It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On The contrary, Julius started the bloodline descendant for the Caesars of that era.
Almost all that i have read lists nero as fifth just like i showed you. I knew julius was before them. But, evidently when you talk about roman emperors then this is the time frame they give you. I have seen where Julius was not recongnized because of his bloodline.
The Bible recognizes Augustus; Luke 2:1 Acts 25:21 & 25:25. aside from that, you presume that Revelation would name a name in a particular spot where the verses themselves are virtually devoid of names. It is well known that, as you can understand I am sure, that writing against the Roman empire during those times was taboo. Revelation is mired in mystery. I go on the premise that Revelation was written during or shortly after the time it speaks to. I have offered Nymphidius as the eighth. He reigned for less than a year, assassinated Galba to take the throne and was not of the line of the Julio_Claudio clan. To your point earlier, if Nero represents 666, then why given your leaning to no Caesar being mentioned in revelation?
There were four kings in the year after nero , but the bible doesn't recognize them and only says one will last a short time.
where you previously stated:
The ten horns isn't my interpetation, it is what the Angel told John
Rev. 17:12
These interpretations are not related. It says nothing about Nero. But, as I have said, the 10 kings with no kingdom yet, and power of the king for a day more likely represents the Roman governors whose allegiance is to Caesar, appointed by Caesar and rules depending on who is Caesar.
Also where it talks about the ten horns being ten kings it is talking about 10 nations under nero is the tribulation.
Originally posted by Lastday Prophet
ALL of that and I have yet to see "ONE" scripture that proves that a "MAN" can occupy or ascend out of the bottomless pit, but I am the one in error.
I posted several scriptures that prove that MEN go to Hell, but I am the one in error.
You have not posted anything to confirm that the Beast is a Man, as you, PURE SPECULATION, yes maybe you should go play with your granddaughter, you might learn something. You have not proven anything other than that The Beast will ascend out of the pit. You have only posted the same verses over and over, no conformation verses whatsoever because you have "NONE" If I am the one that is wrong Post The Verses that back up your claim. All you have done is twist the verses in Rev 17 to suit your case.
You are doing the right thing, leave now to avoid further embarassment, anyone who reads this post can clearly see that you have not posted any verses to back up your claim.
Well it is to bad no one read the pieces I told thrm to read or they might know who Apollyon is. It is after all about horses, water and drinking.
Originally posted by ShawNee922Rev.9
[11] And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.
Why do you lack such comprehension skills? Is it stubbornness to admit you are wrong? Did I say the entire Bible from first word to last is metaphor?
Originally posted by Lastday Prophet
Somewhere, you are the one that lacks wisdom.
Re 9:11 And they had a "king" over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.
This is not a metaphor, Firstly he has a Name, Apollyon, He is a Angel, and he is King over a army of 200 million spirit beings:
Allow me to un-confound your confoundedness and therefore set your path away from the recent detour you take.. Symbolism is a representation by means of a symbol, let�s call that �666.� Whereas a metaphor is the application of a word or phrase to mean that which it does not imply, let�s call that the �beast.� And that is what you argue against, a metaphor as in the �beast� not a symbol as in �666.� To wit:
Originally posted by Lastday Prophet
Somewhere, I did not say that there isn't any "SYMBOLISM" used in the bible. What I said is that the 200 million horsemen are exactly that, 200 million spirit beings, the verse goes on to say how they will torment men during the tribulation period.
No? You jest surely? You mean it was a�metaphor? Heavens!
Some more "LIGHT" for you. When it talks about "THE WHORE" that sits upon the Beast, it is not talking about a earthly woman that is a prostitute.
I cannot look for enlightenment where there is none to be found, sorry.
This post is about the numbers of the Beast. If you would like to discuss this subject in further detail, you can do a post and I will join and "ENLIGHTEN" you. LDP
Did I ask that of you? Where?
Oh, to answer your question, YES, I do believe that the seven headed Beast is a Spirit Being.
That is ludicrous, in that you take it literally. Just about every mother has said to their child that they have a bottomless pit, do you take that as so too? I suppose you also expect to see a great red dragon, and a beast rise up from the sea with seven heads and ten horns, a nasty �mortal� gash on same as you proclaim; �Oh look a mortal gash on one of the beast�s heads.� Also, a lamb standing on mount Sion, and a whole slew of horses descending to Earth.
Originally posted by Lastday Prophet
Somewhere, I quess you don't even remember what you post.
You are a very confused person, I am beginning to think you must be a Child.
How old are you 17, 18 maybe.
You have never seen a DEMON or any other SPIRIT BEING and thus is why you lack wisdom in understanding how things work in the Spirit World.
Like I asked you earlier, If you want to discuss this in further detail, do another post and I will "ENLIGHTEN" you. Do not continue this subject here. Do you have the skills to do another post ? Must Not, I asked you earlier to do so but it seems you are intent on continuing this discussion here.
What part do you not understand ?