It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by nenothtu
Yeah, sorry 'bout that. Don't mean to repeat posts but I was answering someone from page 1 .
I lived in England for years. Really liked it. My dads family is from Scotland and moved (immigrated) to Montana years ago.
I went to school there and there was much more knife violence than in American schools. Forget tv violence in the US, I saw my first stabbing when I was a kid right near Hampstead Heath.
The UK should never, could never be like the US. But they would be smart to adopt some of our "cowboy" ways.
Originally posted by nenothtuOut of curiosity, do you base your perceptions of America on mainstream media accounts? It's evident you've not been here to see first-hand.
Originally posted by nenothtu
I've seen a couple of terms here that I'm not familiar with, and would appreciate it if someone could define them for me, so I can understand what's being said.
Those terms are "chavs" and "neds".
Never thought I'd be needing another English lesson at my age.
Originally posted by nenothtu
I've seen a couple of terms here that I'm not familiar with, and would appreciate it if someone could define them for me, so I can understand what's being said.
Those terms are "chavs" and "neds".
Never thought I'd be needing another English lesson at my age.
Originally posted by nenothtu
reply to post by woodwardjnr
You've confused "cowboy" ways with "gangsta" ways. They aren't the same thing.
A "cowboy" will live and let live, as long as he isn't attacked. But if he is, he'll unleash hell. Best way I can describe it is that they will do anything in the world they can for you. If they are attacked, however, they'll do anything in the world they can TO you.
A "gangsta" - well, I've covered their attitude previously in this thread.
Originally posted by merkaba93
Here we have another piece of proof that gun control does not work. The poor British who were once able to defend themselves in the face of violent crime have long now been neutered and we can see the effects. The British people should organize and reinstate their right to keep and bare arms so that they might better protect themselves. If criminals knew their prey would likely fight back with lethal force I am sure crime rates would drop dramatically.
I feel fortunate that I live in the US where my basic right of self defense is recognized and I am able to carry a gun with me every day.
I am especially reminded of this today, on July 4th, commemorating the fact that we have a country (well at least we did have a free country at one point) that exists because folks finally got fed up enough with tyranny that they shot the b@stards, and today we still have the same ability.
Gun control is evil.
What say you all? Opinions for or against in the face of this hard data?
www.dailymail.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by colloredbrothers
Belgians have no guns yet crimes are low in this country so your argument doesn't hold water, the reason why theire is so much violence in Britain goes deeper into society philosophics and society structure. Not because they don't have guns.