It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by saint4God
- www.drugwatch.org...
Two of these deaths were reported as being induced, or directly caused, by marijuana (that is, an overdose).
I don't know where you get your information mate, but you are dead wrong (excuse the pun).
I posted this a few pages back but you chose to completely ignore it because it does not agree with what you say. But facts are facts and you CANNOT deny this:
Nobody has EVER died from taking only cannabis. EVER. You want proof? Here you go...
LD50 (the dose required to kill half of the research subjects) is the consumption of roughly 1 kilogram (35.2739619 ounces) of cannabis in 1 minute!!
en.wikipedia.org...
There has never been a documented human fatality from marijuana. Information about THC's toxicity is derived from animal studies. The toxicity depends on the route of administration and the laboratory animal. Absorption is limited by serum lipids, which can become saturated with THC, mitigating toxicity. According to the Merck Index, 12th edition, THC has a LD50 (dose killing half of the research subjects) value of 1270 mg/kg (male rats) and 730 mg/kg (female rats) administered orally dissolved in sesame oil. The LD50 value for rats by inhalation of THC is 42 mg/kg of body weight. One estimate of Cannabis's LD50 for humans indicates that about 1500 pounds of marijuana would have to be smoked within 15 minutes. This estimate is supported by studies which indicate that the effective dose of THC is at least 1000 times lower than the estimated lethal dose (a "safety ratio" of 1000:1). This is much higher than alcohol (safety ratio of 10), coc aine (15), or heroin (6).
www.druglibrary.org...
What is the lethal dose of marijuana?
According to which US Government authority you want to believe, the lethal dose of marijuana is either about one-third your body weight, or about 1,500 pounds, consumed all at once.
In summary, enormous doses of Delta 9 THC, All THC and concentrated marihuana extract ingested by mouth were unable to produce death or organ pathology in large mammals but did produce fatalities in smaller rodents due to profound central nervous system depression.
The non-fatal consumption of 3000 mg/kg A THC by the dog and monkey would be comparable to a 154-pound human eating approximately 46 pounds (21 kilograms) of 1%-marihuana or 10 pounds of 5% hashish at one time. In addition, 92 mg/kg THC intravenously produced no fatalities in monkeys. These doses would be comparable to a 154-pound human smoking at one time almost three pounds (1.28 kg) of 1%-marihuana or 250,000 times the usual smoked dose and over a million times the minimal effective dose assuming 50% destruction of the THC by smoking.
Thus, evidence from animal studies and human case reports appears to indicate that the ratio of lethal dose to effective dose is quite large. This ratio is much more favorable than that of many other common psychoactive agents including alcohol and barbiturates (Phillips et al. 1971, Brill et al. 1970).
Now compare that to the likes of 'legal drugs' such as alcohol or tobacco. It blows them out of the water.
Originally posted by MichJJC
Originally posted by nasdack24k
reply to post by saint4God
the thing is, no matter how you look at it, apples are not harmful to the non-apple-allergic vast majority of people
[edit on 2/13/2009 by nasdack24k]
Not true. Too much of anything is bad for you. Even good things like apples and air can harm the healthiest person in excessive quantities.
Originally posted by yadboy
I think ultimately saint4god's problem with cannabis is he/she thinks it's a sin. That's the only explanation that makes sense to me with all the information provided in this thread. If that's their stance I can respect that, they should come right out and say so, but they won't. Because then what little credibility their argument had is lost, from a scientific standpoint. Faith does not stand up well against the scientific method.
Don't get me wrong, I consider myself to be a man of faith as well, just not blind faith.
edit for spelling
[edit on 2/14/2009 by yadboy]
Originally posted by keeb333
Well, s4g, we're waiting (and prepared) for your response...because even if YOU think its a sin, if you believe in the Bible, it does say that God gave all flowering plants to Man to do with as he will (or something like that).
Originally posted by Tentickles
You have to realize this guy trained 12 hours a day for 3 years to go to the Olympics. He's an "American Hero" (I say that loosely) and a role model.
I think he gets a free pass.
He's done more with his life then all the pot heads and drug dealers ever will.
Originally posted by DuneKnight
why do i get the feeling that some people here were raised by wolves. cannabis, marijuana, Bong ---all should remain illegal. heck i would put smoking and alcohol there too if i could. these are mind altering drugs that not only harm you but harm others around you as well, it should be unethical and unacceptable by society.
Originally posted by DuneKnight
why do i get the feeling that some people here were raised by wolves. cannabis, marijuana, Bong ---all should remain illegal. heck i would put smoking and alcohol there too if i could. these are mind altering drugs that not only harm you but harm others around you as well, it should be unethical and unacceptable by society. you guys dont know what you are talking about and the little that you know you use so you can fulfill your selfish needs regardless of the consequences this could bring to social atmosphere.
hypocrisy is right, Phelps was unaffected by this, im not talking about legal stuff, im talking about how society viewed it. now that we have presidents that did this means that its no big deal?? so basically they should teach that in school, marijuana could make you president. if michael phelps remains unaffected by this in society's eyes then there is not stopping kids from doing it and i wont be able to tell them its wrong when all society's idols have been doing it.
people here will say anything so they can get high, so their arguments are not valid because its the high that drives them.
humans cant be trusted with such materials.
[edit on 16-2-2009 by DuneKnight]
Originally posted by ImaNutter
Originally posted by DuneKnight
why do i get the feeling that some people here were raised by wolves. cannabis, marijuana, Bong ---all should remain illegal. heck i would put smoking and alcohol there too if i could. these are mind altering drugs that not only harm you but harm others around you as well, it should be unethical and unacceptable by society. you guys dont know what you are talking about and the little that you know you use so you can fulfill your selfish needs regardless of the consequences this could bring to social atmosphere.
hypocrisy is right, Phelps was unaffected by this, im not talking about legal stuff, im talking about how society viewed it. now that we have presidents that did this means that its no big deal?? so basically they should teach that in school, marijuana could make you president. if michael phelps remains unaffected by this in society's eyes then there is not stopping kids from doing it and i wont be able to tell them its wrong when all society's idols have been doing it.
people here will say anything so they can get high, so their arguments are not valid because its the high that drives them.
humans cant be trusted with such materials.
[edit on 16-2-2009 by DuneKnight]
Where to start...
You are speaking on a subject you know nothing about.
If you scroll up, you can take 5 minutes of your life to read 21 separate studies by people MUCH, MUCH smarter than you... or watch The Union documentary where they interview people MUCH, MUCH smarter than you. You might find your current views challenged by these highly educated people.
I don't understand how you're going to show up in this thread and spout off from the mouth, and have no factual information to back anything you say up.
We've already proven it doesn't hurt you (PLEASE SEE STUDIES I PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED). It can't kill you, no matter how much you TRY and consume, it's physically impossible to reach the LD-50 for cannabis (PLEASE SEE STUDIES I PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED). I would LOVE to hear your reasoning on how it hurts people around you? That is one of the biggest gripes with prohibition, is how can you punish someone for a victimless crime?
Not only a couple presidents smoked cannabis, a LOT of presidents smoked cannabis. The last three we can say for certainty, as well as the first ones...(and probably all those inbetween)
"Some of my finest hours have been spent on the back of my veranda, smoking hemp and observing as far as the eye can see."
-Thomas Jefferson, 1781
I hold George Washington and Thomas Jefferson in much higher regards than I will ever hold an ignorant screen name on the internet.
Societal damage? Selfish needs? Where did this come from? What are you even talking about? Do you have any idea what garbage is coming out of your mouth? Let me ignore your worthless OPINION, and give you some FACTS...
Holland murders per 1000 people: .011
USA murders per 1000 people: .043
Holland prisoners per 1000 people: .11
USA prisoners per 1000 people: .72
Holland burglaries per 1000 people: 1.13
USA burglaries per 1000 people: 1.39
Holland assaults per 1000 people: 2.7
USA assaults per 1000 people: 7.6
source for all above information
So do you want to go ahead and explain to me how toleration towards cannabis equates to a downfall in society? One can reasonably assume with the above statistics that if the USA was MORE TOLERABLE towards cannabis, WE'D BE A BETTER AND SAFER SOCIETY.
It's so hard to reply to your message because it is simply misinformed, uneducated, hateful ignorance at its finest. You spout from the mouth angrily for a couple minutes.... with no factual information.... and we're supposed to take your crap as fact. Give me a break. I gave you factual information refuting your nonsense in this response, and if you go back a page in the thread you will find 21 studies by PhDs, Universities, and even the Government that will tell you THE TRUTH about cannabis. Until you educate yourself a little on this subject, please don't bother coming back...
[B][U]DENY IGNORANCE[/B][/U]
Originally posted by DuneKnight
its makes you an addict and people will do whatever to keep getting high. it can be used to manipulate people into doing horrendous things and is none to shorten you life as it greatly affects your lungs more so than anything.
now whats the purpose of this dug to the user?---is it to keep you awake? is it to enhance your performance? is it to make you healthy? no, it just makes you feel good. NO substance can make you feel that good without undesired consequences, it will impact your body/mind and your long-term behavior.
Originally posted by nasdack24k
I wonder how many apples it would take...
2009 Ganja Olympics
Satire
Originally posted by DuneKnight
its makes you an addict and people will do whatever to keep getting high. it can be used to manipulate people into doing horrendous things and is known to shorten you life as it greatly affects your lungs more so than anything.
now whats the purpose of this dug to the user?---is it to keep you awake? is it to enhance your performance? is it to make you healthy? no, it just makes you feel good. NO substance can make you feel that good without undesired consequences, it will impact your body/mind and your long-term behavior.
[edit on 16-2-2009 by DuneKnight]