It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Killtown7
PLEASE give us your estimation of what % of the plane was buried.
posted by SonyAD
Questions:
1. If it wasn't an airliner, what was it?
posted by SonyAD
2. If it wasn't an airliner, why did 'they' crash it in a field? 'They' only wanted to give the impression the WH was a target as well?
posted by SonyAD
Why not crash some gutted (possibly government) aircraft instead?
More difficult to cover up or they just didn't think about it?
Originally posted by turbofan
Unreal.
Are you that foolish to list all of that nonsense when it has absolutely
NOTHING to do with the location of UA93 and its parts?
The only thing you listed in your reply was already corrected in my
previous post which you seem to have trouble understanding.
Wind blowing debris from the crash site DOES NOT equal debris
scattered from the impact force.
Capisce?
I can't believe some people are stupid enough to believe a bandana
was found (no dirt, blood, or wrinkles) from the crater, but the government
cannot supply a photo(s) representing 70 tons of aircraft from the crash
site.
Sometimes I wonder why I debate GL's...
posted by CameronFox
Flight 1771 was over 46 tons of aircraft.... and guess what?? They found a suicide note in the debris written on a barf bag!!!!
posted by CameronFox
Am I "stupid enough" to believe that a barf bag survived flight 1771?
Originally posted by SoloistEstimation? No, I think not. You claim that the official figure is 80% and is from the 9/11 commission report. I ask of you to please show everyone where that figure came from, that shouldn't be a problem now should it?
I don't want an "estimation" , yours or mine.
Originally posted by turbofan
Geez "Cameron Fox", I'd love to insert an infinite amount of laughing
icons to highlight the lack of thought in your reply, but I'll let the
math stand.
CameronFox believes an 11 MPH wind carried debris over 8 miles
within 10 minutes of the media arriving.
Investigators later said the debris was all very light material, such as paper and thin nylon the wind would easily blow. The wind was blowing towards Indian Lake and New Baltimore at 9 knots [10.5 mph]. "According to the NTSB, it is not only possible that the debris is from the crash, it is probable," Crowley said
Originally posted by Killtown7
No, I'm saying the ambassadors at the Flight 93 memorial are reciting the official story, so I take that lady's claim of "80% found in the crater" is the amount of Flight 93 that was supposedly buried under that shallow crater.
Btw, you seem to have a real problem with the claim 80% of Flight 93 was buried under that shallow crater. Why is that?
[edit on 14-5-2009 by Killtown7]
Apparently their little plan went awry, and Flight 93 could not make it to WTC7, or whereever. So perhaps a quick warhead into the strip mine, a quick salting of the area, and burn up the woods later. FBI Investigators bring in the evidence with them and pretend to find it. Explains why body parts turn up later where there were none earlier. Fake the Flight 93 crash and fly it out over the Atlantic for disposal. Make sure Air Traffic Control Chief destroys records.
At Shanksville - no serial numbers
Only known photo - likely created in Italy
posted by weedwhacker
HOW would Saudi terrorists know about WTC7??
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by SPreston
Fake the Flight 93 crash and fly it out over the Atlantic for disposal. Make sure Air Traffic Control Chief destroys records.
UAL93 was seen to be obviously heading to DC.
ATC? Please read the link below: (it is long...)
aal77.com...
Controllers' 9/11 Tape Destroyed, Report Says
By Sara Kehaulani Goo
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 7, 2004; Page A02
Six air traffic controllers provided accounts of their communications with hijacked planes on Sept. 11, 2001, on a tape recording that was later destroyed by a Federal Aviation Administration manager, according to a government investigative report issued yesterday.
It is unclear what was on the tape, but its destruction did little to dispel the appearance that government officials withheld evidence, the report by the Department of Transportation inspector general said.
The report found that an FAA manager tape-recorded an hour-long interview with the controllers just hours after the hijacked aircraft crashed into the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. His intention was to provide the information quickly to the FBI. But months after the recording, the tape was never turned over to the FBI and another FAA manager decided on his own to destroy the tape, crushing it with his hand, cutting it into small pieces and depositing the pieces into several trash cans, the report said.
The existence of the tape and its destruction were revealed in a report that initially was to find whether the FAA had fully cooperated with an independent panel investigating the terrorist attacks after the panel complained last fall that it needed more information from the agency. Inspector General Kenneth M. Mead found that the FAA never intentionally withheld information, but he condemned the managers' actions and said they were required to keep such evidence for five years.
The report said investigators were told that the tape was never listened to, copied or transcribed.
"The destruction of evidence in the Government's possession, in this case an audiotape -- particularly during times of national crisis -- has the effect of fostering an appearance that information is being withheld from the public," the report says. "We do not ascribe motivations to the managers in this case of attempting to cover-up, and we have no indication there was anything on the tape that would lead anyone to conclude that they had something to hide or that the controllers did not properly carry out their duties on September 11. The actions of these managers . . . nonetheless, do little to dispel such appearances."
The FAA yesterday said it had taken disciplinary action against the employee who destroyed the tape. That manager, identified by a source familiar with the investigation as Kevin Delaney, was last week given a 20-day suspension without pay. Delaney appealed that decision, the source said, confirming a report last night by Newsday. The employee who recorded the tape, Mike McCormick, was not subject to a disciplinary procedure and is in Iraq for the FAA, helping to set up an air traffic control system, the source added.
www.washingtonpost.com...
Originally posted by SPreston
Fake the Flight 93 crash and fly it out over the Atlantic for disposal. Make sure Air Traffic Control Chief destroys records.
Originally posted by turbofan
These types of threads really expose the intelligence and logic of an individual.
[edit on 14-5-2009 by trebor451]
At Shanksville - no serial numbers
posted by weedwhacker
You repeated that at least four times, along with photos of fuselage sections. (I am not going to pollute this post with them, people can scroll up). Come on!!! You fully well know there are No Serial Numbers on any of those pieces! No airplane has S/Ns on the parts that comprise the fuselage.
Only known photo - likely created in Italy
posted by weedwhacker
In this, you for some unknown reason announce that is "likely created in Italy"!!! Is that supposed to be some kind of joke?!?
posted by weedwhacker
Finally, the FDR. Again, this is OT, since it's the AAL77 unit(?). Frankly, I have to look into that more, since I've never seen a cylindrical one before. It is the correct color, and has the white stripes....and is obviously charred --- hmmmm, wonder if the S/N was burned to be unreadable?? AND, on 'top' of sooty bootprints??? What an incredible stretch of imagination!! Of course, NO ONE would walk around the thing, bend down and peer closely at it, would they???
Originally posted by SPreston
posted by weedwhacker
In this, you for some unknown reason announce that is "likely created in Italy"!!! Is that supposed to be some kind of joke?!?
You didn't know? Honestly? That photo turned up from some poster in Italy. No other source. Why would some poster in Italy have access to an alleged Pentagon employee who allegedly snapped that photo, and without any chain of evidence or photographic record whatsoever? Doesn't seem suspicious to you?
Originally posted by turbofan
Give me a break CameronFox.
There are several videos of reporters approaching the scene within
minutes of the 'impact'.
Feel free to actually do some research and watch them. I'm sick of
replying to your unfounded nonsense.
A picture and video tells a thousands words...in this case it DEBUNKS you.
Three-year-old Hunter Stoe was helping his father, Andy, with the trash Wednesday night when he spied a slip of paper on the grass near the trash can.