It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Leveller - what?! so you STILL believe that this a copy of the Cearnue Rite, McClenechan was English and that the 32nd Degree does not revolve around the initiation of a Novice into the Order Knights Templar
Originally posted by akilles
A completely different ritual with a completely different meaning.
So you have undergone both?
So Zoroastrians were in no way involved with sacrifice?
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Satanic Ritual calling upon the Aryan ancesters in Madam Blavatsky style!
You really have outdone yourself this time - as tempted as I am to go around telling everyone you've finally 'fessed up to being "a devil worshipping baby eater etc....
Originally posted by akilles
A completely different ritual with a completely different meaning.
So you have undergone both?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
You've been told this about a million times before: McLenachan's monitor describes a 32° ritual based on the workings of the ritual by the Supreme Council of the Northern Jurisdiction USA and Supreme Council of England. This version of the 32° is ok I guess, but you've completely missed the point here: the Southern Jurisdiction uses the Albert Pike Version, which is a completely different ritual with a completely different meaning. I've even given you sources where you can read the basics of the ritual yourself ("A Bridge To Light" by Rex Hutchens, "Legenda of the 32°" by Albert Pike, and Chapter 32 of Morals and Dogma).
The Pike Version isn't about Templary; the Templar degrees of the Southern Jurisdiction are the 27°, 29°, 30°, and 33°. The 32° of the Pike System is concerned with philosophy, not chivalry, and is based in the symbolism of Zoroastrianism and the Magi.
Simply put, the ritual you claim is the 32° is no such thing; hell, a closer description of the real degree can be read on anti-Masonic site here:
www.dccsa.com...
The interpretations there (for example, claiming that Ahura Mazda and Mithra are supposed to be the devil) are certainly ludicrous, but the basic description of the ceremony itself is generally accurate, or, at least more so than yours.
[edit on 15-3-2005 by Masonic Light]
Originally posted by senrak
We're all wasting our time on Necros. He's CONVINCED what he has is current. And since he'll NEVER see the actual degrees of Freemasonry conferred (without risking the loss of his girlfriend or toilet again...) He'll never know.
Originally posted by senrak
I don't see that a nerve has been hit. Fact remains Chas. T. McClenachan's "Book of the Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite" was a Monitor (exoteric portions of ritual) for the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction (a Jurisdiction plagued with "Cerneauism" and other schism from it's beginning) and NOT the so-called "Mother Supreme Council" (the Southern Jurisdiction) What you've posted from CTM's book is not only NOT secret...it's no longer current. The NMJ has revised it's rituals continuously for many years. So much so that they barely resemble the rituals of other Supreme Councils (even those of the SJ in Washington DC)
You have been taught this in those Degrees, conferred in the Lodge of Perfection, which inculcate particularly the practical morality of Freemasonry. To be true, under whatever temptation to be false; to be honest in all your dealings, even if great losses should be the consequence; to be charitable, when selfishness would prompt you to close your hand, and deprivation of luxary or comfort must follow the charitable act; to judge justly and impartially, even in your own case, when baser impulses prompt you to do an injustice in order that you may be benefited or justified ; to be tolerant, when passion prompts to intolerance and persecution; to do that which is right, when the wrong seems to promise larger profit; and to wrong no man of anything that is his, however easy it may seem so to enrich yourself;-in all these things and others which you promised in those degrees, your spiritual nature is taught and encouraged to assert its rightful dominion over your appetites and passions.
The philosophical degrees have taught you the value of knowledge, the excellence of truth, the superiority of intellectual labor, the dignity and value of your soul, the worth of great and noble thoughts; and thus endeavored to assist you to rise above the level of the animal appetites and passions, the pursuits of greed and the miserable struggles of ambition, and to find purer pleasure and nobler prizes and rewards in the acquisition of knowledge, the enlargement of the intellect, the interpretation of the sacred writing of God upon the great pages of the Book of Nature.
Originally posted by svcadet32
correct me if i am wrong, but its seems to me that some SR mason treat the NJ like a red headed stepchild.
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by svcadet32
correct me if i am wrong, but its seems to me that some SR mason treat the NJ like a red headed stepchild.
The Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction (note the word "Masonic" is not used in the title for some reason) and the Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite, Northern Masonic Jurisdiction are two separate and distinct Supreme Councils. The NMJ (like all Supreme Councils) was chartered by or in direct lineage from the SJ, other than that there is no connection, no overlap. So they're neither child nor step-child. They're a sovereign body. I was merely pointing out the differences between the two ritual-wise....and there are a LOT of differences.