women then men will start breeding with outside populations. Already there is a baby boom to breed more muslim babies to fight in 13 years when they are ripened. Population increases in foreign lands... or something like that.
Shia overflow will begin in Iran and spill into Syria, ending with the burning of oil fields before a major escalation... in the next couple of years. Importantly, Shia and Sunni are brothers when it comes down to teaming against non-Muslims and the West. Sunni Saudi has the money. The ironic part that if our strategy was to use Saddam against the Saudis we would have had a strong ally. Unfortunately... well... the old timer generals have slowly been replaced in the Pentagon.
Long term? Until WMD are used we have to play battlefield. So Afghanistan will take more American lives as we increase troops there. This plays into the 7 phase plan perfectly as the West keeps weakening.
There was a plan to hit a dozen cities in the US... I don't think that was cancelled. Look for that attempt in 2010-2011. Ramadan and Quds day are coming up. I dunno, it's quiet out there for now, that usually means there is alot going on behind the scenes. I haven't been able to find out anything for about 6 months now.
Thanks again for the insightful reply, Jjay.
From what I’ve been picking up, the average Muslim man is being indoctrinated that it his sacred duty to produce babies who will grow up to fight in the Holy War. An odd conversation a woman who worked for me had with an ardent believer of this. She’s very white European... He told her it was very wrong for Western women to have families – virtually a crime. They are aware of the rapidly imbalanced demographics where birthrates have dropped dramatically in the West
I agree the Sunni Shiite territorial conflict is sublimated in the war on the West. Iran has been hoping to rally a following among the poor in places like Egypt, being seen as the noble champions opposing Western domination, particularly the US. It is an agreed goal for all is at the top of the elimination agenda.
I agree as terrible as Saddam was, he was the perfect foil for Iran, maintaining an unsteady equilibrium in the region. Even when imprisoned he kept saying they’d want him back. As idealistic as the notion may be of people being given leaders to choose, the people want strong paternalism. Someone who takes control with force. The notion of leadership chosen by putting an “X” on a piece of paper seems weak – almost effeminate...
As for the full scale war – I don’t know for sure. I do see that the Muslims are winning. But they have their religious histrionic emotionalism which can interferes with making cold rational decisions that will benefit the populace. America with Europe, still have the advantage of weaponry that can cause mass destruction in the Middle
The West has watched as the Muslim Middle East squander it’s oil largesse instead of building up working economies and advancing education, commerce, industry. As wealthy as the Saudis may be, they have prepared an exit strategy, mainly to Britain. Their loyalty is only to their family. If the people of Saudi Arabia end up being sacrificial pawns, it troubles them little.
Is the long term strategy of the West to wait till the Middle East has pushed too far, and then strike hard with impunity? We’ll find out.
Mike