The Antarctica deception!

Yes what did you see i am very insterested to know just like everyone else here. You told a story to almost the climax of the story and stopped and had everyone in this thread out of their seats waiting to find out what you saw. This is almost like a very good movie and when it finally reaches to te climax someone shuts off the movie lol.



WHAT DID YOU SEE!?

LOL you should send your script to Hollywood, not some conspiracy site. Would make for a good X-Files episode, but factually, your gonna get caught out here my friend. ATS has some pretty switched on people, and if your telling porky pies, your in for a rude awakening.

Personally, I don't buy it. 4 posts thus far, with nothing but a built up story, yet explaining nothing other than "I seen something"

The story was good though, the suspense and build up was worth the read.

And this has what to do with Ancient & Lost Civilizations?

This should be moved to conspiracy

[edit on 30/3/09 by Hanslune]

Great Story!! Yes, I would like to know what the person or people looked like or was there any kind of markings or flags? Can you upload a map showing where this wall was and the stations location? That would be great insight for all of us. Thanks

for anyone interested in reading some of the diary of Admiral Byrd's trip into Hollow Earth, it can be found here:
www.v-j-enterprises.com...

also...
www.ourhollowearth.com...

he flew to it from the North Pole, though, but an Antarctican expedition might show some similar results if they're digging...

who knows until we try? ...that is, if government doesn't intervene first...


there are plenty of Hollow Earth threads here on ATS, too!

[edit on 30-3-2009 by adrenochrome]

If you mean "Dome C", that's the one owned and operated by France and Italy.

en.wikipedia.org...

I can't see anything on the web about a supposed Dome C and China.

So, is the OP trying to pass of a concrete wall for evidence of some ancient civilization??

why, cant concrete structures be built and abandoned in the south pole??
many have been!

for example, the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, which was built in 1956-1957, and was in use till 1975, is now deeply buried in the snow.

The OP must have seen something like this.

"Gps was something we had heard as a possibillity and a sandpaper probably would have worked better. This was in -97 don´t forget that! "


well i gotta call you out on that one bud, i live in Alaska, and work on the North Slope of Alaska (the very tippy top) i have worn the most expensive high tech cold weather gear you can get (as of 2008) and i can tell you right now, while working hard and producing body heat you can only stay outside in -70 (not even -97) for about 20mins before hypothermia will start to kick in. Heavy equipment, automobiles and machinery has to be run 24hours a day, it can not stop other wise it will not start again.

Snow machines, (especially ones circa 1997) get horrible gas millage, (I'm an abide snow machiner) and for the most part only have an 11 gallon tank and get about 7-8 miles per gallon, so you would have to be pulling 4 or more 55 gallon drums of fuel with you to get that far. (i think it would take a lot more then that actually)

So, the gas issue, and the fact that no human can serve -97 for 12hours let alone 5days leads me to think your story is nothing more then that, a story, interesting as most fiction is, but still fiction.

reply to post by coredrill


Not to be argumentative, but that station is made out of steel, wood, glass and aluminum. You can't use concrete in the Antarctic. You can't mix it, you can't pour it, and it can't harden properly. The only way you're going to have a concrete wall there is if you build a dome over it first. If the wall is a remnant of an ancient civilization, from when the Antarctic was warm, it's possible. But it would be buried beneath the snow.

"Your piss is frozen stiff before it hits the ground! LITERALLY! You DO NOT go out for a piss when its below minus 65 degrees Celcius/minus 85 degrees Farenheit"
The Antarctic Treaty has stringent environmental protection and you are not supposed to do this outside, not that you would anyway

reply to post by moonwilson


perhaps you should check out item 11.1 of the following pdf at the link given below :
www.aad.gov.au...

It says that reinforced concrete walls can and has been used.

The OP saw a concrete wall....didnt he?

here is some more links that concrete is used in antartica..
special Portland Cement for Use in Antartica

and
oai.dtic.mil...






[edit on 30/3/09 by coredrill]

Originally posted by OzWeatherman

Originally posted by serenityone
Well? what do you think?

I think you should quit stalling and tell us your reason for the Chinese presence at Dome C.

And also, I know several people that have been down the ice (at Mawson, Casey and Davis stations), and I myself have the option to spend 6 months or a year down there with my job. Not one of the people Ive known have said anything about military presence down there.

Do you have a source for any of this?

Actually the largest abse down their run by the US is McMurdo Station which is controlled tightly by the military.

Originally posted by coredrill
reply to post by moonwilson

 

perhaps you should check out item 11.1 of the following pdf at the link given below :
www.aad.gov.au...

It says that reinforced concrete walls can and has been used.

The OP saw a concrete wall....didnt he?

here is some more links that concrete is used in antartica..
special Portland Cement for Use in Antartica

and
oai.dtic.mil...






[edit on 30/3/09 by coredrill]

The documents you've linked to say that "it is extremely labor intensive to pour large amounts of concrete, and it is now avoided whenever possible."
"All forms must be insulated" "Precast panels are now used in preference to cast in-situ concrete" and "cast in-situ concrete can be used in Antarctica even in temperatures no lower than -10 degrees Celsius".

The OP seems to describe a cast in-situ concrete wall on a scale that is totally impractical for the climate. Such a wall would require an army of workers and would be prohibitively expensive. Didn't he describe the wall as 20 meters high and at least 40KM long? Give me a break, that's not possible. We're talking about Great Wall scale here. In Antarctica?

EDIT: My mistake, the OP described the wall thusly:

"And suddenly we where in a dead end!
We stopped at a 4,5 meter/15 ft high wall made of concrete! In Antarctica! And that wall wasn´t that old I can ensure you!

We drove along the wall for 40 kilometers and then we stopped and turned back to the Svea station. It seemed like it went on forever..."

So the wall was only 15 feet high, not 20 meters- my mistake. But still- the wall he describes is AT LEAST 40km long. That's big. That's Berlin Wall size at least. Maybe it was precast panels like the Berlin Wall. But whoever went to the trouble of putting it there would know that it would be buried in only a few years.


[edit on 30-3-2009 by moonwilson]

Oohhh! He must have been kidnapped just before dropping his bomb of truth on us. How mysterious.

I'm so tired of this garbage. Only about a third of the threads on this site are even readable anymore.

Can't we start a science-fiction wing for guys like this to blow off steam?

Perhaps it is something to do with this:

I have to adopt a Fox Mulder approach to this. I want to believe. The stories of Neuschawbenland; Byrds failed expedition; explorers being prevented from expeditions; and of course, one of the many suggested locations of Atlantis.

It would appear there are cracks starting to appear in the story which, quite frankly, is par for the course around here. I would give the benefit of the doubt but even I can remember where I was over 5 year periods. I'm not calling BS yet but I'm not hopeful.


[edit on 30-3-2009 by Nirgal]

agartha..



you know well enough why they are 'drilling' into antarctica.



its all changing.

I know who was looking down at them from high above.

I know what they saw.

I know.


It was




John Locke

There is no "Dome 3". You're talking about Dome A. As previously mentioned, the first announcement of China's intent to add another facility here was first made 5 years ago.

Also, Dome A is NOT the highest point in Antarctica. That title goes to Mount Vinson (16,050 ft).

[edit on 3/30/2009 by Unit541]

In Google Earth. Something very large is hidden at:

Latitude: 70°10'30.59"S
Longitude: 87°47'28.58"E


And why have military bases at Antarctica to begin with? This place is not even marked with a description like other graphically altered areas does, as in case of research or military bases..

reply to post by Raabjorn


That's friggin weird. Appears to be 15 miles across and symmetrical.

Good story btw. I wish there was more.