It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheStev
Originally posted by Krpano
About the blackbox.
Isnt possible to stream the data directly to the ground instead of holding it bakc in a stupid box that most of the time get realy damaged that they cant get its full content ? This when they find it.
When you consider how many planes are in the air at any given time, and also how many of them are not over the ground (ie ocean), I just don't think this is practical.
But I'm sure there are others more qualified who can clarify this.
Originally posted by Haunebu
Why isn't the Media speculating about a possible terrorist attack?
Seems that i found the answer for my own question.
It seems indeed that the Airbus has a system that transmits some data info to the company while in flight.
Well, it appears to me that as usual we are not beign told "everything".
in fact thats just wrong.
Click on the slideshow below to see some of the victims of flight AF447
Yes it is unpractical to be transmitting data from the black box all the time. But if after impact or catastrophic failure, the box should then send a hard copy all collected data to a base elsewhere.
This would eliminate the task of trying to find the box.
Originally posted by who-me?
reply to post by Haunebu
Pretty heartless part way do their page a big red button an thenin fact thats just wrong.
Click on the slideshow below to see some of the victims of flight AF447
Originally posted by sy.gunson
...It is your failure to follow or keep up with the subject.
Originally posted by Haunebu
Yes, it is wrong, Bild www.bild.de... published pictures of the German victims yesterday on their front page.
A French accident investigator said Wednesday it's unclear whether the chief pilot of Flight 447 was at the controls when the plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean.
Originally posted by Krpano
I really doubt about a terrorist attack.
If it was the case, they would have crashed the plane over some city to create the maximum amount of havoc and not a silent crash like this.
The flight was scheduled to depart at 18:00 GMT, and pushed back from the gate at 18:04 GMT, but because of a rush-hour delay, it took off from runway 27R at 18:25 GMT,
I'd like to point out that no pilot in their right mind would knowingly slam into towering CB.
Remember things are happening very very quickly. If I recall correctly they were traveling upwards of 450knots. That equates to 759 feet per second. Or 7.8 Nautical miles (14.5km) in one minute. Some storm system cells aren't even that big, many are much larger.
1. As above no sane pilot would do so.
2. It was dark they would likely be visually avoiding signs of lightning.
3. There is real evidence of electronic failure, is it possible weather radar was in-opperable.
4. At the flight levels of this incident liquid water - not even super cooled can exist. Radar reflects off water droplets. Therefore they may not of been able to detect the significance of the weather at that particular moment. Weather radar is reliant on returns from lower altitude water detected due too the radar beam width.
Originally posted by who-me?
The mention of debris 37km apart is irrelevant from that altitude and the speed they are traveling.