It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CameronFox
You are claiming the light weight debris that was found 8 miles away was within minutes. I claimed no such thing.
Originally posted by CameronFox
I sometimes wonder why I post in Pilots 4 911 Truth / No Planer threads.
I've seen all kind of off topic rants...
while weedwhacker accepts a photo at face value, without any chain of custody...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
PS....I find it infinitely amusing how all of you continue to parrot the same tired old 'talking points'....dutifully. "...the 90 ton Boeing...", for instance. Priceless, always makes me smile. (Maybe an Aussie won't know why, IF he's even a pilot...)
Well I guess I should have included maintenance repair numbers with serial numbers. Don't they slap a sticker on fuselage parts when they replace them for damage or cracking and keep a record for the FAA? Those look like standard replaceable panels. Wouldn't there be serial numbers on standard parts?
Originally posted by turbofan
reply to post by Killtown7
Star for you!
I guess they dug down pretty deep to find that bandana clean as a whistle
no less!
Maybe they used "Clorox", or "Downy" to get all the dirt out before putting it inside
the plastic baggie? I couldn't get my clothes that clean if my life
depended on it.
So...we have 'proof' of UA93 by recovering a bandana worn by a
terrorist , located in the cockpit.....WAY down in the hole...BUT...
not a single seat, or fabric like Killtown suggests?
How nice of the FBI to prove the existence of UA93 by releasing photos
of head wear, as opposed to seats, landing gear, rims, etc.
I love this thread almost as much as the Taxi Cab challenge, but nobody
wants to play there.
[edit on 14-5-2009 by turbofan]
Originally posted by turbofan
Why do you like to waste my time?
Where is the trouble here?
How can you relate an 8 mile debris field as a result of UA93 impact alone, it was helped with an 8 mile debris field which was blown around by wind?
Please tell me what I'm missing...
Have you even compared the crash site photos between the two flights?
Look at the concentration of debris in either case.
Don't make me link photos to prove a point; i'd hate to waste more time
on this trivial and simple fact.
Originally posted by turbofan
Mods, can we ban this joker?
The damn photos of Shanksville tell all...and this guy just posts up like the photo evidence is imaginary.
How do you debate people that don't use their eyes and constantly lie?
Sorry to say Mr. Cameron Fox, but you can't pretend the pictures don't
exist to support your twisted theory.
Hop in your car and start driving 11 MPH. Tell me how far you get in about 10 minutes.
Then look at the photos and area around the crater.
Put 2+2 together.
Maybe you can try something else? Grab some aluminum sheets, or even
paper and toss it on your lawn.
Wait for an 11 MPH wind and track how far the paper and aluminum moves
in 10 minutes.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Like this "damn" photo take right outside the crater?
Hey, FDR expert, the ground winds were at 11 mph. Care to do a little research and explain to us what the wind speeds were at around 1,000 feet? I can assure you it was MUCH higher than 11MPH. Think for a second why I am asking you this. I know you can do it. I have faith in you!!
I have looked at all of them.... I ask that you look again at the photo above.
You are being put in your place...so you are appealing to other member by attacking me...
Originally posted by Arsenis
besides soft soil or not, that plane would have not burried itself the way the official story claims. a plane hitting the water would show that wings and other parts come off on impact.
Originally posted by turbofan
Wow, look at those rocks and all that dirt!
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/668dd414497e.jpg[/atsimg]
To explain how debris gets blown over an 8 mile radius when aircraft
is shot down?!
Awesome. Took a second look. I made a mistake!!!
Nice rocks, dirt and TREES!
Yes, it shows...seems like more people are on my side about this.
Maybe you can get your friends to tag up some stars for you to make
it look good.
Thanks for the laugh big guy. Gotta run out and play now. Have fun
with your imaginary photos. Maybe you can imagine a green dog
fetching all that non existent debris?
Originally posted by turbofan
My real name is Tino, you don't need to put me in quote. I don't hide
like all of you GL's.
I'm really not sure what wind speeds at 1000 feet have to do with
debris on the ground. Where are you going with this?
So far you haven't shown me any evidence to account for enough
debris to suggest a 757 crashed in and under that crater.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Your claim that the debris found in Baltimore got there very fast. 10 minutes I believe you claim?
Originally posted by turbofan
No, you are misunderstanding. The first witnesses to the crash site
were there within 10 minutes of the impact. Their statements and
photos support that a commerical airliner/757 did not crash there.
We don't see any photo evidence showing enough debris to support
a 757 crash.
If you claim the wind carried a majority of it away, I ask how far
do you believe the plane parts moved within 10 minutes?
Flight 1771 shows an example of debris concentrated near the crash
site. THis is nothing alike UA93 when viewing the photo and video
evidence.
Where are the rims, wheels, landing gear, seats, tail section, etc. that
should have appeared in the crater long before an engine rotor was
recovered?
Originally posted by CameronFox
The debris fields were pretty close. No large recognizable parts. Flight 1771 responder stated "nothing bigger than a suitcase."
Originally posted by turbofan
You are testing my patience with this run-around. You are simply avoiding
my three quesitons and asking new unrelated questions to delay the
inevitable response.
I don't care how big the pieces of debris were. I am asking you WHY
the Shanksville photos DO NOT show a required amount of debris in
proximity to the crater.
I do not care whether someone thought a plane crashed there, or not.
Please tell me what happened to the plane parts! Where did they go?
Show me the photo/video evidence of the crash parts in and around the
crater.
Show me the landing gear, rims, etc. that would have been pulled out
of the crater since you believe a 757 can dig itself into the ground!
Here are several photos of the 'crash site'. Not much to see here: