Woman Wants To Use Indecency Law To Stop Droopy Pants

reply to post by Solomons


WOW we have a expert in the house

Yeah i understand what your saying but i've seen some locals in my city have them pretty dam low where they are not even on they have just undressed and not taken them off their feet

but overall your right.

reply to post by tothetenthpower


oh right well i still have the advantage because theres lots of land to cover till you taser or use your crazy things on me

lets get back on topic lol

[edit on 9-7-2009 by thecrow001]

reply to post by Kevin_X2


I don't care what people wear, to be honest. I just don't want to some dude's butt.

Most of the time I am out in public, I have to be dressed proper and business-like. However, other times you can be sure I sag...

Thank goodness the US was the only place where it was popular to ONLY wear pants that looked like they had taken a dump in them. I had no idea they were still wearing them. The jean style in most of the world has gone to snug fitting with straight legs

It's not a fashon statement it's a lifestyle one. It means I'm gay and available. Ask any prison guard thats where it started.

Originally posted by Solomons
reply to post by thecrow001

 

The Uk view of droopy pants and the USA's are completely different...droopy pants over their are extreme to say the least,might aswell walk around with your jeans round your ankles...*mostly* in the uk the shape of the bum is still partially visible...anyway,i dont know where im going with this...

Nah I've seen both in the UK.

reply to post by mikellmikell


Wow that was a very ignorant statement. So you're saying that everybody who wears baggy pants are gay and available?

Ridiculous....

Due to the recent trend in hip hop fashion to revert back to the "old school" gaining popularity, the clothing is becoming similar to early 80's form of dressing. It has geared toward a more Hipster-inspired style of dressing with a nod towards irony, and may include items such as slim-fit denim jeans, tighter-fitting "vintage style" t-shirts with shorter arm sleeves, polo shirts, sportcoats, woven button shirts, large ornamental belt buckles, cufflinks, skull and skeleton decorations, Ed Hardy and Sailor Jerry tattoo inspired motifs, elaborately decorated zip-up hoodies, trucker hats, lumberjack button-ups or plaid designed shirts, keffiyehs, and snow inspired fashions.

Shorter length t-shirts have become involved in recent trends, in order to expose decorated belts and belt buckles and biker chains. Although the "baggy" style of dress remains relevant, some hip hoppers forego that particular style, opting for colorful fitted and hipster-inspired clothing as exemplified by the growing influence of rappers such as Kanye West, Common, and will.i.am,as well as the tighter-fitting skater influenced styles in the case of Pharrell and Lupe Fiasco.

Source

That's about where it came from, not prison.....

~Keeper

[edit on 7/9/2009 by tothetenthpower]

[edit on 7/9/2009 by tothetenthpower]

reply to post by mikellmikell


LOL if that's really true, then someones gotta tell these guys before they go to prison!!!

Although I have to say the droopy pants thing looks stupid, it's not up to some lawmaker how people dress.

I mean if some dufus is running around with tighty whites on complete with skidmarks it sure is sick to look at but I don't spend my time looking at other mens butts.

Originally posted by tallwater

Woman Wants To Use Indecency Law To Stop Droopy Pants

www.newsnet5.com

A local lawmaker wants her Ohio city to use its law against indecent exposure to go after young people in low-riding pants.

Canton City Councilwoman Mary Cirelli said constituents have raised concerns about how the fashion trend leaves underwear and sometimes bare rear ends visible.

The 70-year-old Democrat said that's rude, and she has sent a memo to the city's law director asking whether Canton's public indecency law would provide some coverage...........

(visit the link for the full news article)

People like this should be shipped out of our country........She has nothing better to do than to try to control and change what ever "she" wants......

She thinks she has the right to and is a close-minded person possibly so she tries to control other people so it fits what she wants....


I don't hate much.....and should not hate anything but i hate people like this........


" droop" pants has nothing to do with anything......If somebody wants to cause trouble, then dammit they will cause trouble, regardless of the clothes they wear......


She is beyond ignorant.....

Yea sagging your pants really low is cheesy and very "douche bagish" now and played out and so 1996................but it does not = crime....

reply to post by tamusan

I just don't want to (see) some dude's butt.

Well....depends on the dude, and the butt!!!

reply to post by weedwhacker


I second that motion friend .

You know it's funny, if she was trying to get girls to stop showing their bra straps in public or not wearing the "low cut" jeans to expose their thongs, it would have been shot down and ridiculed immediatly.

Crazy double standard.

~Keeper

reply to post by tothetenthpower


aye men to that i'll be the one shooting that law down if she tryed that

cant beat those types of jeans.

The women is EVIL



if we are going to ban clothes i say ban sandals with with socks its not good

reply to post by tothetenthpower


Speaking of low-cut jeans....



Darn it! Didn't want ALL of 'em!!!



This one!



[edit on 9 July 2009 by weedwhacker]

Originally posted by thecrow001
reply to post by tothetenthpower

 

aye men to that

i'll be the one shooting that law down if she tryed that

cant beat those types of jeans.

The women is EVIL

if we are going to ban clothes i say ban sandals with with socks

its not good

I think I would rather ban knee socks on men who are wearing shorts. Now talk about a fashion dud which deserves to be made illegal. (looks at her husbands sock drawer and groans)

Harm None
Peace

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by tothetenthpower

 

Speaking of low-cut jeans....



Darn it! Didn't want ALL of 'em!!!

[edit on 9 July 2009 by weedwhacker]

Oh no, I am going to have nightmares from some of those pictures now.

Harm None
Peace

The fashion police indeed.

No longer just a joke, but a reality.

Does the Constitution say anything that allows the .gov to regulate how people dress?

reply to post by Solomons


Actually there was an article about a year ago, Two young adults, entered A Supermarket, to do some shopping, they were apprcahed by security, who asked them to pull thier jeans up, Oh yes this was in the UK. When they refused to do so, they were instructed toleave the supermarket premises, as they were deemed offensive.

But I do aggre withposters, What next teenagers are not allowed to roller skating, skate boarding, do anythinng that those think are deemed inappropiate.

Tenagers are demonised enough as it is. An This what ever she is, is way old fashioned. Come into the year 2010!!!



[edit on 9-7-2009 by Laurauk]

reply to post by Laurauk


could you also link hoodies to this if your wear a hoodie your not allowed to enter shops which i think a B S.

Its a piece of clothing

Someone will call it a racist move.

And it will die about 5 seconds later.