It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Iblis Smiley
reply to post by chapter29
So you think there is an active base where people live or that we travel back and forth to the moon often or that this is an alien mine?
Originally posted by internos
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by mikesingh
Mike or Zorgon:
What year did the Russians send their rover(s?) to the moon?
Were they looking for something to mine too?
Lunokhod 1 (Луноход)
Mission: Luna 17
Landed on the Moon: November 1970 (Mare Imbrium)
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
To post a picture, click the following icon on the "Post Reply" screen....
The "east", south... are assumed in relation to the shot only.
The sunlight came from right (east)
Obviously, the "E" crater is a crater. The shadow on the right side, the brightened wall on the left side.
Of course, "C" and "D" are smaller craters themselvs. Shadow in the right, brightened wall in the left.
So, the same goes to "A" and "B". They are small craters, like C and D. Not elevations, but holes.
So the "east" flank of the rectangle is just an ilusion. It does not exist. There are 2 craters, and the brain assume the flank there.
The rectangle is assumed to be a rectangle. pareidolia.
The two objects on the "east" side appear to be rounded on top.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Iblis Smiley
I am providing you with the information to read. Just read it.
The .pdf's are assumed to be legit because they come from places like Los Alamos.
I ask you to check out the Lear thread because there is good info there, and most of it is from other people and not Lear.
People are quoting what i say, because what i say makes sense. Read what has been provided. The answers are in there.
Originally posted by chapter29
Originally posted by Iblis Smiley
reply to post by chapter29
So you think there is an active base where people live or that we travel back and forth to the moon often or that this is an alien mine?
I believe that the 'possibility' of that is favorable...
Helium 3 comes to mind Here
Just like yourself, I truly have no idea; but through many hours of sifting thru $hit
as well as the occasional golden find, it seems to ME that we have been active there for some time...
Am I right..? Who knows, but if I see true evidence to the contrary I will immediately change positions...and that's the beauty of being open minded - switching teams is painless.
And I am in no way taking that for granted - I have a lot of time invested into the topic as many others do as well...but I am prepared to hear the truth.
I haven't taken the time to gather the 411 on just how many nation/states/civilizations have put the 'majority' of their own resources to obtaining wealth outside their own boundries, but I'd bet the number favors my own guestimate...
I believe that the 'possibility' of that is favorable...
Whoa whoa whoa whoa. Back it up here. I thought the reason 3 pages got dedicated to berating me was because I used words like "garbage" to describe the same things that you just called $hit? I thought it was all about the bad bad bad words that I used to descrbie this evidence. Apparently I was right when I said it was just because I did not agree. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I also beleive $hit is a violation of the rules is it not?
as well as the occasional golden find, it seems to ME that we have been active there for some time...
Am I right..? Who knows, but if I see true evidence to the contrary I will immediately change positions...and that's the beauty of being open minded - switching teams is painless.
And I am in no way taking that for granted - I have a lot of time invested into the topic as many others do as well...but I am prepared to hear the truth.
I haven't taken the time to gather the 411 on just how many nation/states/civilizations have put the 'majority' of their own resources to obtaining wealth outside their own boundries, but I'd bet the number favors my own guestimate...
I am a little confused here. I am wondering what value can be put on the "hours" of research put in by people who answer a question the way you just did. This thread is the best ever. So far, each post reminds me why I need to give up hope that any of this is true.
Here is what I asked you
-do you think that
a- there are people living there?
b- that we are traveling back and forth all the time?
or
c- this is an alien base?
Originally posted by chapter29
you...
Well look at who feels like they are getting picked on...awwww - it might have something to do with your social skills...
As for the 'crap' (I will use this word so as not to offend your fragile psyche) I mention - take a look at my other posts (I know, you don't have the time - though you have the time show your a$$ here) and you will see that I also believe many a photo/video/comment that comes through here lacks credibility...but the difference between you and I is that I am willing to go into this with an open mind, rather than a pre-conceived notion.
blah blah blah
You are now questioning my diligence..? You keep sucking more and more - and your sarcasm lacks...sarcasm.
a: yes...that goes back to my earlier resources comment - proof? only what MY own research has come up with...how else would I formulate an opinion.
b: when necessary...proof? - see above.
c: no...not in regards to the "compound", but other anomalies
on the surface may be of et origin, but as stated above, it would be my opinion based on what I have looked into...no where am I telling anyone that's the way it is.
And this is what you are missing - I don't need (though I would love it) ET to appear or Disclosure to happen to confirm MY own beliefs on the subject...
Believe it or not man, I can formulate an opinion, and one that leads to a belief, from looking at grainy ass pictures, reading and listening to I-Witness testimony, going thru a crap load of documents and many shaky-cgi'd-fabricated videos...in hopes of finding something worthy of discussion.
And you base your opinions, your beliefs on what...? Absolutes..?
Then this may not be for you...everything on this site is suspect. But that itself is part of the process - sifting through everything available, and trying to determine what is 'crap' and what is worth another look...
Neither of us have the answers, but your intial perception of this topic (fair to throw that out there since you have expressed your opinion a multitude of times) is one of a skeptic...
If you can bring something of substance rather than just "it's a rock" to the table, than you are of value to this community as both sides engaged in 'debate' usually produce an accurate assesment...otherwise your a waste of everybody's time...
The rest of your post doesn't warrant a comment - o.k., it does...
Originally posted by Iblis Smiley
I think the problem here is that many seem convinced by nothing more than photos. I will admit it is compelling photos that got me to this point. What is still missing is the logic. Even if I accept that these are manufactured structures of some kind...ok now what? There is more to it than that right? Who made them? Who uses them? How often? How do they do it without us ever knowing? How would there be as much traffic as necessary without being exposed by amature astronomers, rocket enthusiasts, and say anyone that would witness that at least one probably disaster that was not supposed to be in the air to begin with.
Originally posted by jaamaan
It would be nice to have a constructive discussion about this topic without any name calling or refering to others posts as "garbage', it does not help to come to cival conclusions at all.
Any more material on the glass domes?
i'd love to see more if there is any.