It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nerbot
Originally posted by bandaidctrl
I know it wasn't a response to an original christian one,
You sure about that?....
.......I was just keen to counter the religious ads running on public transport, which featured a URL to a website telling non-Christians they would spend "all eternity in torment in hell", burning in "a lake of fire". When I suggested the atheist counter-slogan (now shortened for readability), the response was extremely positive, and hundreds of you pledged your support after the follow-up article.
source: All aboard the Atheist Bus Campaign
I understand your confusion as there are many stories and threads on the subject.
cheers...nerb
Originally posted by converge
Originally posted by bandaidctrl
you're speaking as if all religion has already been proven false.
I'm not claiming that all religions have been proven false, because many or most of the claims religions make are untestable at the moment. However, the ones that we have been able to test (age, shape, location of the Earth etc) have been invariably proven false.
What I meant by extremes, is taking my statement of atheists proving that God probably doesn't exist as a catapult to say that all things which can't be proven must exist.
First, the atheist ad isn't proving anything. You can't say something is probably true or not and claim it's proven. Something being proven and (im)probable are two completely different things.
Secondly, that's not the statement I replied to. I replied to your statement that atheist haven't been able to disprove God's existence (post).
And my answer to that remains the same: for something to be disproved there would have to be data, evidence to be evaluated. In the case of God, there is none. It's not science's job to disprove some claim for which there is no evidence. And science doesn't deal with faith, much less take it as a compelling argument for something's existence.
If atheists are going to make advertisements showing off what they believe to be true, then these other religious groups should be afforded the same right and I don't think anyone should have a hissy fit about it.
As I've stated earlier I have no problems with the Christian people making that ad. At most it makes them look childish because they felt they had to respond to the atheist one, but they have that right too.
But let's not compare the two as if they are equally opposite, they are not. If the Christian ad had been "There is probably a God", that would have been equally opposite, but that's not what the ad said.
Besides, I don't go off and attack atheists over their lack of belief in God
Is the atheist ad an attack on your beliefs?
I respect your view of religion as stuff people make-up but that doesn't change the fact that millions of people around the globe believe in some type of God
Up until 500 years ago practically everyone believed the Earth was the center of the Universe. Is that suppose to give the theory more merit? What people believe and what actually is are two different things.
I'm glad that today people can have views, express opinions and do work that contradicts religions and religious beliefs and not be burned at the stake. I believe Giordano Bruno would have liked that too.
regardless if you think we need medication or not (which is actually a somewhat offensive thing to say), the impact religion has on people is evident throughout the ages.
Is it offensive to call kooks and crazies to people who believe in alien visitation? Perhaps, but that never stopped the media of doing that. I wonder what would happen if the media all of a sudden would call religious people crazy...
Religion and religious people have always been treated in an apologetic way, while other people who believe in things which have not too been proven don't. Maybe that's why you get offended, because you are not used to, and religions indoctrinate people with dogmas.
And what impact exactly are you talking about? And please be free to brush over the Inquisition and the Dark Ages in your response.
The social and human aid work (some) religions do, are entirely possible without religion.
Anywho.... I feel like this is turning into more of a discussion on whether or not God exists, and there are plenty of threads here that pertain to that particular topic.
You can blame yourself for that. You were one of the people that brought up the arguments that the atheists haven't disproved God and started the whole debate.
I'm glad, however, that you finally recognize that that's not what this thread, or the discussion, is about. It's about some ads and what they say.
Originally posted by bandaidctrl
I stand by my opinion that Christian groups and those of other religious organizations have the right to place their advertisements and word them however they like because that is what's true according to their belief, just as the atheist had every right to have their advertisements placed to begin with.
Originally posted by ImaNutter
Until then... QUIT PRETENDING TO KNOW THE ANSWER.
Originally posted by bandaidctrl
yeah I'm sure about that. I've been keeping tabs on the story since I saw the first thread posted here on ATS
Atheist Advertise on Barcelona Buses
Back then, I was just keen to counter the religious ads running on public transport, which featured a URL to a website telling non-Christians they would spend "all eternity in torment in hell", burning in "a lake of fire".
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Saint4God,
This is NOT the place for proseletizing (SP?)
Originally posted by weedwhacker
We understand your pain, when losing a loved one.
BUT, this thread is NOT about faith, it is about adverts on a bus!!!!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
'saint', I have no charges to 'levy' against you!!!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
You are simply posting on the wrong thread.....please re-read the full title, all I'm sayin'....
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Am I the only one to see that BOTH sides have a point? That is, they can buy advert space....irrespective.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
The OTHER discussion, that's best left to another thread!!!!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
IT IS ABOUT Bus adverts!!!!!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
This is NOT a discussion about whether 'god' exists...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Wanna preach?? There are threads on ATS for that. Go look 'em up!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Sorry you misunderstood!!!!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I'm NOT an Atheist....still, I'm a believer in any religion.
To be an Atheist means....well, quite literally...it IS a religion!! To be Atheist!!!!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Let's say, just for grins, that you're a vegetarian. AND you see a bus advert from, oh....say McDonald's or Burger King, whatever....and YOU are offended.
HOW is that any different????
OK....discuss!!!!
The Atheist Bus Campaign began when comedy writer Ariane Sherine wrote a Comment is Free article in June 2008 about the Christian adverts running on London buses. These ads featured the URL of a website which said non-Christians would burn in hell for all eternity. Ariane suggested that atheists reading her article could each donate £5 to fund a reassuring counter-advert. (source)
As with the famous Carlsberg ads (‘probably the best lager in the world’), ‘probably’ helps to ensure that our ads will not breach any advertising codes Committee of Advertising Practice advised the campaign that "the inclusion of the word 'probably' makes it less likely to cause offence, and therefore be in breach of the Advertising Code."