It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by secretagent woooman
reply to post by centurion1211
The only problem is, as any cop, medic or gun safety expert will tell you, is that the opposite usually happens. You are far more likely to injure yourself or enrage an offender to the point of murdering you by firing a weapon than you are to defend yourself.
It is beyond me why so many Americans look to state a gun is for self defence, arguing the point 'if I had a gun at that moment.' It is true, a gun could prevent a shooting from happening, but that is merely a draconian approach and excuse to keep hold of a deadly weapon.
These are weapons designed to kill people for purposes of war, perfected for that very 'art,' the producers of these weapons are not considering perfecting them for domesticated use. So ultimately, guns should be banned anywhere and everywhere outside a war-zone, or developers should enter into a pursuit of perfection for domesticated use (which would provide the answer for both parties, yes... even those that act as if they must have weapons of murder otherwise they are being ruled by "the" NWO.)
And please, no our 'constitution' this, our 'constitution' that, doesn't change anything but show a nations inability to progress past popular interests for the greater good of man. It shows adherence to popular draconian writings, many of which need great revision, but many a man cannot, or will not, acknowledge that in the United States an almost ancient document is no longer suitable for a progressive mankind.
Originally posted by AlienChaser
If by progression you mean socialism and/or an unelected world goverment with no gaurantee that the people aren't made to serve the government. A place with no gaurantee that the government works in the interest of the people instead of working only to stay in power and removing the peoples means to say anything about it, A place where you are constantly monitored for obedience, are not allowed to speak out(no constitution remember), cannot go to church or own a bible, What a vision....That's not MY dream for America
I think I'm gonna puke.....
Remember this poster is from the UK our constitution is like a giant slap in the face to the British, if they can't learn from their own history they are doomed to repeat it if i'm correct Several of the worlds Tyrant's where their Kings....
Originally posted by AlienChaser
reply to post by Verd_Vhett
Remember this poster is from the UK our constitution is like a giant slap in the face to the British, if they can't learn from their own history they are doomed to repeat it if i'm correct Several of the worlds Tyrant's where their Kings....
Yes, I see that now, thanks. Unfortunatly there are too many Americans who feel this same way.
From Oakland, California, to Binghamton, New York, several mass shootings in recent weeks have killed dozens across the country. But has there been an effect on public opinion?
Yes, and in a surprising way.
Since 2001, most Americans have favored stricter gun laws, though support has slightly dropped in recent years: 54 percent favored stricter laws in 2001, compared with 50 percent in 2007, according to Gallup polling.
Now, a recent poll reveals a sudden drop -- only 39 percent of Americans now favor stricter gun laws, according to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll.
Originally posted by secretagent woooman
reply to post by centurion1211
The only problem is, as any cop, medic or gun safety expert will tell you, is that the opposite usually happens. You are far more likely to injure yourself or enrage an offender to the point of murdering you by firing a weapon than you are to defend yourself. Point blank, people panic in those situations and it is not as easy to play Steven Seagal as it looks on tv, I say this as someone who has been in this situation. I'm all for self defense but please be realistic about it, you would have to see them coming to catch them off guard before they pull a weapon and then it can't even be called self defense in court. As desperate as a lot of people are now they are losing inhibitions about seriously injuring or killing someone else while robbing them so fighting back probably is not the best option in all cases.
Originally posted by MrAnonUK
And please, no our 'constitution' this, our 'constitution' that, doesn't change anything but show a nations inability to progress past popular interests for the greater good of man. It shows adherence to popular draconian writings, many of which need great revision, but many a man cannot, or will not, acknowledge that in the United States an almost ancient document is no longer suitable for a progressive mankind.
Originally posted by centurion1211
People seem to be scared. But it seems to me that perhaps they are more frightened of obama taking away their 2nd amendment rights than they are of criminals at this point. What makes me think this is that a big seller is Wolf ammunition sealed in tins like sardines. You can keep it like that for years ...