It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jenna
I said I wanted it settled, as in I want the whole mess to just go away once and for all.
Not once did I say he was born in Kenya, not once did I say anything that even closely resembles a claim as to where he was born. So yes, I'd say there's a reading comprehension problem here when you take a sentence that says "I want the whole thing settled already" and somehow try to twist that into "OMG!!! He, like, totally wasn't born in the US!!1!1"
And frankly you're not one to talk about sending U2U's.
www.factcheck.org...
He held both U.S. and Kenyan citizenship as a child, but lost his Kenyan citizenship automatically on his 21st birthday.
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom's dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children:
British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.
In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.
www.fightthesmears.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com...
FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
www.oilforimmigration.org...
I brought my law suit against the NJ Secretary of State to rid the ballots of McCain, Obama and Calero. Yet, I have been called a racist more times than I can count. Furthermore, I have never said that the definition of natural-born citizen has been certainly determined in the courts. I simply pointed out various historical cases and comments which support the definition I believe is most on point – that to be President one must be born in the US to parents without foreign allegiance who are US citizens.
It’s hardly a fringe concept to expect and demand that the Commander in Chief was never a citizen of another nation.
“That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”
That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr. He has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.
And this leads to the relevant question:
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?
A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States. This is the core issue before the Supreme Court of the United States.
Originally posted by Jenna
Edit: Not worth the trouble of repeating myself again.
[edit on 30-7-2009 by Jenna]
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by evil incarnate
Ahh, I see. I stop responding to your U2U's so you start on me here. Absolutely brilliant. Welcome to ignore. Have fun taking your anger and hostility out on someone that can't see you.
Originally posted by Majic
So, Where's The Beef?
Here we are, 13 pages along in this thread and so far I haven't seen any evidence that the source article's claim is true.
Leaving aside the obvious question of how so much dialog could be generated on the basis of so little fact, I'm kind of hoping us ATSers can get to the bottom of all this.
Is it true that Maya Soetoro has a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth?
If so, where is it? What foundation is this claim based on?
I tried googling it and haven't found anything credible. Did I miss something? Can someone point out where the evidence is?
Can anyone -- anyone at all -- substantiate this claim, or is this entire thread based on a lie?
Originally posted by EYE SEE
reply to post by debunky
Actually - both parents (and especially the father) have to be u.s. citizens in order for the child to be "natural born" citizen. Which brings me to this point - the b.c. whether real or not - makes no different.
His father was not US citizen, which even Barry doesn't deny. So, he is obviously an illegitimate president, whether his b.c. is accurate or not (which I strongly believe is forged, by the way).
Originally posted by EYE SEE
I can't help you on that one, but I can tell you that Obama's mother used a soc sec # that belongs to a lady living in the next city to me, who was apparently born about a month apart from his mother. She is still living, and has no idea why Stanley Ann Dunham used her soc sec #. Another interesting thing, you may already know, is that Barry used many different soc sec #'s. The one he used the most belonged to Barack Hussein Obama who would now be 119 years old!!!! Wierd, huh? Hmmmm
Originally posted by TheAmused
Originally posted by nasdack24k
Originally posted by iamjesusphish
Why is this getting so much attention so fast. His sisters place of birth means nothing about his... enough already...
It does hold meaning, if she's admittedly born in Indonesia yet has, in her name, the same piece of paper Obama is trying to use as evidence he was born in Hawaii...
2month's ago i would be with ya fighting this issue tooth and nail.
But let's face it The "WHO CARE'S"crowd has won this .
Just like during the election they voted him and didn't care.
Congress has passed it..Hawaii is his birth state.
He sealed everything from college records to blood donations he gave.
Has obama ever been arrested?
We all know the crooked and EVIL G.W.B was he let us see his record's
So if bush showed us his arrest college record's ect....
Why is obama so special he doesn't have to and can pass law's threw so he does not have to?
People can say what they want..
He is
Or he isn't.
But the fact remains the man is trying to hide something from the AMERICAN people.
And i want to know why.
What's that behind your back little kid?
Nothing...
Well show me then if your hiding nothing.
Sorry i passed a law saying i do not have to show you what's behind my back.
Did he have anything behind his back?
I would say Hellz yes he did.
and thus obama is hiding something folk's.
what it is idk.
Originally posted by evil incarnate
Originally posted by EYE SEE
reply to post by debunky
Actually - both parents (and especially the father) have to be u.s. citizens in order for the child to be "natural born" citizen. Which brings me to this point - the b.c. whether real or not - makes no different.
That is blatantly not true. It is either incorrect or a lie. It has been said here a few times along with the idea that anyone with a stamp can get a Hawaiin BC. Neither one of those is even a little bit true.
Okay - I have tried to copy and paste this, but go to "natural born citizen chart" and you will see that BOTH parents and especially the father - must be U.S. citizens for the child to be natural born. End of story. Even Barry says his dad was not U.S. citizen. So whaddya say? Whaddya know? The man is a Usurper - and don't you have to at least ask WHY would he want to be our president, knowing he doesn't qualify? What web is he - or the ptb behind his back = weaving? WHY all the hiding of history, background? Do you know who this man IS? Do any of us? Where in the world did he come from? Something smells very, very, very, very fishy!
His father was not US citizen, which even Barry doesn't deny. So, he is obviously an illegitimate president, whether his b.c. is accurate or not (which I strongly believe is forged, by the way).
So our representatives, all of the presidential candidates and the majority of American voters just happen to not know this but three people on a conspiracy website do?
Originally posted by EYE SEE
Originally posted by evil incarnate
Originally posted by EYE SEE
reply to post by debunky
Actually - both parents (and especially the father) have to be u.s. citizens in order for the child to be "natural born" citizen. Which brings me to this point - the b.c. whether real or not - makes no different.
That is blatantly not true. It is either incorrect or a lie. It has been said here a few times along with the idea that anyone with a stamp can get a Hawaiin BC. Neither one of those is even a little bit true.
Okay - I have tried to copy and paste this, but go to "natural born citizen chart" and you will see that BOTH parents and especially the father - must be U.S. citizens for the child to be natural born. End of story. Even Barry says his dad was not U.S. citizen. So whaddya say? Whaddya know? The man is a Usurper - and don't you have to at least ask WHY would he want to be our president, knowing he doesn't qualify? What web is he - or the ptb behind his back = weaving? WHY all the hiding of history, background? Do you know who this man IS? Do any of us? Where in the world did he come from? Something smells very, very, very, very fishy!
His father was not US citizen, which even Barry doesn't deny. So, he is obviously an illegitimate president, whether his b.c. is accurate or not (which I strongly believe is forged, by the way).
So our representatives, all of the presidential candidates and the majority of American voters just happen to not know this but three people on a conspiracy website do?
Oh, they know it. They're playing with it like a kitten with a mouse - they're gonna use it when it makes a boom for them - cat and mouse - they know it - don't know quite what to do about it - it has never happened before - there is no precedent - house of cards all falling down. They all want to use it for their own good. Think. It is widely known by the ptb. But how best to use this info? When best?
Originally posted by EYEOFEAGLE
reply to post by evil incarnate
Maybe this will clear things up for you. Read the whole thing if you can bare it.
www.scribd.com...
eye of Eagle
Originally posted by EYE SEE
Oh, they know it. They're playing with it like a kitten with a mouse - they're gonna use it when it makes a boom for them - cat and mouse - they know it - don't know quite what to do about it - it has never happened before - there is no precedent - house of cards all falling down. They all want to use it for their own good. Think. It is widely known by the ptb. But how best to use this info? When best?
Originally posted by EYE SEE
reply to post by debunky
Actually - both parents (and especially the father) have to be u.s. citizens in order for the child to be "natural born" citizen. Which brings me to this point - the b.c. whether real or not - makes no different.
His father was not US citizen, which even Barry doesn't deny. So, he is obviously an illegitimate president, whether his b.c. is accurate or not (which I strongly believe is forged, by the way).
Originally posted by debunky
Edit to add:
"Both parents, especially the father"? Whut? So both need to be US, but the father needs to be US more? Huh? How is that supposed to work?
[edit on 1-8-2009 by debunky]