It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WeAreAWAKE
Why does our government insist (and why do we allow) certain groups of people to be "protected" while we (meaning everyone else) are considered unworthy of the same protection? Why am I less important than the pedophile down the road? And with that said...what crime of single-minded violence isn't about "hate"?
Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerouse weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person--
Originally posted by Animal
i don't get it, what about this is 'anti-soldier' or 'pro-pedophile'?
honestly i am getting REALLY tired of the hysteria of the right.
this bill is intended to protect minorities.
H.R. 1913 ~ Read It...
Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The incidence of violence motivated by the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim poses a serious national problem. etc...
I would like someone to find where this bill makes a specific point to protect pedophiles, not that I do not think they do not deserve protection from harm, just that that is NOT the point of this bill.
Calling it like that is simply the right playing the 'wedge issue' card to try to motivate their shrinking 'base' to server their motives.
This is not anti-solder nor pro-pedophile, that is pure crap.
it has more to do with the rights fear of gay rights than anything else. some of the comments in the story linked in the Op are hilarious...
for example:
"I've written extensively about how this bill would criminalize Christianity and turn those who disagree with the homosexual agenda into felons, but criminalizing Christianity is just the beginning of what this bill would do. It would also elevate pedophiles as a special protected class – since the term 'sexual orientation' which has been added to the 'hate crimes' legislation includes them in the American Psychiatric Association's definition of various 'sexual orientations."
If a mother hears that their child has been raped and she slaps the assailant with her purse, she is now gone after as a hate criminal because this is a protected class. There are other protected classes in here. I mean simple exhibitionism. I have female friends who have told me over the years that some guy flashed them, and their immediate reaction was to hit them with their purse. Well now, he's committed a misdemeanor, she has committed a federal hate crime because the exhibitionism is protected under sexual orientation.
"As has proved to be true in both Europe and Canada, this Orwellian piece of legislation is the direct precursor to freedom killing and speech chilling 'hate speech' laws. It represents a thinly veiled effort to ultimately silence – under penalty of law – morally, medically and biblically based opposition to the homosexual lifestyle,"
get a grip people.
[edit on 5-5-2009 by Animal]
Originally posted by Animal
Originally posted by WeAreAWAKE
Why does our government insist (and why do we allow) certain groups of people to be "protected" while we (meaning everyone else) are considered unworthy of the same protection? Why am I less important than the pedophile down the road? And with that said...what crime of single-minded violence isn't about "hate"?
While all violence of course equates to hate, or at least rage, the difference between the laws that protect ALL of us and the special laws that protect minority groups are easily explained.
Minority groups are increasingly under attack in the USA and sadly need to be protected. We are all afforded protection under the laws of the USA but sadly there are those among us who find themselves so motivated by hate that they lash out regardless.
This bill seeks to ad an extra layer of discouragement to those who feel motivated to attack based on 'race, religion, creed, national origin, and sexual preference'.
This bill does not make 'thought crimes' a possibility and it does not make speaking out against something you disagree with illegal, in fact it is quite clear what it does see as a punishable hate crime.
Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerouse weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person--
You can clearly see it only outlaws the attempt to cause physical harm to someone. So all the extreme Christians can continue to speak out against gay/lesbianism, the nazis among us can continue to speak out against all races, creeds, colors and national origin they dislike, Michael Savage continue to bash who ever he wants to among these groups, so on and so forth.
BUT, if you attack someone from this group and it is obviously because they are from one of these minorities, you are gonna do MORE time than you would have prior to the passage of this bill.
To be honest, I can only imagine that at the root of everyone's grievance with this bill MUST be who it is protecting. I mean otherwise WHO CARES? If you really believe that these minorities are NOT under attack more commonly that the rest of us your not paying attention.
If you really believe this bill is bad because it does not protect our troops or because it protects pedophiles, well then you got played by the right wings desperate attempt to 'frame' this issue in a manner that would drag it down.
I am amazed that so many people want to speak out against this, as if it does ANYTHING to harm anybody int he USA...
Originally posted by Masterjaden
I'm tired of this talk of gay rights. They have the same damn rights that everyone else has.
They choose their lifestyle, they need to live with the consequences of those choices.
Now your getting into motivation, and that is NOT discernible. It IS getting into thought crime punishment territory with this.
You CANNOT discern motivation, even if they tell you, they could be lying and then if a faggot hits on some guy and says f%^K You faggot and the faggot hits him, then he defends himself and beats the crap out of the queer, then he goes to federal prison, that's not right......
Jaden
Originally posted by Masterjaden
I'm tired of this talk of gay rights. They have the same damn rights that everyone else has. They choose their lifestyle, they need to live with the consequences of those choices. If someone chooses to beat them or kill them for it, they will pay the consequences of those actions. The same as if they chose to kill their wife for infidelity, there is no cause to increase the penalty for something for any reason. Now your getting into motivation, and that is NOT discernible. It IS getting into thought crime punishment territory with this.
You CANNOT discern motivation, even if they tell you, they could be lying and then if a faggot hits on some guy and says f%^K You faggot and the faggot hits him, then he defends himself and beats the crap out of the queer, then he goes to federal prison, that's not right......
Jaden
Originally posted by Arkansas
All they have to do is put a amendment to the bill. But the dems don't think its necessary. Go figure when child rapist get more protection from the feds. Sounds like normal gov shoot first then ask questions.
‘‘(3) OFFENSES OCCURRING IN THE SPECIAL MARITIME OR TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES.—Whoever, within the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States, commits an offense described in paragraph (1) or (2) shall be subject to the same penalties as pre scribed in those paragraphs.
Originally posted by Animal
honestly i am getting REALLY tired of the hysteria of the right.
it has more to do with the rights fear of gay rights than anything else. some of the comments in the story linked in the Op are hilarious...
get a grip people.
[edit on 5-5-2009 by Animal]
Originally posted by WTFover
We have had "Hate Crimes" enhancements, for some time now. Can the government show it has reduced crime, at all? No. It has got to be one of the most useless wastes of time and energy.
Vandalism is a crime. Assault is a crime. Murder is a crime. If a criminal is not deterred by these, adding the phrase "Hate Crime" is not going to matter. Particularly to an angry parent of a victim of a pedophile.
Aren't all crimes against persons "Hate Crimes"?
Personally I don't think any group of people should have added protection under the law . If I am beat half to death the max they will get is 15 years . But the gay guy down the street they beat him half to death the perpetrator get the same 15 years plus an additional 10 more .
By adding more years to a sentence for the beating of a protected group under the hate crimes it is saying the act against him is worse than if it happened to a regular person That is giving them a special status over and above a regular citizen . We are suppose to be equal under the law