Here is it FEMINISM again, Taking all we men have.

Originally posted by sinister_scarecrow
Look back through all of my posts and know that all of the arguments I had with feminists were founded on reality and that I was right.

Your thread sucks...


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1393862d8ae8.gif[/atsimg]

Originally posted by sinister_scarecrow

As I said this is one case, there are several more, look around the net.

Thats not how it works. You make the claim, you support it. Other wise you are just talking out of your anus.

Originally posted by sinister_scarecrow
As for OJ? Yeah, he got away for awhile, but as I recall, last I heard he is now sitting in prison. Why? because they stuck on him like flies on flypaper until they got him for something. When is the last time you heard of Lafave? Or any other woman who has broken the law? When has a woman who got away from the law ever been hunted so vehemently?Therein lies your answer...OJ IS IN JAIL! Yeah, you pulled that case out of the ether and it still seems you have no case.

As for this, are you literate? Can you read or are you just too lazy to read? The case wasnt about OJ, that was a literary flourish at the beginning of the article. The case was about an entirely different person.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by Illusionsaregrander]

Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander

Originally posted by sinister_scarecrow

As I said this is one case, there are several more, look around the net.

Thats not how it works. You make the claim, you support it. Other wise you are just talking out of your anus.

Originally posted by sinister_scarecrow
As for OJ? Yeah, he got away for awhile, but as I recall, last I heard he is now sitting in prison. Why? because they stuck on him like flies on flypaper until they got him for something. When is the last time you heard of Lafave? Or any other woman who has broken the law? When has a woman who got away from the law ever been hunted so vehemently?Therein lies your answer...OJ IS IN JAIL! Yeah, you pulled that case out of the ether and it still seems you have no case.

As for this, are you literate? Can you read or are you just too lazy to read? The case wasnt about OJ, that was a literary flourish at the beginning of the article. The case was about an entirely different person.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by Illusionsaregrander]

No, I believe it is YOU who are illiterate, I couldn't find reference to OJ in your initial post which tells me that you probably went back and edited out that reference thus trying to make me look foolish or as you say "illiterate" Unfortunately, there are several references that I copied and quoted behind your initial post which clearly still has the initial text in it. NICE TRICK but it won't work as all people have to do is look at a couple of my posts back and see the true text that was there. YOU ARE ILLITERATE>>>NOT ME. Just to validate it though here is YOUR text quoting the OJ case.

"With the Bobbitt case long since over, and the frenzy over the O. J. Simpson case dragging into its fifth month, legal experts on domestic violence, women's advocacy groups and tabloid television shows have fixed their attention on the case of a Maryland man who killed his wife after finding her in bed with another man."

Then YOU said "Is this proof that men can murder their cheating wives and expect a slap on the wrist from a sympathetic judge? I dont think so. It is proof that idiot judges exist. Much like your case shows.
"..... YEAH, before your horrible attempt at a magic trick, it seems you were talking about OJ after all,Now who's illiterate? It's ok others will be able to look back and read what you deleted by looking at my posts just infront of yours. Now you recall the OJ reference,? I thought so.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by sinister_scarecrow]

Scarecrow, please seek some help. I am not trying to sound flip, sarcastic or rude, I am very serious. I suffer from PTSD myself and I can see mental pain and anguish in your posts. Please seek some counseling and help from a family member, clergy or friend. This is from a concerned fellow human, not anyone trying to be above you or anything like that. Rest well, friend. This mess is not that serious man. Wow. Not every woman is out to get you. I certainly am not, for one. I apologize on behalf of your ex who did you wrong, now please try and move on with your life and think constructive thoughts.

Yeah, when I think of Ghengis Kahn , I think of nobility and brave new world too

I wish you could understand how unintelligent you sound.

You women complain about the stupidest things sometimes.

I'm a man, and I'm quite happily married to woman much smarter than you.

I only wish that there were many women in this country who would show the same respect to their fellow man and cover their face up.

Right here is the moment where I realize you are just an insecure loser with sexual performance issues. The ensuing pity wanes any further interest I have in debate with you. Good luck with that viewpoint, watch out for cliffs!



[edit on 12-3-2009 by The Savage Khan]

Originally posted by daeoeste

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by sinister_scarecrow

 

As a man in a "man's world" on a feminine planet, I for one are grateful this planet will be returning into a feminine state of affairs.

As men we have completely and utterly farked this planet like no other - Mars does come to mind for some reason.

We have held women back. We have hurt them by not being real men in letting the feminine nature of Earth (Gaia) rule in all its nurturing ways.

No doubt men like you will continue to cling to false outdated beliefs like you have stated, and I truly feel sorry for you. Surely there are far more important topics that you could 'worry' about?

The masculine has had its chance - the earth demands her femininity back. Now.

wZn

Wow. I think that the first time I heard thoughtless drivel like this was when I heard a guy trying to get laid at the Lilith Fair.
I have news for people that use tired arguments like this in an attempt to convince people that women in power are any different than men. The first is Margaret Thatcher. Blood thirsty. Want more? I gots more. How about the butcher of Waco, Janet Reno. Madeligne Allbright has a special place in hell, a little closer to the glow than Michelle Malkin. Let us also not forget about the bloodthirsty Clinton Dynasty, of whom the pants belong to The Hildabeast.
I am sorry that I do not know how to spell these bags names.

This little group doesn't seem to pose any serious threat or pose anything at all in my view. Let them get together and play like they can effect some kind of change. Just another useless program of no consequence and import in my eyes.

Well I usually just show them my batman poster - that does the trick.

The "women" you used as examples were/are in no way women to me. but then again I shouldn't judge your taste for the feminine. Whatever floats your boat boy wonder.

wZn

There is some terribly dis-respectful behavior here. Almost nothing is being accomplished and people are doing nothing more than pointing fingers and saying "its your fault".

No, fault always lies within, point the finger at yourself and take responsibility for our RACE. Thats right, we're all equal, its nobodies fault but our own at this point. Its time to evolve.

People need to just stop blaming everyone else for the way things are. Looking within you will find all the answers you need. Men and Women BOTH need to treat each other more equally, neither are better.

We must look so ridiculous sometimes acting like this. I honestly cannot imagine what we must look like as a race from an outside perspective.

Be in Peace.

Originally posted by sinister_scarecrow

"..... YEAH, before your horrible attempt at a magic trick, it seems you were talking about OJ after all,Now who's illiterate? It's ok others will be able to look back and read what you deleted by looking at my posts just infront of yours. Now you recall the OJ reference,? I thought so.

Ok, you arent illiterate, just not so bright. Nothing has been removed to make you look foolish. You are doing that all on your own.

See how OJ was only mentioned at the beginning? As a lead in to the story about a man getting away with a slap on the wrists for killing his wife? The man who is from Maryland? Lol. Read the whole thing. There are two quote from that article, plus a link to the whole article. Its not about OJ. His name was mentioned at the top of the article as an attention grabber by the author of the piece.

The piece is about a man from Maryland. Who killed his wife and got 18 months in jail, and the judge said he wished he didnt have to give him any time at all for it.

New York Times article

With the Bobbitt case long since over, and the frenzy over the O. J. Simpson case dragging into its fifth month, legal experts on domestic violence, women's advocacy groups and tabloid television shows have fixed their attention on the case of a Maryland man who killed his wife after finding her in bed with another man.

For the tabloids, the case of Kenneth Peacock, 36 -- who pleaded guilty to killing his wife, Sandra, and was sentenced on Monday to 18 months in jail -- is the lurid story of a long-distance trucker who came home at the wrong time.

Maybe you dont know how links work. You click the bright looking words, and it takes you to the whole article.

Originally posted by SkitzoFrenic

Originally posted by Shrukin89
Man has been dominating this planet for years now. Now the women are standing up and saying, "We are sick and tired of men controling this planet." The energy is trying to balance back to normal. They want just as much rights as everyone else. If women dominate this planet they would at least show care to their neighbors, and not start a war.

women belong in the kitchen! they were created to serve man.

Well im no christian, but if u ask me, feminists are satan worshippers, because they are going directly against the word of god.

eve was created to serve adam, so says the bible.

these feminists worship the dark lord, in all his glory!

Don't forget to send your Mother's Day Card this year SkitzoFrenic

I vote for the title of this thread to be changed to "...FEMINISM, taking all "you" Men have." as opposed to "..all WE men have".

The Op is demonstrating the behavior of a child, not a man. I'm not joking. It'd be entertaining if it weren't so sad.

Originally posted by The Savage Khan

Yeah, when I think of Ghengis Kahn , I think of nobility and brave new world too

I wish you could understand how unintelligent you sound.

You women complain about the stupidest things sometimes.

I'm a man, and I'm quite happily married to woman much smarter than you.

I only wish that there were many women in this country who would show the same respect to their fellow man and cover their face up.

Right here is the moment where I realize you are just an insecure loser with sexual performance issues. The ensuing pity wanes any further interest I have in debate with you. Good luck with that viewpoint, watch out for cliffs!



[edit on 12-3-2009 by The Savage Khan]

First off, you know nothing about my intelligence, but I know something about yours. If you think I am so stupid then why do you argue with me? You see, only a stupid person would take his time to argue with a stupid person. As for your wife being smarter than I? Well, I guess that's what's so great about humanity, I happen to have a different opinion of your wife's intelligence and it's not that flattering, I mean, after all, she DID marry someone who argues with those he considers stupid. She, by derivation of that perfect rational, .....can't be THAT bright. As far as my sexual performance? I have a wife who I please more frequently than even I want to. She is obsessed with me and I can't do anything about it. But coming from YOU, a guy (who's wife wears the pants in the family, apparently) the debasement of my sexual performance means nothing. My wife, however, claims the polar opposite of you and I would tend to take her word for it. As I said, I love women......I just hate feminists. (Men trapped in women's skin). So, you're not going to respond back huh? I care alot. Go get some groceries for you wife then.

[edit on 13-3-2009 by sinister_scarecrow]

[edit on 13-3-2009 by sinister_scarecrow]

Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander

Originally posted by sinister_scarecrow

"..... YEAH, before your horrible attempt at a magic trick, it seems you were talking about OJ after all,Now who's illiterate? It's ok others will be able to look back and read what you deleted by looking at my posts just infront of yours. Now you recall the OJ reference,? I thought so.

Ok, you arent illiterate, just not so bright. Nothing has been removed to make you look foolish. You are doing that all on your own.

See how OJ was only mentioned at the beginning? As a lead in to the story about a man getting away with a slap on the wrists for killing his wife? The man who is from Maryland? Lol. Read the whole thing. There are two quote from that article, plus a link to the whole article. Its not about OJ. His name was mentioned at the top of the article as an attention grabber by the author of the piece.

The piece is about a man from Maryland. Who killed his wife and got 18 months in jail, and the judge said he wished he didnt have to give him any time at all for it.

New York Times article

With the Bobbitt case long since over, and the frenzy over the O. J. Simpson case dragging into its fifth month, legal experts on domestic violence, women's advocacy groups and tabloid television shows have fixed their attention on the case of a Maryland man who killed his wife after finding her in bed with another man.

For the tabloids, the case of Kenneth Peacock, 36 -- who pleaded guilty to killing his wife, Sandra, and was sentenced on Monday to 18 months in jail -- is the lurid story of a long-distance trucker who came home at the wrong time.

Maybe you dont know how links work. You click the bright looking words, and it takes you to the whole article.

Tomatoes, Tomahtos, OJ, Orange Juice. They were both used to convey your point weren't they????? As I see it, whether it was 100% about OJ or just 10%, you still used his case to open up fr the other case thus USING HIM AS AN EXAMPLE. You're the one who's stupid. Now go away, you are really annoying me with this pointless dribble.

The founder of this post seems like a bit of a male chauvinist, but I'll throw in my two cents.

While I support women's rights and equal rights wholeheartedly, I also think the strain of feminism you see on campus has elements of propaganda.

Have women been oppressed in history? Of course. But history sucked for everyone until this century, and even today only in some parts of the world is life good. Men have got some raw deals too. Did women have to fight in Vietnam?

www.youtube.com...

If you haven't seen this video, and you are interested in the truth about feminism... I suggest you give it a look. Fast-forward to nine minutes.

When Aaron Russo says "he", Aaron is referring to David Rockefeller the globalist... you know, the guy who wants to take over the world.

[edit on 14-3-2009 by sliceNodice]

one in four women still experiences domestic violence in their lifetimes



and how many men have been smacked up once by their gf or wife four in four

women go around smacking men all the time

Originally posted by Sublevel10
one in four women still experiences domestic violence in their lifetimes



and how many men have been smacked up once by their gf or wife four in four

women go around smacking men all the time

Good point!

I'd change that to "3 to 4" instead of "4 to 4" to give yourself some leway.
Those numbers really can't be verified because we're men and we can take it. We're not wussies and not going to get laughed at because a girl hit us.

reply to post by Republican08


This attitude just kills me.

If you take a peek at the people in power all over the nation.......they look just like you. Why the hell should white males whine about anything? You guys have been enjoying the lead in things and now the time has come for both male privilege and white privilege to end. None too soon if you ask me.

From the time of the takeover of the male gods anything to do with the Divine Feminine and women has been oppressed. What is wrong are you afraid you can't take what you have been dishing out. Difference is feminine energy is not oppressive at all and you will receive nothing like what you have dished out.

reply to post by sinister_scarecrow



Suck it buttercup. Sometimes life isn't fair, and more often than not it's unfair to women moreso than men.

Feminism = Destruction of Family Unit

You expect you children to grow up normal when neither parent is around to raise them?

This thread is going over the line of the T&C's and it needs to stop. The personal attacks are over as of now.

Any future off topic posts or personal attacks will be dealt with swiftly.

Thank you,

wupy

[edit on 15-3-2009 by mrwupy]