It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by octotom
If you think that Christianity is backwards and garbage, why are you wasting your time discussing it? I don't go to my neighbors and talk about trash.
Originally posted by octotom
reply to post by speakplain
Another in the daily line of Christian bashing threads.
That's exactly what I thought when I saw the thread earlier this morning. Is it me, or are there more and more of these lately?
Originally posted by Kapyong
Gday,
Originally posted by teapot
Given as that original sin is defiance of God, Mary the mother of Jesus, the woman who was faithful (to God) in the extreme, was the Immaculate Conception, also translated as virgin.
...
Reference to the virgin birth is not strong enough to refute the validity of the Christian faith.
You have confused two different things :
* the virgin birth (Mary's birth of Jesus)
* the immaculate conception (Anne's conception of Mary)
A common error.
K.
Originally posted by makinho21
reply to post by teapot
You make some pretty ridiculous points, that more or less have no bearing on the validity of this stupid fable you believe in. First off - yes artificial insemination does exist, however you need sperm. It only came about 1884. So fail on that point - mind you it didn't help your case because it requires SPERM.
Asexual reproduction ofcourse does exist. Humans do not reproduce asexually. We do not have the mechanism for it. Even hermaphrodites, who are born with both pairs of sexual organs are unable to reproduce - the organs don't work properly. They are usually sterile due to chromosomal malfunction. Anyways, there is no reason to bring this up other than try and make it seem as if it supports your outlandish dogma - which it doesn't.
Furthermore it sounds like you are talking about parthenogenesis, which does occur in the animal kingdom, however, it has never been documented in humans or mammals to occur naturally. Basically it is cloning so unless Jesus looked like a Jewish tramp (ie: his mother) then this has no place in our debate. If that is what you want to cling to, in desperate hope of somehow making sense of your ludicrous believe, so be it, but don't try and twist fact to support your fiction.
Originally posted by makinho21
reply to post by Totakeke
I think Roman Catholicism is part of Christianity is it not?
Christianity is all around me and unfortunately, Christians don't seem happy until I believe what they believe. Why not keep their delusions to themselves? They can't...and they won't be satisfied until they push their trash on everyone else - much like some Muslims I know.
Originally posted by IntastellaBurst
'
The very notion of organized religion is primitve and fear based. The people who follow are sheep looking for a shepard, ... without the intelligence or courage to blaze their own trail.
Buddy if you try and tell Catholics they are not "Christian" - they will probably try to give you a smack. Your link is to some obscure theory that is obviously intended for born-agains and evangelicals to use against Catholics, but the fact remains - Catholics are Christian.
Originally posted by ZenOnKwalsky
I dont care what You can invent against God. I simply like Christianity...Not only the ideals of mercy and tolerance but also the Holy Cruasades and the way it keept the godles islamists and likes of you away...
[edit on 24-7-2009 by ZenOnKwalsky]
They believe in Jesus Christ - they believe he rose from the dead and he is the son of the god (and/or is god or whatever).