It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Longchenpa
reply to post by zorgon
so why did you post links to this absurd mockumentary worthy of the Onion in sillyness? Is that the kind of stuff you want your research associated with?
Originally posted by Egyptia
It would be wonderful to have access to the texts that have been protected by the White Brotherhood as well as the himalayan monks not to mention the many other factions of secret organizations that have been guarding precious information. But what we do have access to is sufficient to discern the truth about our past.
Originally posted by Egyptia
What I have discovered in my research is that some people will try to put a message out disguised with fakery and disinformation. There usually is always a remnant or a message of truth connected to some but the process of eliminating the false from the truth is a challenge.
Originally posted by GEX
zorgon and everybody can you listen to the beginning of the video again and tell me the name of the cosmonaut and a space capsule? I think I heard the name of Andrey Andropov,
Originally posted by Longchenpa
so why did you post links to this absurd mockumentary worthy of the Onion in sillyness? Is that the kind of stuff you want your research associated with?
Originally posted by hisshadow
I think we should go directly to testing !
if i remember correctly, resonance builds up and increases vibrations without the need of ramping up the harmonizer power
and i do see a problem that possible the stone could vibrate itself to dust before lift off. But with all ideas, it has to start somewhere
Originally posted by hisshadow
there has to be something to it, after all coral castle was built in 1923 but seems the builder took what he knew to the grave with him. For those that don't know, coral castle seems to have been built using the same levitation of monsterous stones just like the pyramids
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by hisshadow
there has to be something to it, after all coral castle was built in 1923 but seems the builder took what he knew to the grave with him. For those that don't know, coral castle seems to have been built using the same levitation of monsterous stones just like the pyramids
There was a great thread here about someone working on breaking that code... it was well done bu I cannot find it right now. Search brought up other small threads, mostly debunkers, but the one I saw was an in depth study of the clues left behind. Maybe someone else recalls it
Originally posted by hisshadow
and with a little change in gravity theory makes it sound hopefull, like what if gravity was really ripples in space caused by movement..
Originally posted by BlasteR
The images also remind me of the idea of ancient egyptian artwork like the "Dendera lightbulb". Remember these images? (sorry if already posted).
Zeichnung Garn-Birne
"If we evacuate a glass bulb with two metal parts reaching into it (B), (C), we can see a discharge at much lower levels, depending on the size of the glass balloon (D). At a pressure of about 40 t (tonnes) (40 mm of mercury) a snakelike light filament meanders from one metal part to the other (E). If we evacuate further, the light filament grows wider until it fills the whole glass balloon. This is exactly what we see in on the pictures in the subterranean chambers of the Hathor sanctuary."
Source: Krassa/Habeck; Das Licht der Pharaonen, Herbig 1992, p. 239
Originally posted by BlasteR the "Dendera lightbulb".
A Crookes tube is an early experimental electrical discharge tube, invented by British physicist William Crookes[1] and others around 1869-1875,[2] in which cathode rays, that is electrons, were discovered.[3]
An evolution of the Geissler tube, it consists of a partially (but not completely) evacuated glass cylinder of various shapes, with two metal electrodes at either end. When a high voltage is applied between the electrodes, electrons travel in straight lines from the cathode to the anode. It was used by Crookes, Johann Hittorf, Juliusz Plücker, Eugen Goldstein, Heinrich Hertz, Philipp Lenard and others to discover the properties of cathode rays, culminating in J. J. Thomson's 1897 identification of cathode rays as negatively-charged particles, which were later named electrons. Crookes tubes are now used only for demonstrating cathode rays.
Wilhelm Röntgen discovered x-rays with the Crookes tube in 1895. The term is also used for the first generation, cold cathode x-ray tubes,[4] which evolved from the experimental Crookes tubes and were used until about 1920.
Plasma was first identified in a Crookes tube, and so described by Sir William Crookes in 1879 (he called it "radiant matter").[1] The nature of the Crookes tube "cathode ray" matter was subsequently identified by British physicist Sir J.J. Thomson in 1897,[2] and dubbed "plasma" by Irving Langmuir in 1928,[3] perhaps because it reminded him of a blood plasma.[4] Langmuir wrote:
Except near the electrodes, where there are sheaths containing very few electrons, the ionized gas contains ions and electrons in about equal numbers so that the resultant space charge is very small. We shall use the name plasma to describe this region containing balanced charges of ions and electrons.[3]
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Longchenpa
so why did you post links to this absurd mockumentary worthy of the Onion in sillyness? Is that the kind of stuff you want your research associated with?
Yes... because the story has value. I am sorry you do not understand that, but judging by most of the posts in this thread I would say that the majority are getting something of value. Last I checked ATS was still the top board on the net to explore speculative and alternative concepts. I know I have already gotten way more response than I expected
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
The problem is that even if the ideas being discussed are valid, the nature of the videos detracts from them and makes them easier to dismiss out of hand.
The red flags for me were:
The guy saying the pyramids are visible from the moon.
The 'experts' were clearly actors performing from a script; normal people just don't talk like that and like someone else pointed out, they were never introduced.
The way the 'parents' who were abducted in the film just happened to be the only two people who were shot in lingering close up.
The Sci-Fi channel logo
Not trolling, just my two cents