It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
You ask me where you said that Evolution, and Theory of Evolution are interchangeable. Then you show me a quote of where you said those EXACT words?
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by Masterjaden
Its also the same with creationism.... that is just as unproven. According to you just as ignorant to assume. Look at the millions of people who pray. They have submitted to this possiblity with no futher thought. Atleast evolutionists dont get on their knees everyday.
Originally posted by Masterjaden
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by Masterjaden
Its also the same with creationism.... that is just as unproven. According to you just as ignorant to assume. Look at the millions of people who pray. They have submitted to this possiblity with no futher thought. Atleast evolutionists dont get on their knees everyday.
Did I once EVER say that creationism is a fact? Hell, did I even say that I BELIEVE in creationism.
That. my friend is a HUGE leap from me making a logicly sound statement against the modern misuse of science to me being a bible thumping prosletizer??????
That's like saying that if I don't like democrats that I must LOVE republicans and be for big corporate ownership of everything in America LOL....
Jaden
[edit on 6-3-2009 by Masterjaden]
Originally posted by Wertdagf
Originally posted by Masterjaden
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by Masterjaden
Its also the same with creationism.... that is just as unproven. According to you just as ignorant to assume. Look at the millions of people who pray. They have submitted to this possiblity with no futher thought. Atleast evolutionists dont get on their knees everyday.
Did I once EVER say that creationism is a fact? Hell, did I even say that I BELIEVE in creationism.
That. my friend is a HUGE leap from me making a logicly sound statement against the modern misuse of science to me being a bible thumping prosletizer??????
That's like saying that if I don't like democrats that I must LOVE republicans and be for big corporate ownership of everything in America LOL....
Jaden
[edit on 6-3-2009 by Masterjaden]
Why do you make an assumption i though you were a christian? I was mearly extending your logic so as not to be biased to one side of this discussion.
Originally posted by JPhish
There is a slight difference, because like I said . . . The scheme passively takes form because people naturally want to bolster their belief systems with dazzling diction. People are trying to sell their belief systems to others and reinforce their own faith as well. By using absolutes and claiming to know truths it conveys confidence to some, but to me, it denotes doubt in the person. I have no problem when super-naturalists do such a thing; however when people claim to be scientific, it bothers me, because again . . . like I said before, science is not suppose to have belief systems.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by Masterjaden
Well I don't know about dog's and horses, they'll likely be distantly related. So what about modern day contemporary examples of macro-evolution? You know, the factual kind.
You have already stated that microevolution is real So all I have to do is give examples of speciation because the two added together equal macroevolution.
So take your pick.
www.talkorigins.org...
www.talkorigins.org...
www.talkorigins.org...
All cited and sourced!
My favourite is the bacteria that evolved to digest nylon.
[edit on 6-3-2009 by Welfhard]
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by B.A.C.
A theory in science is a group of scientifically proven facts grouped together Issac Newton theory of gravity proves gravity exists through observations. Now you can be foolish all you want but if you want to test this theory drop something if it flies upwards the theory of gravity has been disproved. There is also clear evidence that evolution has and does occur. We see it in fossil records as well as biology labs. We can see micro organisms adapt though thousands of generations.
Now if this is just your way of trying to prove creationism my suggestion would be to not try to disprove observed facts but instead try to show evolution was planned. Trying to say science is wrong by nit picking 1 word namely theory is foolish and shows you have no understanding of scientific princibles.
"The Theory of Evolution" is NOT a fact.
Evolution is not a theory. It is a fact.
A "Fact" is a verifiable observation
If someone could PROVE to me that God was not fact. I'd have to admit it. I'd be big enough to admit it.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by Masterjaden
You criticism is that species is "agreed upon" yet is still too complicated. Sigh. Well it's certainly a damn sight better that "kind".
Species are generally quite simple. Any two healthy organisms that can produce fertile offspring are the one species. Any two healthy organisms that cannot produce fertile offspring are not the same species (with exceptions such as ring species, in which they are considered non-interbreeding subspecies).
The experiments have been done with fruit flies. Take one population of flies, divide, keep isolated for sufficient generations till groups can no longer cross breed. Speciation 101.
Speciation is fact, it has been observed loads. Microevolution is also fact and is so observable that even YEC's recognise it's factuality.
When you have microevolution and speciation, over great numbers of generations and enough gradual change you have macroevolution.
Microevolution and macroevolution are redundant terms now, used primarily when ToE was still fairly Darwinian, ie. pre- discovery of DNA.
[edit on 6-3-2009 by Welfhard]
These are logical arguments and are logically valid. It doesn't matter what my personal viewpoints are regarding the TRUTH of these staements is, they will never be facts because we cannot VIEW them, they are NOT observable phenomenon and you cannot provide deduced logcial arguments based on evidence that shows that they are.
Originally posted by noobfun
Originally posted by B.A.C.
You ask me where you said that Evolution, and Theory of Evolution are interchangeable. Then you show me a quote of where you said those EXACT words?
im sorry no i showed you a comment that states that evolution, theory of evolution and ToE are all interswitchable and mean the exact same thing as 'the theory of evolution' in the right context in the exact same way
jesus, christ, christ jesus and jesus christ are all interswitchable to be the same person
so i can say evolution when i mean the theory, i can say ToE when i mean the theory, i can say thoery of evolution when i mean the theory
that is a million bazillion light years and several orders of saniuty away from the two things you have o far accused me of which is stating fact an thoery are interchangable an have the same meaning whih they really dont and id love for you to show me that quote
and that i have also stated that 'the theory of evolution' is a fact ...again nonsense i have not uttered
but keep swimming lil fishy the tide cant be this storng all the time right?
so again ....
show me where i aid catagorically that fact and theory are interchangable an have the same meaning in any scientific context
and how me where i have said 'the theory of evolution' is a fact
theory of evolution = ToE = evolution = thoery ... in one context
in a different context
evolution = fact
see my two statements are drastically ifferent to the two your claiming i have said
Originally posted by Daniem
reply to post by B.A.C.
Ladies and gents, time to say goodnight:
"The Theory of Evolution" is NOT a fact.
1)
Correct. The theory of evolution is a scientific theory. The fact of evolution is a scientific fact.
2)
But what if those who say that "the theory of evolution is a fact" ment that it is so, because EVOLUTION is no longer a theory, it has been proven, and is now a fact?
Evolution is not a theory. It is a fact.
3)
The process of evolutionary change has been observed in the laboratory and is a fact of evolution.
4)
The explanation of the fact of evolution provided by the modern synthesis is the latest and most widely accepted theory of evolution.
-So evolution is a fact and a theory
A "Fact" is a verifiable observation
If someone could PROVE to me that God was not fact. I'd have to admit it. I'd be big enough to admit it.
5)
Using your very own definition of fact:
God has not been observed, he is thus not a fact. I have just proved to you that god is not a fact. I dont expect you to be true to your word and be big enought to admit THAT. But maybe the others out there will appreciate to know that.
Thank you, and good night. Have a good one B.A.C.
[edit on 6-3-2009 by Daniem]