It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Common Good
reply to post by riggs2099
not too light on your feet I take it?
what happened? Pick a fight with the wrong Marine? haha
sorry, you set me up for that one.
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
What illegal orders, actions and laws are you talking about?
Not heard of one gun being taken out of anyone's hands in the past 60 days.
A gun is not going to protect you from an economic collapse and loss of a job, by the way. It isn't going to allow you to vote more. And if people cannot be more informed -- they certainly won't know who is messing up their lives.
What is someone with a gun going to do when they no longer own their own home or have a job? The fascists already stole all your money -- you just don't know it yet. They will be doing nothing but sabotaging any Liberal efforts to stem the hemorrhaging just like a certain fascist group did about 60 years ago to the Weimar Republic.
He said the accumulation of power in the executive branch in recent years has been alarming. The fears crystallized when Obama took office and suddenly had access to the accumulated power.
That, he said, is a "powderkeg."
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
Bush violated at least 4 of their 'points', but Obama is the man to fear? Rhodes' agenda is obvious and dangerous.
Spokesman Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers told WND his organization's goal is to remind military members their oath of allegiance is to the U.S. Constitution, not a particular president.
Originally posted by stinger94
As honorable as his intentions may be, his is wrong, we do have to swear an oath to not only the constitution, but the President of the United States as well. We swear to both, not one or the other. EVERY enlisted member of any military service swears an oath to both. Yes Officers are different, but at least in the Marine Corps, Officers make up just over 10%.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
Bush violated at least 4 of their 'points', but Obama is the man to fear? Rhodes' agenda is obvious and dangerous.
Oath Keepers is non-partisan and Stewart Rhodes is an independent Ron Paul supporter who's appalled at the Bush administration's shredding of the Constitution and diminished civil liberties.
This is his only agenda:
Spokesman Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers told WND his organization's goal is to remind military members their oath of allegiance is to the U.S. Constitution, not a particular president.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen
Now as far as an "Illegal War", since when have you ever been able to judge a Nation's reason for going to War? If a Nation sees it within their scope to take any and all actions necessary in order to secure their future, then by God they have a right to engage in such activities.
Except it wasn't "a Nation" that decided to invade and occupy Iraq.
It was a bunch of treasonous, murderous PNAC neocons like Cheney, Wolfowitz, Abrams, Perle, etc.
As 19th century robber baron Jay Gould said, "I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half."
Originally posted by stinger94
As honorable as his intentions may be, his is wrong, we do have to swear an oath to not only the constitution, but the President of the United States as well. We swear to both, not one or the other. EVERY enlisted member of any military service swears an oath to both. Yes Officers are different, but at least in the Marine Corps, Officers make up just over 10%.