It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
I agree with this man.
Rights only exist so long as the method of enforcing that right does not conflict with the natural rights of any other person.
For example, everyone has a right to free will and do whatever they want. However, if they "want" to kill someone else, then they cannot as it interferes with the other person's right to life.
So how does socialized healthcare come into this? Well to provide a "right to healthcare", the government would have to tax other people. Taxes take away money from others, therefore infringing their natural property rights.
To make money requires effort and time, and time is a measure of how long a person has spent of their life. Therefore if you take away someone's property that they have worked for, you are taking away a part of their life. This is why theft and taxes are tantamount to fractional murder.
The "right" to healthcare cannot be enforced without committing fractional murder on some other person (ie the rich man), therefore it should be unenforceable, and therefore doesn't exist.
Originally posted by Aaron_Justin
reply to post by GrayFox
This is the first I hear about the rest of the world being ashamed of us for our healthcare system. I think we have some of the best medical services in the world. Do you have any sources as to stories of people that cannot bare the thought of us due to the shame that our medical system has caused?
Originally posted by Aaron_Justin
This is another post similar to the one I just responded to. Do not act like if you cannot afford treatment you have to just sit in your recliner and die. There are venues out there for people that cannot afford healthcare.
Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
I agree with this man.
Rights only exist so long as the method of enforcing that right does not conflict with the natural rights of any other person.
For example, everyone has a right to free will and do whatever they want. However, if they "want" to kill someone else, then they cannot as it interferes with the other person's right to life.
So how does socialized healthcare come into this? Well to provide a "right to healthcare", the government would have to tax other people. Taxes take away money from others, therefore infringing their natural property rights.
To make money requires effort and time, and time is a measure of how long a person has spent of their life. Therefore if you take away someone's property that they have worked for, you are taking away a part of their life. This is why theft and taxes are tantamount to fractional murder.
The "right" to healthcare cannot be enforced without committing fractional murder on some other person (ie the rich man), therefore it should be unenforceable, and therefore doesn't exist.
Thank you for saving me the time and effort in formulating a reply to this thread
I could not have stated such a case in more certain terms myself.
Originally posted by Aaron_Justin
reply to post by TheAgentNineteen
It is not just the "rich" people that have to pay for the people without insurance, its the average joes that make a decent living, and already getting hammered on taxes that will have to also foot the bill for someone else.
Imagine how many more people will get on board with universal healthcare for a free ride. People will be going in for a visit to get a hang nail checked out. Why not right, its not like it will cost anything out of that person's pocket! Smile, your poor! Come get your free #!
Originally posted by tjeffersonsghost
The fact is if your really poor or really rich u have health insurance.
Originally posted by Leto
Originally posted by tjeffersonsghost
The fact is if your really poor or really rich u have health insurance.
Incorrect, countless millions of working families don't have health insurance. Please correct your "facts".
www.boston.com...
Originally posted by tjeffersonsghost
Originally posted by Leto
Originally posted by tjeffersonsghost
The fact is if your really poor or really rich u have health insurance.
Incorrect, countless millions of working families don't have health insurance. Please correct your "facts".
www.boston.com...
Ill repeat what I said If your really poor or really rich you have health insurance. The really poor get it from the government and the rich can afford it. You might want to "reread" what Im typing because what I say is "fact" and anyone who is really poor who doesnt have government backed insurance does it because they dont want it. Its the working class who get screwed which is what I said which coincides with your article.
Originally posted by micheshi
Doctors unfortunately do not have the luxury of reducing rates for un/under-insured patients because they run the risk of going to prison if they do.