It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's more sociological than it is fact. It's the phenomenon where humans like to "feel special" - like they're being WATCHED by God, and being His Child, where he can save you and help you as you pray for him.
It's all peachy and makes people feel good and inspired.
Google Video Link |
It's more sociological than it is fact. It's the phenomenon where humans like to "feel special" - like they're being WATCHED by God, and being His Child, where he can save you and help you as you pray for him.
So we have an ancestory going back to Hu 'Son of Heaven' as this last noted link indicates.
freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com...
This shows Hu, is the beginging of this pedigree, and it predates 1800 BC and ends.
So I wonder what can be found googling Hu 'Son of Heaven'?
Not very much, is evidence in many areas to review. We can, be brought back to the Five Hu, the Nomadic Warrior like Non Chinese peoples/tribes causing problems for the Han Dynasty in and around 300 AD., where we started with the Khans in the first place.
Wiki again has a link, as follows en.wikipedia.org...
It gives accounts of the Hu, and confirms their nature and tendancies. It also defines them again, in the Regions of the Steppes and the Black Sea and Eastern Hu is refered to several times. They did live West of China, so this region is quite easy to locate.
Hello
I got side tracked this last while. I was bothered by how the End of a Line came to a conclusion, without much information, when we looked at what details Other's could offer about Cain.
For some silly reason, I had believed Khan = Cain, as in Tubal Cain, was just a different application of Cain and that this was implying Genghis and Kublai were decendants of Cain.
We looked and could Identify them as not being Chinese, and where extremely adept as warriors and at the weapons crafts. They inhabited a region around the Black Sea and the Steppes region. Frequently Warred, but where a mainly Nomadic Peoples, with no specific dwelling place. I found several had long Blonde hair, according to the texts previously offered.
They Warred North, South, East and West, and whenever their habitation place is refered to, it is the edge of the world, or unkown regions. When these peoples hit their most influencial periods of their rich history, they encompassed more of the Globe than many of our Western Leaders of History.
A Family rich in glorious deeds, mighty men, men of renown.
Going from the name premise, we started with Genghis and Kublai, and tried to see where we would end, and it was Sort of depressing ending with to details only. Chungvi, ruled the Huns around 1800 BC, and he was decendant of Hu, 'Son of Heaven'
Reviewing what I could locate, I came across some supporting evidence, to confirm the Chinese opinons of the Wei Hu, or Hu, but ran across a difference in the Name as an original. See the Following
www.gateserver.net...
Huns
Many historians consider the '''Huns''' (meaning "person" in Mongolian language) the first Mongolian and Turkic peoples|Turkic people mentioned in European history. They originated from lands between modern day Siberia and Korea, then migrated progressively westward. References in Chinese sources to peoples called the Xiong-Nu (Hsiung-nu) go back to 1200 BC. Their Xiong (匈) rulers, first mentioned as a family in 1766 BC in the story of Chunwei and the fall of the Xia dynasty, may be the ancestors of the later, better-known (to western scholars) Huns, though not all scholars agree. Korean legend takes the stand that an alliance of northern Altaic tribes under a "Huan" ruler from 7193 BC pre-dated the establishment of China.
Huan established rule of the Altaic tribes in 7193 BC
Hello Again
I am not intenting to spend much time on this, but Wikipedia have a Section for the Wu Hu, (Five Hu) that I found interesting. See the following
en.wikipedia.org...
Han definition for Xiongnu
Traditional historians interpreted Hu as barbarians; some further stretched this obsolete analogy to equate Hu with the Xiongnu. Others objected to such similarities, stating that Wu Hu were substantially civilized before the turmoil of the Western Jin Dynasty.
Xiongnu was in fact the most powerful non-Chinese ethnic group neighboring the Chinese Han Dynasty therefore the Han simply referred to them as the Hu (the non-Chinese or the barbarian). Both terms were used concurrently. Nevertheless, Hu later became the collective term for non-Chinese ethnic groups and was often preceded by Chinese numerals and characters such as Wu (five) and Zhu (numerous). A diplomatic message in Han Shu defined Hu as the proud son of heaven (天之驕子) (Chapter 94).
I just thought that was curious. Not only is Hu 'Son of Heaven', but he carries the trait of Cain's forefather, PRIDE.
Originally posted by A Anarchist
We created God, but not in the way you describe. Man created God so that he could keep his fellows down and feel good about it. God is the brainchild of the superstitious and the power-hungry. He doesn't exist within us, because he doesn't exist.
Originally posted by TheSecretTruth
I totally believe that there was this man, this guy called Jesus, who went around, doing truely great things. Helping the sick, the poor and the old.
Originally posted by KarlG
......maybe I should change the title of this post to "MAN created God"? What's the difference?
I'm trying to say COLLECTIVE belief has led to the creation of a God entity, an entity which didn't exist before civilization, because the combined strength of these devotions have forced a singular being INTO EXISTENCE, perhaps in another plane where the will of humans is very strong.
This public belief has birthed the spirit out of their imaginations and minds.
Such is what I think happened/is happening for "God".
Meaning, He exists now, but only as a direct consequence of the misplaced belief which could have been directed toward alien entities in the ancient days but has lasted till modern periods.
If MORE people start getting baptised, and becoming "born-again Christians", this God will grow in strength and power. It's just as if more people believing in the Antichrist, or in 2012, so will the "Antichrist" being and the phenomenon of 2012 get stronger.
The idea of "repentence" as A Anarchist has said, is to keep you down, feel ASHAMED of yourself, and let the people in power in your religion have control over you.
Who might these "people in power" be?
Think about it.
The Anti-Christ, likewise, will not come into being UNTIL the general public start giving it weight, by being sad, depressed, horrible about it. We shall wait to see if the Antichrist arrives, otherwise, to, apparently, destroy the world as we know it.
Originally posted by Nightchild
I believe that many participaters in this thread misunderstand the OP. He(?) do not say that God is not real, he is saying that God IS real, but created by Man in a "Summoned" way- kind of the way you summon an Entity with the aid of a Quijaboard, if you will.