It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Ah, ok. Here, nothing is allowed to be written, and both the Ritual and Catechism can be communicated only verbally.
Fiat Lvx.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
And again you fail to answer a question that should be obvious even to a child.
You HAVE NOT posted a reply to this very straightforward question but to call you a liar is unnecessary.
Let me get this right, you are now claiming that Charles T McClenechan's �Book of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite (1884)� is a fake?
Which still does not explain (sigh...again...), if the ritual as I have posted it is not the REAL thing, then why is its regalia and tracing board ("The Camp") EXACTLY the same as the one on a REAL apron?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
I agree with Theron. Freemasonry is extremely practical if one applies the teachings of the Fraternity to daily life.
Otherwise, Masonry is a waste of words.
Fiat Lvx.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Looks like I've hit a nerve somewhere - there is nearly a whole page of off topic discussion and filibustering.
My apologies that I haven�t been able to post the full book yet but I need to set up some commercial web space, which may take a little time.
If by chance there are any non-masons reading this thread then it must seem odd to them how people are banging on about some obscure French Rite etc�and insinuating that �The Past Grand Master of Ceremonies for the Mother Supreme Council� has managed to spend seven years of his life writing a thesis for �those who wish to study the higher walks of Freemasonry� accidentally using the term, the Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite several hundred times in the book when he meant to say Cernaeu Rite or other such nonsense.
Although I posted the History section from the book almost immediately after the 32nd Degree description, I am linking to them here for the sake of clarity.
Please read the 8-10 or so pages and then look back at the ridiculous nonsense posted by the self-appointed experts in this thread and have a bit of a chuckle.
users.tpg.com.au...
Incidentally in the 14th degree it is revealed that there are in fact 2 perfect ashlars in any lodge, for the rough ashlar contains a perfect ashlar not yet revealed.
The true difference between the rough and the perfect ashlars is that one still holds it secrets although to the untrained and ignorant it appears to be indistinguishable from a rough and unbalanced stone (which has no place within a lodge.)
Take that however you like it.
In 1868 This exalted Rite is in full tide of prosperity
and healthful progress; it's sublime teachings find a ready
response in every Masonic heart; fraternal association
binds man to his fellow, and the profane world may recieve
a lesson of wisdom and humanity through a careful observance
of its beautiful precepts.
Originally posted by senrak
I'll step in here and say "ditto" to the last two posts. Masonry, while it is intended to benefit mankind as a whole...does so by benefiting the indivitual...who, in turn, is to benefit mankind. One may read about Masonry (including its rituals/ceremonials..etc.) and perhaps gain a better understanding of it...but one has to truly "experience" Masonry before it can ever benefit him. That's the only real "secret" that Masonry holds. Sure, we have some pass-words, signs, grips, etc....but that is NOT Masonry. Masonry is in the heart of the individual and it can NEVER be told....experience is the only way to truly understand and appreciate it. ...and in this same light...Masonry is NOT for every man.
Originally posted by slickwilly95991
Originally posted by MrNECROS
...some rather thinly veiled Freemason trying to pretend he is an independent third party...
What is my objection to Freemasonry?
Personally I'm a bit miffed by being drugged senseless and having a bunch of neo-pagan loonies try to brainwash me into one of their own and then spending the last 3 years trying to silence/destroy me.
On the greater scale of things, the existence of a secret religious society that believes that cowardice, deceit and trickery are the cornerstones of "leadership" is not only immoral but dangerously self destructive.
Please attempt to stay on topic, I�d appreciate if someone other than myself would provide actual resources to this thread, opinions are like arseholes � everyone has got one.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Personally I'm a bit miffed by being drugged senseless and having a bunch of neo-pagan loonies try to brainwash me into one of their own and then spending the last 3 years trying to silence/destroy me.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
I�ve now got someone saying that the whole of the Northern Jurisdiction in 1884 was so overrun with corruption that the rituals & monitors I�m posting are completely irrelevant.
[snip]
What is my objection to Freemasonry?
Personally I'm a bit miffed by being drugged senseless and having a bunch of neo-pagan loonies try to brainwash me into one of their own and then spending the last 3 years trying to silence/destroy me.